XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Just FYI: current update seams to break NUT dependancies

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved XCP-ng
    18 Posts 10 Posters 378 Views 9 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • F Offline
      FritzGerald @stormi
      last edited by

      This post is deleted!
      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • F Offline
        FritzGerald @stormi
        last edited by

        @stormi said:

        @bogikornel said:

        @FritzGerald workaround

        yum update --exclude=net-snmp*
        

        This is dangerous.

        @stormi Do you see any immediate threat? I am asking since it is working so far for me

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • P Online
          ph7
          last edited by

          You can install nut on a separate (small) machine and let it ssh to Your master and run a shutdown script.
          That's how I do it since a while back when the NUT-package was temporarily removed from the extra repo

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D Offline
            DustinB @rzr
            last edited by

            @rzr said:

            Yes this "extra" tool was not (never?) supported ,

            NUT has never been supported in XCP-ng, it has been asked about for a long time though and a lot of people handle XCP-ng not as an appliance but as any other Server/Desktop system and install packages because they aren't blocked from doing so

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J Offline
              JeffBerntsen Top contributor @rzr
              last edited by

              @rzr @stormi @olivierlambert Please consider this such a request. NUT's functionality at the small system/appliance level (i.e. not datacenter) of use is too useful to ignore but not enough to build a dedicated VM for on systems/appliances with limited resources.

              okynnorO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • okynnorO Offline
                okynnor @JeffBerntsen
                last edited by

                I second this request.

                D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • D Offline
                  DustinB @okynnor
                  last edited by

                  https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/11967/gracefull-shutdown-of-host-when-ups-battery-runs-low

                  Not a great response, if this is really a need paying customers should go and put a request in on the ticketing side.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • F Offline
                    fbellosoa
                    last edited by

                    In case my experience can help with this problem:

                    The package causing compatibility issues is nut, but nut-client works and allows the xcp-ng hosts update.

                    I installed nut-client and defined the pool hosts as clients, with my nut server on a Truenas server.

                    This installation is working and has allowed me to continue using nut on my hosts.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • rzrR Offline
                      rzr Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                      last edited by rzr

                      Hi, I had a look at it and may have something to be tested soon (TBC https://github.com/xcp-ng-rpms/nut/pull/1 )

                      Is any of you volunteering for testing an extra (unsupported?) package ?
                      Or if the client is enough maybe we can put this on hold unless there is more traction?

                      Reminder: https://docs.xcp-ng.org/management/additional-packages/

                      rzr opened this pull request in xcp-ng-rpms/nut

                      draft Import nut-2.8.0 Rebuild with updated neon (with updated gnutls) Xcpng 3059/8.3 #1

                      F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • F Offline
                        FritzGerald @rzr
                        last edited by

                        @rzr Hi. Thank you very much. I will be setting up a new server within the next 2 weeks and will definitely test it. Then I will give you feedback! Thank you again for picking it up!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        • First post
                          Last post