XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Import from VMware fails after upgrade to XOA 5.91

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    64 Posts 8 Posters 14.2k Views 9 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A Offline
      archw @acomav
      last edited by archw

      @acomav said in Import from VMware fails after upgrade to XOA 5.91:

      redid the job with a snapshot from a running VM to a local SR. Same issue occurred at the same time.

      I too did the same thing; it didn't work for me either.

      He is what did work:

      1. Ran quick deploy
        https://xen-orchestra.com/#!/xoa
      2. It installs an older version (don't remember the version).
      3. I had it do one upgrade which takes it to XOA 5.90.
      4. Once it did that, it let me do the import from esxi.
      florentF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • olivierlambertO Offline
        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
        last edited by

        5.90 is the current stable release channel, without the speed improvement (and the bug). We'll have a patch release for 5.91 (current latest) that will solve it 🙂

        A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • A Offline
          archw @olivierlambert
          last edited by

          @olivierlambert
          Thanks!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • florentF Offline
            florent Vates 🪐 XO Team @archw
            last edited by florent

            @khicks : that is a great new

            @archw @jasonmap @rmaclachlan I pushed a new commit to the branch fix_xva_import_thin , alignining the last block to exactly 1MB . Could you test if the imports are working now ?

            For those who have an XOA and want to help, please open a tunnel and send me the tunnel yb chat ( not directly in this topic) , and I will patch your appliance

            FOr those who use XO from the source , you'll need to change branch

            J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J Offline
              jasonmap @florent
              last edited by

              @florent

              Over the weekend I spun up an XO instance from source. This morning I changed to 'fix_xva_import_thin' after your post. Unfortunately, still the same failure for me. Only notable difference I see is that your ${str} addition for the log now comes back as " undefined"

              Here are my logs:

              From XO:

              vm.importMultipleFromEsxi
              {
                "concurrency": 2,
                "host": "vsphere.nest.local",
                "network": "7f7d2fcc-c78b-b1c9-101a-0ca9570e3462",
                "password": "* obfuscated *",
                "sr": "50d8f945-8ae4-dd87-0149-e6054a10d51f",
                "sslVerify": false,
                "stopOnError": true,
                "stopSource": true,
                "user": "administrator@vsphere.local",
                "vms": [
                  "vm-2427"
                ]
              }
              {
                "succeeded": {},
                "message": "no opaque ref found in  undefined",
                "name": "Error",
                "stack": "Error: no opaque ref found in  undefined
                  at importVm (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202402050455/@xen-orchestra/xva/importVm.mjs:28:19)
                  at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)
                  at importVdi (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202402050455/@xen-orchestra/xva/importVdi.mjs:6:17)
                  at file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202402050455/packages/xo-server/src/xo-mixins/migrate-vm.mjs:260:21
                  at Task.runInside (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202402050455/@vates/task/index.js:158:22)
                  at Task.run (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202402050455/@vates/task/index.js:141:20)"
              }
              

              and from journalctl:

              Feb 05 05:12:04 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]: 2024-02-05T10:12:04.864Z xo:xo-server WARN possibly unhandled rejection {
              Feb 05 05:12:04 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:   error: Error: already finalized or destroyed
              Feb 05 05:12:04 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:       at Pack.entry (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202402050455/node_modules/tar-stream/pack.js:138:51)
              Feb 05 05:12:04 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:       at Pack.resolver (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202402050455/node_modules/promise-toolbox/fromCallback.js:5:6)
              Feb 05 05:12:04 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:       at Promise._execute (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202402050455/node_modules/bluebird/js/release/debuggability.js:384:9)
              Feb 05 05:12:04 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:       at Promise._resolveFromExecutor (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202402050455/node_modules/bluebird/js/release/promise.js:518:18)
              Feb 05 05:12:04 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:       at new Promise (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202402050455/node_modules/bluebird/js/release/promise.js:103:10)
              Feb 05 05:12:04 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:       at Pack.fromCallback (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202402050455/node_modules/promise-toolbox/fromCallback.js:9:10)
              Feb 05 05:12:04 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:       at writeBlock (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202402050455/@xen-orchestra/xva/_writeDisk.mjs:15:22)
              Feb 05 05:12:04 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]: }
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]: root@10.96.22.111 Xapi#putResource /import/ XapiError: IMPORT_ERROR(INTERNAL_ERROR: [ Unix.Unix_error(Unix.ENOSPC, "write", "") ])
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:     at Function.wrap (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202402050455/packages/xen-api/_XapiError.mjs:16:12)
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:     at default (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202402050455/packages/xen-api/_getTaskResult.mjs:11:29)
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:     at Xapi._addRecordToCache (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202402050455/packages/xen-api/index.mjs:1006:24)
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:     at file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202402050455/packages/xen-api/index.mjs:1040:14
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:     at Array.forEach (<anonymous>)
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:     at Xapi._processEvents (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202402050455/packages/xen-api/index.mjs:1030:12)
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:     at Xapi._watchEvents (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202402050455/packages/xen-api/index.mjs:1203:14) {
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:   code: 'IMPORT_ERROR',
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:   params: [ 'INTERNAL_ERROR: [ Unix.Unix_error(Unix.ENOSPC, "write", "") ]' ],
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:   call: undefined,
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:   url: undefined,
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:   task: task {
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:     uuid: '0f812914-46c0-fe29-d563-1af7bca72d96',
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:     name_label: '[XO] VM import',
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:     name_description: '',
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:     allowed_operations: [],
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:     current_operations: {},
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:     created: '20240205T10:07:04Z',
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:     finished: '20240205T10:12:06Z',
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:     status: 'failure',
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:     resident_on: 'OpaqueRef:85a049dc-296e-4ef0-bdbc-82e2845ecd68',
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:     progress: 1,
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:     type: '<none/>',
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:     result: '',
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:     error_info: [
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:       'IMPORT_ERROR',
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:       'INTERNAL_ERROR: [ Unix.Unix_error(Unix.ENOSPC, "write", "") ]'
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:     ],
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:     other_config: { object_creation: 'complete' },
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:     subtask_of: 'OpaqueRef:NULL',
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:     subtasks: [],
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:     backtrace: '(((process xapi)(filename lib/backtrace.ml)(line 210))((process xapi)(filename ocaml/xapi/import.ml)(line 2021))((process xapi)(filename ocaml/xapi/server_>
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]:   }
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]: }
              Feb 05 05:12:06 xoa-fs xo-server[32410]: 2024-02-05T10:12:06.930Z xo:api WARN admin@admin.net | vm.importMultipleFromEsxi(...) [5m] =!> Error: no opaque ref found in  undefined
              
