Unable to mount NFS Remote for backups while storage and ISO NFS SR's work perfectly
-
.22 XCP-ng host
.24 XOA
.115 Unraid server1 - Able to mount with no issues
.114 Unraid server2 - Able to mount with no issues -
What gets me is that if it was permissions related, theoretically, it should not mount the nfs storage SR with the same settings pointing to the xcpng host from the same qnap?!
It feels like something is different between the xoa nfs implementation and the xcpng host itself.
Dont you agree? -
@Bub I agree, all checks are green
could you do a : ip a
on the xoa ? -
xo@xo-ce:/run/xo-server/mounts/LAB-NFS$ ip a
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether c6:e3:43:a1:5b:e7 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.221.24/24 brd 192.168.221.255 scope global eth0
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::c4e3:43ff:fea1:5be7/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever -
get out of /run/xo-server/mounts/LAB-NFS
could you do a : mount -t nfs
just to see if there is not ALREADY a mount point... ?
if there is just do : umount /run/xo-server/mounts/LAB-NFS
-
This post is deleted! -
xo@xo-ce:~$ mount -t nfs
xo@xo-ce:~$ sudo mount -v -t nfs -o vers=3 192.168.221.20:/LAB-NFS /run/xo-server/mounts/LAB-NFS/
mount.nfs: timeout set for Thu Nov 20 16:50:18 2025
mount.nfs: trying text-based options 'vers=3,addr=192.168.221.20'
mount.nfs: prog 100003, trying vers=3, prot=6
mount.nfs: trying 192.168.221.20 prog 100003 vers 3 prot TCP port 2049
mount.nfs: prog 100005, trying vers=3, prot=17
mount.nfs: trying 192.168.221.20 prog 100005 vers 3 prot UDP port 54698
xo@xo-ce:~$ mount -t nfs
192.168.221.20:/LAB-NFS on /run/xo-server/mounts/LAB-NFS type nfs (rw,relatime,vers=3,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=192.168.221.20,mountvers=3,mountport=54698,mountproto=udp,local_lock=none,addr=192.168.221.20)
xo@xo-ce:~$ sudo umount /run/xo-server/mounts/LAB-NFS
xo@xo-ce:~$ mount -t nfsSo mounting in CLI seems to show it created a mount but i do not see it in the gui. so I unmounted it again and tried to remount in the gui remotes, its did add the remote but after a while, it gave a timeout error
{
"shortMessage": "Command failed with exit code 32: mount -o hard -t nfs 192.168.45.20:/LAB-NFS /run/xo-server/mounts/eecbb7da-e271-4c39-9681-5b50f8d65e9a",
"command": "mount -o hard -t nfs 192.168.45.20:/LAB-NFS /run/xo-server/mounts/eecbb7da-e271-4c39-9681-5b50f8d65e9a",
"escapedCommand": "mount -o hard -t nfs "192.168.45.20:/LAB-NFS" "/run/xo-server/mounts/eecbb7da-e271-4c39-9681-5b50f8d65e9a"",
"exitCode": 32,
"stdout": "",
"stderr": "mount.nfs: Connection timed out",
"failed": true,
"timedOut": false,
"isCanceled": false,
"killed": false
} -
@Bub why 192.168.45.20 in the REMOTE configuration ?!
in CLI you point to 192.168.221.20
-
OMG I guess that's what happens when you try to to work on two labs same time, I mixed the lab1 subnet I'm working on with the lab2 on my last mount attempt.
I changed it to the correct subnet and it mounted properly this time
Can it be that unmounting it in cli fixed the issue?
I am going to try the same unmount command on lab1 setup, and see if that will get it going also.Thank you so much @Pilow . I appreciate the time and energy you spend helping me with this one!
-
@Bub haha great
yup in the process, you probably had a successful test in CLI to mount and it would block in XOA remote config as the mount already exists.
in your first post it was : "stderr": "mount.nfs: failed to prepare mount: Operation not permitted
and you had a mount.nfs: mount(2): Device or resource busy later onso keep this unmount command in case
-
I will tell you a little secret, you taught me more than that one command for CLI lol
One more important note for my Bitwarden
Thanks again bud!