XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    792 Posts 89 Posters 1.3m Views 69 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J Offline
      john.c @BenjiReis
      last edited by john.c

      @BenjiReis Even if xenbr0 is stays in "UKNOWN" state in normal operation. It still doesn't discount the issue with the DHCP configured DNS servers.

      The DNS configuration is an important part of being able to communicate on networks, as it resolves hostnames to IP addresses.

      Thus if the script, any command and/or program runs any kind of checks on remote systems, such as pinging them for instance by domain name. Then it wouldn't be able to resolve them and would thus think the network is down.

      So the finishing start up may then proceed to hang if it doesn't receive a report that the network connection is in essence up (active), through ping report. No response from ping (100% loss) for instance.

      BenjiReisB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • BenjiReisB Offline
        BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @john.c
        last edited by

        @john-c whats the return of ll /var/lib/misc/ on your host?

        J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J Offline
          john.c @BenjiReis
          last edited by

          @BenjiReis The return for the command you just had me run is attached to this post.

          xensource.log.txt ll-output.txt

          BenjiReisB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • BenjiReisB Offline
            BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @john.c
            last edited by

            @john-c was it a clean install or an update?

            J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J Offline
              john.c @BenjiReis
              last edited by

              @BenjiReis It's a clean install never had an old version on it. Also it is very able to be reproduced.

              BenjiReisB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • BenjiReisB Offline
                BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @john.c
                last edited by

                @john-c Okay thanks, and are confident in your IPv6 DHCP server etc?

                I can't reproduce the issue on my infra and the logs doesn't help much.

                J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • J Offline
                  john.c @BenjiReis
                  last edited by john.c

                  @BenjiReis I'm confident of the DHCP server as it's the same as the one, used by the laptop which the posts are being made on is connected to. Additionally I can use the IPv6 address for another device with a web interface (iLO) and still access it successfully, also the other device is running Cockpit to enable over web browser administration and that system is configured for IPv6 only. Additionally that other device is able to obtain an IPv6 address successfully as well as configure its DNS via DHCP. It's running CentOS 7 but planning transition to possibly Rocky Linux 8 or Ubuntu Linux 20.04 Server.

                  dmesg-output.txt

                  D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D Offline
                    Dennis 0 @john.c
                    last edited by

                    @john-c Are you certain that the IPv6 address+DNS configuration obtained on your laptop + CentOS-machine is actually from DHCP and not from SLAAC?

                    Can you send the the IPv6-address you got on your laptop? (Possibly only the last 64 bits if not comfortable sending the entire IP)

                    J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • J Offline
                      john.c @Dennis 0
                      last edited by john.c

                      @Dennis-0 Yes I can be certain. As the laptop OS (Windows 10) though later to go Linux. It allows you to configure the automatic IP assignment protocol used. In this case it was set to "Automatic (DHCP)", the option can be set to that or manual. The manual option is another way of saying Static IP address.

                      39b5:5b18:bfa2

                      D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • D Offline
                        Dennis 0 @john.c
                        last edited by

                        @john-c
                        I'm not entirely sure I understand your writing correctly, but be aware that "Automatic (DHCP)" can mean both SLAAC and DHCP. DHCP can't stand alone on the network - SLAAC is also needed for route announcement, so you either get defaultroute/address/DNS from SLAAC only or SLAAC+DHCP. Never DHCP alone.

                        Although it is by no means a bulletproof "method", the address part of the last bits of your IP seems a bit too "random" compared to a DHCP-based address - at least from my experience. In the networks I've seen it looks more like DHCP tends to give out more sequential addresses like ::1000:1044.

                        You've posted a screenshot further up which has two IPv6-addresses assigned. Both a ULA and a GUA. They are almost definitely SLAAC-based as they both have the last 64-bits in common and looks like EUI64-based. Do you get addresses from both subnets on your laptop too?

                        What kind of router do you have on your network? Is it some Busiess-grade Cisco, Juniper etc. or i.e OpenWRT which defaults to announcing a ULA-network (not that others can't, but not that typical AFAIK).

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • A Offline
                          alex821982
                          last edited by

                          Please tell me, is it true that machines from 8.3 are not copied to 8.2 ?
                          Copied some machines from 8.2 to 8.3, but does not copy back.

                          stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stormiS Offline
                            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @alex821982
                            last edited by

                            @alex821982 Yes, migration to a lower release is not possible. However you can replicate them using Xen Orchestra's replication feature, which is a way to workaround this constraint.

                            A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • A Offline
                              alex821982 @stormi
                              last edited by

                              @stormi Thanks, it works that way)

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • olivierlambertO Offline
                                olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                last edited by

                                Replication or warm migration will work, indeed 🙂

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • A Offline
                                  alex821982
                                  last edited by

                                  Copied, I get the following error when starting up

                                  FAILED_TO_START_EMULATOR(OpaqueRef:1286de32-6c5a-4e51-b85c-794e66b4d3f7, varstored, Daemon exited unexpectedly)

                                  stormiS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • stormiS Offline
                                    stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @alex821982
                                    last edited by

                                    @alex821982 Interesting. There have been changes in UEFI handling in 8.3, but the daemon failing to start when copied back to 8.2 is unexpected. We'll try to replicate this in our lab. If we can't, we'll ask you for more logs.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • stormiS Offline
                                      stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @alex821982
                                      last edited by

                                      @alex821982 Is Secure Boot enabled for this VM in Xen Orchestra? If so, can you try disabling it?

                                      A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • A Offline
                                        alex821982 @stormi
                                        last edited by

                                        @stormi
                                        No is not enabled. I don 't use this option on any machines at all )

                                        stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • stormiS Offline
                                          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @alex821982
                                          last edited by

                                          @alex821982 What's the operating system on the VM?

                                          A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • A Offline
                                            alex821982 @stormi
                                            last edited by

                                            @stormi
                                            This is a XOA machine on Ubuntu 22.04

                                            BenjiReisB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post