"NOT_SUPPORTED_DURING_UPGRADE()" error after yesterday's update
-
Yesterday I upgraded to the most recent version of XCP-NG 8.3 via yum update.
Last night's backup is full of this error using the following:
Xen Orchestra, commit 8448b
Xen Orchestra, commit 1de60I looked at the logs and they pointed to a snapshot error.
For the heck of it , I tried running a snapshot on any of the VM's. Each one fails with this error:
vm.snapshot { "id": "0b65cf83-8309-3dcc-fa94-a511c77c96bd" } { "code": "NOT_SUPPORTED_DURING_UPGRADE", "params": [], "task": { "uuid": "71b630bb-d299-bab2-c2e9-065cd4bfef5c", "name_label": "Async.VM.snapshot", "name_description": "", "allowed_operations": [], "current_operations": {}, "created": "20251219T14:33:39Z", "finished": "20251219T14:33:39Z", "status": "failure", "resident_on": "OpaqueRef:3ea53cca-30d6-7c19-3f77-3f7eb26c6675", "progress": 1, "type": "<none/>", "result": "", "error_info": [ "NOT_SUPPORTED_DURING_UPGRADE" ], "other_config": {}, "subtask_of": "OpaqueRef:NULL", "subtasks": [], "backtrace": "(((process xapi)(filename ocaml/xapi/xapi_vm_lifecycle.ml)(line 755))((process xapi)(filename ocaml/xapi/xapi_vm_helpers.ml)(line 1653))((process xapi)(filename fun.ml)(line 33))((process xapi)(filename fun.ml)(line 38))((process xapi)(filename ocaml/xapi/helpers.ml)(line 1788))((process xapi)(filename ocaml/xapi/xapi_vm_helpers.ml)(line 1652))((process xapi)(filename ocaml/xapi/message_forwarding.ml)(line 1740))((process xapi)(filename ocaml/xapi/rbac.ml)(line 229))((process xapi)(filename ocaml/xapi/rbac.ml)(line 239))((process xapi)(filename ocaml/xapi/server_helpers.ml)(line 78)))" }, "message": "NOT_SUPPORTED_DURING_UPGRADE()", "name": "XapiError", "stack": "XapiError: NOT_SUPPORTED_DURING_UPGRADE() at Function.wrap (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202512190914/packages/xen-api/_XapiError.mjs:16:12) at default (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202512190914/packages/xen-api/_getTaskResult.mjs:13:29) at Xapi._addRecordToCache (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202512190914/packages/xen-api/index.mjs:1078:24) at file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202512190914/packages/xen-api/index.mjs:1112:14 at Array.forEach (<anonymous>) at Xapi._processEvents (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202512190914/packages/xen-api/index.mjs:1102:12) at Xapi._watchEvents (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202512190914/packages/xen-api/index.mjs:1275:14)"I've tried restarting the toolstack on the pool master as well as the hosts.
Any ideas?
-
Were the hosts rebooting after the patches were applied?
-
@Danp
Nope! -
@archw I'd advise to read documentation at the part related to rebooting after package upgrades: https://docs.xcp-ng.org/management/updates/#-when-to-reboot
In this case "xen" updates were included in December package updates which results in one of the criteria for having to reboot being met.
Personally I reboot every time package updates were installed. You stay on the safe side by doing so.
-
@MajorP93
I always reboot at the conclusion of the update and did as well this time. -
@archw I'm confused by your recent responses. I asked --
Were the hosts rebooting after the patches were applied?
to which you replied --
Nope!
but then you stated
I always reboot at the conclusion of the update and did as well this time.
Which is correct?
-
@archw Mhh, Danp asked if you rebooted your hosts after applying the patches and you said nope.
-
@MajorP93
My bad....because of the word "rebooting" I took the statement "Were the hosts rebooting after the patches were applied?' to mean 'Were the hosts rebooting while the patches were being applied?'To recap:
I did reboot after the patches had been applied.Sorry !!
-
@archw Ohh I get it now! The "rebooting" instead of "rebooted" can be understood as "did applying the patches cause the systems to reboot" as in system crash or similar.
Gotcha!
Understood what you meant now.//EDIT: anyways, back to topic. In case the systems were already rebooted after applying the updates I currently do not have an idea what might cause this...
-
s/rebooting/rebooted
Apologies for the miswording on my end.

-
@Danp
WDE