Just FYI: current update seams to break NUT dependancies
-
Just a short informational update. Current xcp-ng update seems to break nut dependancies.
Error: Package: nut-2.8.0-2.el7.x86_64 (@epel) Requires: libnetsnmp.so.31()(64bit) Removing: 1:net-snmp-libs-5.7.2-52.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64 (@xcp-ng-updates) libnetsnmp.so.31()(64bit) Updated By: 1:net-snmp-libs-5.9.3-8.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64 (xcp-ng-updates) ~libnetsnmp.so.40()(64bit) Available: 1:net-snmp-libs-5.7.2-33.el7_5.2.x86_64 (xcp-ng-base) libnetsnmp.so.31()(64bit) Available: 1:net-snmp-libs-5.7.2-51.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64 (xcp-ng-base) libnetsnmp.so.31()(64bit) Available: 1:net-snmp-libs-5.7.2-51.2.xcpng8.3.x86_64 (xcp-ng-base) libnetsnmp.so.31()(64bit) Available: 1:net-snmp-libs-5.7.2-51.3.xcpng8.3.x86_64 (xcp-ng-base) libnetsnmp.so.31()(64bit)Since NUT is an "external" package and everyone was warned about installing "3rd-party" packages, this is not an official xcp-ng problem. I have not yet found a workaround. Since the old repos EPEL 7 are not really updated, it could get tricky. I just wanted to let you know.
-
@FritzGerald workaround
yum update --exclude=net-snmp* -
yum update --exclude=net-snmp*
You made my day. Works fine and I have learned something new. Thank you for your quick help!
-
I'm having the same problem. I could never get NUT to work properly anyways. What's the best way to uinstal it?
-
It looks like "yum remove nut" does the trick.
-
P ph7 referenced this topic
-
It looks like "yum remove nut" does the trick.
Yes this "extra" tool was not (never?) supported ,
If you really need it, there are 2 options to consider:
- 1st is convince us to add it to the distro
- 2d rebuild it yourself (to link with updated dep, and also rebuild its deps like neon)
-
@FritzGerald workaround
yum update --exclude=net-snmp*This is dangerous.
-
@rzr
Hi, thank you for having a look.Regarding point 1.)
As it was written by Olivier Lambert in post https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/10250/what-os-is-xcp-ng-8-3-based-on/8?_=1773671654080 I understand that your focus is on datacenter usage. Nevertheless I still think - and in other posts users mention it as well - there are quite a lot small non-datacenter - installations in place that use xcp-ng in small office structures using and needing an USV, since it simply essential. I love using XCP-NG and believe it would be a goodie that would make a lot small open source supporters like me very happy.Regarding point 2.)
I am always careful when interfering with "mighty" tools like hypervisors. My experience is that my knowledge is unfortunately to small to see all caveats. -
This post is deleted! -
@FritzGerald workaround
yum update --exclude=net-snmp*This is dangerous.
@stormi Do you see any immediate threat? I am asking since it is working so far for me
-
You can install nut on a separate (small) machine and let it
sshto Your master and run a shutdown script.
That's how I do it since a while back when the NUT-package was temporarily removed from the extra repo -
Yes this "extra" tool was not (never?) supported ,
NUT has never been supported in XCP-ng, it has been asked about for a long time though and a lot of people handle XCP-ng not as an appliance but as any other Server/Desktop system and install packages because they aren't blocked from doing so
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login