XOA Create VM and Delete VM Struggling..... Tasks Getting Stuck.....?
-
XO from sources means you are probably in XO6, have you tried from the XO5 link or tried from XO-lite?
Is the storage where you are trying to put it properly connected and working?
I haven't had to create a VM since version 6 came out, but I thought there was a thread mentioning some difficulty making a new VM from xo6.
-
@Greg_E Looks like I'm still on XOA 5 as I can see the "Try XOA 6" in the side menu.
Just tried to create a VM via XCP-ng Centre, getting the same issues.
Can't create or Delete VMs.
I've SSH'd into the HostOS, and I can successfully ping the Storage Repository.
Then just tried removing the existing Storage Repository where the ISOs are hosted, and it wouldn't disconnect, just hanging again.
Tried to create a new Storage Repository (same as the old ones for the ISOs) and that wouldn't connect.
Certainly feels like something SR related.
Just noticed too that one of the backup jobs that sends the backups to a different SR on the same machine where the ISOs live also failed.
Something has happened yesterday which is making the HostOS now no longer able to connect to the SR.
I've just tried disabling Norton Firewall on the machine where the SR live, as that has got in the way historically, but that made no difference.
Also just checked the Windows CIFS / SMB Settings and noticed that one of the three options was unchecked (previously all three where checked and I know that has not been disabled manually) - So will give a reboot a go to see if that solve things.
Bit baffled what else to try to get the SR re-connected as literally nothing manually has changed, so it has to be some Windows or Norton janky auto update that has kicked in and screwed things up.
Hmmm.....
-
Keep us posted!
-
Hmm.....
yum install -y nc nc -zv {IP of Windows Machine where SRs live} 445 Ncat: Version 7.50 ( https://nmap.org/ncat ) Ncat: Connected to {IP of Windows Machine where SRs live}:445. Ncat: 0 bytes sent, 0 bytes received in 0.01 seconds.Is that suggesting with 0 bytes sent that it's not getting out from XCP-ng? So never actually hitting the Windows machine where the SMB SR lives?
What could be causing that?
-
Northing weird getting blocked on XCP-ng firewall for outbound connections
iptables -L Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination xapi_nbd_input_chain tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:nbd ACCEPT gre -- anywhere anywhere ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:rtps-dd-mt RH-Firewall-1-INPUT all -- anywhere anywhere ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:rtps-dd-mt Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination RH-Firewall-1-INPUT all -- anywhere anywhere Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination xapi_nbd_output_chain tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp spt:nbd Chain RH-Firewall-1-INPUT (2 references) target prot opt source destination ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere ACCEPT icmp -- anywhere anywhere icmp any ACCEPT udp -- anywhere anywhere udp dpt:bootps ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED ACCEPT udp -- anywhere anywhere ctstate NEW udp dpt:ha-cluster ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere ctstate NEW tcp dpt:ssh ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere ctstate NEW tcp dpt:http ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere ctstate NEW tcp dpt:https ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:21064 ACCEPT udp -- anywhere anywhere multiport dports hpoms-dps-lstn,netsupport REJECT all -- anywhere anywhere reject-with icmp-host-prohibited Chain xapi_nbd_input_chain (1 references) target prot opt source destination REJECT all -- anywhere anywhere reject-with icmp-port-unreachable Chain xapi_nbd_output_chain (1 references) target prot opt source destination REJECT all -- anywhere anywhere reject-with icmp-port-unreachableAll the above is just out of the box default, no additional configurations.
-
Various similar issues I've spotted on Reddit re. Windows updates breaking SMB Mounts over the last 12-18 months with updates. Impossible to track down the specifics so not even going to bother.
Then found this issue too, https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/10545/long-delays-at-46-when-creating-or-starting-a-new-vm
Which was solved by moving from SMB Mount to NFS Mount.
That isn't going to work with my infrastructure setup as the Windows machine is on a Home Edition, and NFS is only supported on Business or Enterprise edition.
As it stands right now, and given nothing I've tried to get the SMB Mount to work again, feels like I'm at a dead end to get this fixed. Looking like I'll need to re-address the architecture for storing the ISOs and one of the backup routes (thankfully there are many types of backups in place for redundancy)
Not the end of the world, but a tad annoying which feels like it's probably a Windows update that broke this with one of the almost daily automated updates/shutdowns/restarts that kicks in. Only started happening yesterday, all previous backups via the SR were working fine until then. That's the only thing I can put this down to really.
-
Bit more info.....
The issue reading up on this appears to be related to SMB v1, which is commonly referred to as "Insecure" (More like Less Secure if we're being accurate.....)
I've just run the following on the Windows machine where the SMB Shares live via Powershell (as an Admin)
Get-WindowsOptionalFeature -Online -FeatureName SMB1ProtocolWhich has clarified that this is currently running, which throws a spanner in the works as I was expecting that to be Disabled, which would back up the theory in the previous comment.
