XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Manual snapshots retention

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Management
    46 Posts 6 Posters 2.0k Views 5 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • olivierlambertO Online
      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
      last edited by olivierlambert

      I don't understand the question 🤔 XO 6 is already here and takes 90% of our XO front team load. Anything on XO 5 will slow down the number of features available in XO 6.

      Tristis OrisT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Tristis OrisT Offline
        Tristis Oris Top contributor @olivierlambert
        last edited by

        @olivierlambert we are waiting for release)

        at least it needs to be fixed in xo6.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • olivierlambertO Online
          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
          last edited by olivierlambert

          Waiting for what? Just add /v6 to access XO 6. The "release" is just having XO 6 by default, but it's not like "now it's available". It is already the case.

          For XO 6, since it will be very different, you won't have exactly the same way of doing things than XO 5, but yes, it should be better in any way 🙂

          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M Offline
            manilx @olivierlambert
            last edited by

            @olivierlambert This feature was added not long ago anyway. Pity the text was put in this way.... The "concern" that it might scare others (did us) is valid as 99% use XO5 today.
            So, perhaps you might save on support calls? My 2 cents anyway

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • olivierlambertO Online
              olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
              last edited by olivierlambert

              I will let XO PO to decide about this. Pinging @lsouai-vates

              lsouai-vatesL 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • lsouai-vatesL Offline
                lsouai-vates Vates 🪐 XO Team @olivierlambert
                last edited by

                @olivierlambert we are thinking about implementing a relationnal DB in the future. Maybe it could offer to stock snapshots as "archived"... I don't know for now.

                I understand that it could be risky to delete old snapshots, and maybe the responsability of setting the snaspshots retention can be an ACL subject...

                There are plenty of avenues of work on this topic, and more generally on the retention of information about objects, tasks, and other actions. It's a real in-depth topic.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post