              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A Offline
                acomav
                last edited by

                I patched my XO source VM with the latest from 5th Feb and still had the same error.
                "stack": "Error: no opaque ref found in undefined

                It may be I am not patching correctly so I have added a XOA trial and moved to the 'latest' channel and have ping @florent with a support tunnel to test in the morning.

                florentF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • florentF Offline
                  florent Vates 🪐 XO Team @acomav
                  last edited by

                  @acomav you're up to date on your XOA

                  I pushed a new commit , fixing an async condition on the fix_xva_import_thin branch . Feel free to test on your XO from source.

                  J A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                  • R Offline
                    rmaclachlan
                    last edited by

                    Thank you @florent for all your help! We got the VM to import now, I will try the other failed VM outside business hours but I expect it will work now as well!

                    florentF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • florentF Offline
                      florent Vates 🪐 XO Team @rmaclachlan
                      last edited by

                      @rmaclachlan said in Import from VMware fails after upgrade to XOA 5.91:

                      Thank you @florent for all your help! We got the VM to import now, I will try the other failed VM outside business hours but I expect it will work now as well!

                      thank you for the help

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J Offline
                        jasonmap @florent
                        last edited by

                        @florent Nice! This latest change allowed my migration to complete successfully. Seems like the peak transfer speed was about 70Mbps. 4.77GB in 5 minutes. I'm guessing the thin/zeros made this so fast?

                        florentF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • florentF Offline
                          florent Vates 🪐 XO Team @jasonmap
                          last edited by florent

                          @jasonmap said in Import from VMware fails after upgrade to XOA 5.91:

                          @florent Nice! This latest change allowed my migration to complete successfully. Seems like the peak transfer speed was about 70Mbps. 4.77GB in 5 minutes. I'm guessing the thin/zeros made this so fast?

                          yay
                          the thin make it fast(espcially since it only need one pass instead of two in the previous api), XCP is a little faster to load xva , and there is some magic . No secret though, everything is done in public

                          we invested a lot of time and energy to make it work fast, and we have more in pipeline, to make it work in more case ( vsan I am looking at you) or to access more easy the content of running VM

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • R Offline
                            rmaclachlan
                            last edited by

                            Just a quick update - I imported a handful of VMs today and was even able to move over the VM that failed on the weekend so I think that patch works @florent

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • A Offline
                              acomav @florent
                              last edited by

                              @florent
                              Thanks. I have kicked off an Import but it takes 2 hours however....the first small virtual disk has now been successful whereas it was failing, so I am confident the rest will work. Will update then.

                              Thanks

                              A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • A Offline
                                acomav @acomav
                                last edited by

                                @acomav

                                Import completed. Great work @florent.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • A Offline
                                  acomav
                                  last edited by

                                  Hi, a question about these patches and thin provisioning.

                                  My test import now works, however, it fully provisioned the full size of the disk on an NFS SR.