FeatureName : SMB1Protocol DisplayName : SMB 1.0/CIFS File Sharing Support Description : Support for the SMB 1.0/CIFS file sharing protocol and the Computer Browser protocol. RestartRequired : Possible State : Enabled CustomProperties : ServerComponent\Description : Support for the SMB 1.0/CIFS file sharing protocol and the Computer Browser protocol. ServerComponent\DisplayName : SMB 1.0/CIFS File Sharing Support ServerComponent\Id : 487 ServerComponent\Type : Feature ServerComponent\UniqueName : FS-SMB1 ServerComponent\Deploys\Update\Name : SMB1Protocol -
SMB v2 + 3 are also turned on;
Get-SmbServerConfiguration | Select EnableSMB2ProtocolWhich outputs
EnableSMB2Protocol ------------------ True -
I would restart the xcp-ng tool stack or do a rolling pool reboot.
Since your SR is hosted on Windows, I might uninstall the last updates and see if things start working. Then make a plan to move storage to Truenas.
-
Solved.....
Turns out that everything above was basically a red herring.....
After a lot of playing around with the carrot and stick, noticed a lot of Tasks in XOA just getting stuck at 0%, the kinds of Tasks that usually just appear and disappear in no-time, to the point that you just don't even notice they are happening really. Something just felt off.
Multiple restarts of the following command when SSH'ing into the XCP-ng Server
xe-toolstack-restartIt cleared the Task list in XOA, but things just started to back up again with no obvious insights into what was really going on. I did notice the Progress % Bar wasn't showing up though, that was odd....
Anyhow, after all this "fun" I decided to give the server a physical kick, aka. a Manual Hard Power-Off and Power-On.
Low and behold, the age-old IT solution of turning it off and back on again has solved everything magically
#FFS 
Hopefully the above self-documenting debugging process helps future readers (myself included, more than likely)
Anyhow, just a thought @olivierlambert @greg_e - I've clearly no idea what fell over under the hood here, you guys probably have much more of an insight into this than I do - So the question is.....
-
What went on here? (gut feel)
-
What insights could be surfaced to the user of XOA/XO to help debug these things?
-
What friendly error messages could be added to help with #2 etc.
Kind of rhetorical questions really, so just adding some thoughts for future product development.
Personally, my gut feel here is that it's probably some low level Linux service/package/driver/etc. that fell over and didn't auto-recover - and XOA/XO had no way of detecting what had happened and hence was just a bit blind so seemed to go a bit wacky.
If it helps to improve the platform, happy to have a private DM or in this thread re. any kinds of commands I can run on said server to see if it can help pinpoint what failed (if logs persisted after a hard reboot) - it'll mean more to you than me the outputs of said commands.
-
-
@Greg_E Looks like you were writing a reply as I was...
But yeah, Truenas is on the roadmap at some point in the future, once I've had the time to dig into the details and understand where this fits in the overall system architecture.
Out of interest though, where would you see Truenas fitting in with this setup outlined below?
My initial thoughts are that Truenas in this context would be either;
- A glorified USB Stick storing ISOs
- A glorified (RAID Redundant) of an External HDD running as the Backup platform
- Or both of the above
Have I understood that context correctly?
Current setup is essentially.....
- Bare Metal
-
- HBA Raid Controllers for Storage
-
-
- Primary Raid Array
-
-
-
- Backup Raid Array
-
-
- Dom0
-
-
- XCP-ng Server
-
-
- DomU
-
-
- XOA VM
-
-
-
-
- Backups; Primary Raid Array -> Backup Raid Array
-
-
-
-
-
- Backups; Primary Raid Array -> Remote PC
-
-
-
-
-
- Backups; Primary Raid Array -> Dom0
-
-
- Remote PC
-
- ISOs via SMB Share
Truenas in the above context would simply be an additional backup to either;
- A Truenas VM on the Base Metal as a VM
- A physically separate Bare Metal running Truenas (aka. a glorified RAID'ed External USB Disk).
Is that where you would see things fitting into the overall system architecture?
Curious to get your thoughts on that.....
-
My Truenas runs on bare metal, I have smb SR for iso, NFS SR for VMs, another smb for VMs.
In production I have a second old Truenas that that has smb and nfs that I use for storage updates, migrate from faster to slower storage which is still generally enough for my needs, update Truenas, migrate back to faster. I also have a third Truenas that has user data, but it's big so I set up a backup remote smb to spread out my disaster footprint.
In my lab is just a single bare metal Truenas with whatever kind of share I need. Generally just smh and nfs or iso and vm.
Both systems run three XCP-ng hosts so I can do things like rolling pool updates with no VM downtime. RPU is genius, all automated, just click a button and watch VMs move and hosts reboot.
