XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    [DEPRECATED] SMAPIv3 - Feedback & Bug reports

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
    75 Posts 20 Posters 29.3k Views 19 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • olivierlambertO Offline
      olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
      last edited by

      Why do you think it will be the next LTSR?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C Offline
        cg
        last edited by

        IIRC they said this year should bring another LTSR - as the old one becomes quite old now. The last chance would be a release in Q4 - that would also fit for 7.1 LTSR -> 8.1 LTSR (basically making 8.0 evolutions mature/tested)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • olivierlambertO Offline
          olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
          last edited by

          Do you remember where you read this?

          A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A Offline
            AllooTikeeChaat @olivierlambert
            last edited by

            @olivierlambert

            Citrix, have recently announced via blog post that the next reported XenApp/XenDesktop LTSR release is due end Q4 2019 so its possible CH8.1 might show up at the same time.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • olivierlambertO Offline
              olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
              last edited by

              Damn I probably missed that post, can you put the URL here please?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C Offline
                cg
                last edited by

                They removed the Hypervisor tag from their blog, so finding that posts isn't easy anmore and CH/XS posts get lost in stuff I don't care about.

                Looks a bit like they only want to keep it because VMware Horizon becomes more attractive, if Citrix doesn't bring it's own HV for XenApp/XenDesktop for free.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • olivierlambertO Offline
                  olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                  last edited by

                  Citrix want to keep their HV/platform because they don't want to rely only on competitors to run XenApp/XenDesktop. It's just not a "product" but a technical part of their solution.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • olivierlambertO Offline
                    olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                    last edited by

                    I can't find anything on this blog πŸ˜•

                    A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A Offline
                      AllooTikeeChaat @olivierlambert
                      last edited by

                      @olivierlambert

                      Its all about XA/XD I'm afraid but it does state year end 2019 for the next LTSR.

                      https://www.citrix.com/blogs/2019/09/19/whats-new-with-citrix-virtual-apps-and-desktops-september-2019/

                      "Long-Term Service Release News

                      For those of you on 7.15 LTSR β€” one of our most popular releases β€” we have some exciting news about our next LTSR availability. We’re planning our next LTSR for year-end."

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C Offline
                        cg
                        last edited by

                        Somewhere they said they want to algin numbers and XA/XD LTRS only makes sense on a fitting CH LTSR.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • olivierlambertO Offline
                          olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                          last edited by

                          Hmm okay so it's not written directly. We'll see soon enough πŸ™‚

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • C Offline
                            cocoon XCP-ng Center Team
                            last edited by

                            Hi, is the "raw-device-plugin" branch already working?
                            https://github.com/xcp-ng/xcp-ng-xapi-storage/tree/feat/raw-device-plugin

                            I just upgraded to 8.0 and wanted to try it now and found out, that the latest released package is v1.0.2 and is missing the raw-device.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • olivierlambertO Offline
                              olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                              last edited by

                              @ronan-a is still working on it, and he's in the middle of a load of tests/benchs.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • C Offline
                                cocoon XCP-ng Center Team
                                last edited by

                                OK thanks, so I better should wait a bit before I try anything?

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • olivierlambertO Offline
                                  olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                                  last edited by

                                  Exactly.

                                  R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • R Offline
                                    ravenet @olivierlambert
                                    last edited by

                                    @olivierlambert @ronan-a Has there been any update on this development? I do see an update to master in org.xen.xapi.storage.raw-device from feb 2020. is it more safe to test now?

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • olivierlambertO Offline
                                      olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                                      last edited by

                                      SMAPIv3 isn't production ready yet (we aren't really happy with the current state of it). Also because we are working on LINSTOR storage with LINBIT, it takes a lot of our storage R&D/resources right now. We can't be everywhere, so we have to prioritize…

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • R Offline
                                        ravenet
                                        last edited by

                                        Ok, thanks for the update. Wasn't expecting production ready, was just curious on status and if was safe to run tests with it which sounds like not.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • R Offline
                                          ravenet
                                          last edited by

                                          I see movement in the github repo again. Good sign!

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • mdavicoM Offline
                                            mdavico
                                            last edited by

                                            Is there anything new with SMAPIv3?

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post