XCP-ng

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups

    XCP-ng 8.0.0 Beta now available!

    News
    24
    123
    33846
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stormi
      stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team πŸš€ last edited by stormi

      zfs is not part of the default installation, so you need to install it manually using yum from our repositories. Documentation on the wiki has not been updated yet for 8.0: https://github.com/xcp-ng/xcp/wiki/ZFS-on-XCP-ng
      Now the zfs packages are directly in our main repositories, no need to add extra --enablerepo options. Just yum install zfs.

      I've just built an updated zfs package (new major version 0.8.0 instead of the 0.7.3 that was initially available in the repos for the beta) in the hope that it solves some of the issues we had with previous versions (such as VDI export or the need to patch some packages to remove the use of O_DIRECT). I'm just waiting for the main mirror to sync to test that it installs fine.

      A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • A
        AllooTikeeChaat @stormi last edited by

        @stormi Thanks for the quick reply .. tried the yum install zfs and it errors with the following:

        75afeaef-9101-4357-9f6e-f257e35cab8d-image.png

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stormi
          stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team πŸš€ last edited by

          That's why I told that I'm waiting for the main mirror to sync πŸ™‚
          And the build machine is having a "I'm feeling all slow" moment.

          A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A
            AllooTikeeChaat @stormi last edited by

            @stormi Ok..... silly me .. will wait for you to give the aok.

            stormi 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stormi
              stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team πŸš€ @AllooTikeeChaat last edited by

              @AllooTikeeChaat You can now try.

              A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A
                AllooTikeeChaat @stormi last edited by

                @stormi still broken .. same error

                2af95434-078c-4afd-9fab-9e9b20efad5d-image.png

                stormi 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stormi
                  stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team πŸš€ @AllooTikeeChaat last edited by

                  @AllooTikeeChaat yum considers that your medata are recent enough. Ask it to clean them: yum clean all.

                  A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • A
                    AllooTikeeChaat @stormi last edited by AllooTikeeChaat

                    @stormi yum clean all worked. Installed aok and modprobe zfs doesn't complain so that's all good.

                    A repair of the ZFS SR fails with the same error and "zpool status: no pools available" and "zfs list no datasets available".

                    I'll open a new post if I can't get it working rather than replying to this one.

                    Update: fixed the issue ..

                    bad2f941-78f1-482b-ae10-a663b4a01928-image.png

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • olivierlambert
                      olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder🦸 CEO πŸ§‘β€πŸ’Ό last edited by

                      Which was? (the issue)

                      A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • A
                        AllooTikeeChaat @olivierlambert last edited by

                        @olivierlambert
                        (1) Missing the ZFS packages from the base install.
                        (2) Needed a "yum clean all" to be able to install zfs packages.
                        (3) Needed to manually import the ZFS zpool

                        I'm a noob with zfs so had to work out how to import an existing zpool and once thats done it can be repaired/mounted.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • olivierlambert
                          olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder🦸 CEO πŸ§‘β€πŸ’Ό last edited by

                          Good πŸ™‚ So now you are on ZoL 0.8, no need to disable sync anymore πŸ™‚

                          A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • A
                            AllooTikeeChaat @olivierlambert last edited by

                            @olivierlambert
                            I'm assuming that sync is enabled by default ?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • olivierlambert
                              olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder🦸 CEO πŸ§‘β€πŸ’Ό last edited by

                              Yup, but before (0.8) it wasn't good for performances, at all, due to cache poisoning (no O_DIRECT support).

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • C
                                cocoon XCP-ng Center Team 🏚️ last edited by

                                Any chance to get a newer lsblk that supports json output?
                                Would be great for plugins and would make parsing output much easier.

                                Currently installed on XCP-ng 8 beta: util-linux-2.23.2-52.el7_5.1.x86_64

                                (something later than v2.27?)
                                https://git.devuan.org/CenturionDan/util-linux/commit/4a102a4871fdb415f4de5af9ffb7a2fb8926b5d1

                                ... ah forget it, I see, CentOS is using the old versions since long time ...

                                stormi 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • stormi
                                  stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team πŸš€ @cocoon last edited by

                                  @cocoon said in XCP-ng 8.0.0 Beta now available!:

                                  ... ah forget it, I see, CentOS is using the old versions since long time ...

                                  Yeah the chances that we'd change the version of such a low level package just for added functionality are very low.

                                  C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • C
                                    cocoon XCP-ng Center Team 🏚️ @stormi last edited by

                                    @stormi yes and I totally understand that ... I just thought at first, it is so old, there must be something new if CentOS 7.5 is new ... but no πŸ˜•

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • akurzawa
                                      akurzawa last edited by

                                      hi

                                      Is this possible to install xcp-ng in xcp-ng just for tests?

                                      borzel 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • ruskofd
                                        ruskofd last edited by

                                        Sure you need to enable Nested Virtualization when you create your VM and that's it.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • borzel
                                          borzel XCP-ng Center Team 🏚️ @akurzawa last edited by

                                          @akurzawa https://github.com/xcp-ng/xcp/wiki/Testing-XCP-ng-in-Virtual-Machine-(Nested-Virtualization)

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • ruskofd
                                            ruskofd last edited by

                                            Just updated my homelab server from XCP-ng 7.6 to XCP-ng 8.0 Beta, so far so good. I also tested the new experimental UEFI mode with Windows VM, seems good too.

                                            I also tested the new XOA deployment through the Web interface of my host, perfect !

                                            We will see during the following week how it goes πŸ˜‰

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post