                                  [root@XXXX ~]# ls -salh /mnt/NFS/d8ad046d-c279-5bd6-8ed7-43888187f188/
                                  total 540G
                                  4.0K drwxr-xr-x  2 root root 4.0K Feb  6 09:33 .
                                  4.0K drwxr-xr-x 27 root root 4.0K Feb  1 21:22 ..
                                  151G -rw-r--r--  1 root root 151G Feb  6 10:45 1c3b93da-de07-4a4f-8229-60635bc2f279.vhd
                                   13G -rw-r--r--  1 root root  13G Feb  6 09:43 1eae9130-e6eb-45be-ae25-a7dcb7ee8f4e.vhd
                                  171G -rw-r--r--  1 root root 171G Feb  6 10:51 751b7a5f-df32-4cb1-9479-e196671e7149.vhd
                                  

                                  The two large disks are in an LVM VG on the source and combined, use up 253 GB of the 320 GB LV. They are thin provisioned on the VMware side.

                                  Am I wrong to expect the vhd files on the NFS SR to be smaller than what I see? Does LVM on the source negate thin provisioning on the xcp-ng side?

                                  Not a big deal, I am just curious.

                                  Thanks

                                  florentF olivierlambertO 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • florentF Offline
                                    florent Vates 🪐 XO Team @acomav
                                    last edited by

                                    thank you all, now time to do a patch release

                                    @acomav said in Import from VMware fails after upgrade to XOA 5.91:

                                    Hi, a question about these patches and thin provisioning.

                                    My test import now works, however, it fully provisioned the full size of the disk on an NFS SR.

                                    [root@XXXX ~]# ls -salh /mnt/NFS/d8ad046d-c279-5bd6-8ed7-43888187f188/
                                    total 540G
                                    4.0K drwxr-xr-x  2 root root 4.0K Feb  6 09:33 .
                                    4.0K drwxr-xr-x 27 root root 4.0K Feb  1 21:22 ..
                                    151G -rw-r--r--  1 root root 151G Feb  6 10:45 1c3b93da-de07-4a4f-8229-60635bc2f279.vhd
                                     13G -rw-r--r--  1 root root  13G Feb  6 09:43 1eae9130-e6eb-45be-ae25-a7dcb7ee8f4e.vhd
                                    171G -rw-r--r--  1 root root 171G Feb  6 10:51 751b7a5f-df32-4cb1-9479-e196671e7149.vhd
                                    

                                    The two large disks are in an LVM VG on the source and combined, use up 253 GB of the 320 GB LV. They are thin provisioned on the VMware side.

                                    Am I wrong to expect the vhd files on the NFS SR to be smaller than what I see? Does LVM on the source negate thin provisioning on the xcp-ng side?

                                    Not a big deal, I am just curious.

                                    Thanks

                                    LVM is thick provisionned on XCP side : https://xcp-ng.org/docs/storage.html#storage-types

                                    A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • olivierlambertO Offline
                                      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO @acomav
                                      last edited by

                                      @acomav How big are you original VM disks? (eg the total disk size on VMware)

                                      A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • A Offline
                                        acomav @florent
                                        last edited by

                                        @florent The VM is on an NFS SR which is thin provisioned. LVM is inside the VM on the virtual disks.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • A Offline
                                          acomav @olivierlambert
                                          last edited by

                                          @olivierlambert Hi.
                                          The disk sizes (and vmdk file size) are 150GB and 170GB. Both are in a Volume group and one Logical Volume using 100% of the Volume group mounted using XFS.

                                          Disk space in use is 81%:

                                          # pvs
                                            PV         VG         Fmt  Attr PSize    PFree
                                            /dev/sda2  centos     lvm2 a--   <15.51g    0 
                                            /dev/sdb   VolGroup01 lvm2 a--  <150.00g    0 
                                            /dev/sdc   VolGroup01 lvm2 a--  <170.00g    0 
                                          
                                          # vgs
                                            VG         #PV #LV #SN Attr   VSize   VFree
                                            VolGroup01   2   1   0 wz--n- 319.99g    0 
                                            centos       1   2   0 wz--n- <15.51g    0
                                          
                                          # lvs
                                            LV        VG         Attr       LSize   Pool Origin Data%  Meta%  Move Log Cpy%Sync Convert
                                            IMAPSpool VolGroup01 -wi-ao---- 319.99g 
                                          
                                          # df -h
                                          /dev/mapper/VolGroup01-IMAPSpool  320G  257G   64G  81% /var/spool/imap
                                          

                                          The vmdk files live on an HPE/Nimble CS3000 (Block iscsi). I am now thinking I will need to get into the VM and free up discarded/deleted blocks....which would make the vmdk sizes smaller. (as they are set to thin provisioned with vmfs)
                                          I'll do that and retry and report back if I see the the full disk being written out to XCP-NG.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • olivierlambertO Offline
                                            olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                            last edited by

                                            Good idea, thanks 🙂

                                            A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post