XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XOA v6 create (dynamic) groups to organize vms - Feature request

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    4 Posts 4 Posters 36 Views 5 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B Offline
      bjdemon
      last edited by bjdemon

      Hey all

      I couldn't find a dedicated feature request page for XOA v6, so I will post it here.
      I have been using XCP-NG and XOA for a few years now and since I really like the product I decided to play around with XOA v6 (preview).

      One think that I noticed is that all the VM are listed under its host, which is obviously fine.
      In a larger environment it can get cluttered if you have lots of VMs.

      One way to solve this, is by letting users create (sub)folder/groups (in a custom view tab?).
      E.g. I can create a static group for all my Windows VMs with different sub groups for domain controllers, lab environment, DNS server...

      To take this even further, an option can be added for dynamic groups to dynamically populate the groups based on certain criteria. Since XCP-NG knows what OS is running inside a VM, it can automatically place VMs inside of groups based on the rules the user has put in place for said (sub)group(s).

      E.g. I create a new VM called dc01 and it runs Windows as OS. By creating the following rule:
      "name" -contains "dc" AND "os name" -contains "Windows"

      It automatically "places" the VM in the following sub group
      Windows ==> domain controllers

      Where exactly the custom view tab would be placed best, I would leave that to the UX designers, but I have included a screenshot for a possible place, right below the search:
      image.psd.png

      The static folder/group approach would be easy to implement I think, about the dynamic approach I'm not sure, but it would be neat for sure!

      Edit: in the future the groups can also be used to manage access. E.g. a certain user or groups of users can only access Windows VM group, Linux VM group, Lab VM group....

      Thank for reading the post!

      lsouai-vatesL 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • olivierlambertO Offline
        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
        last edited by

        Adding @lsouai-vates in the convo

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • lsouai-vatesL Offline
          lsouai-vates Vates 🪐 XO Team @bjdemon
          last edited by

          @bjdemon Hello, and thanks for you report! We are aware of this issue, and we already added it to our roadmap 🙂

          We will keep you inform when it is ready!

          Have a good day!

          Vincent GV 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • Vincent GV Offline
            Vincent G Vates 🪐 Pro Services @lsouai-vates
            last edited by

            @lsouai-vates 👌 💪

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • First post
              Last post