XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Alert: Control Domain Memory Usage

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Compute
    194 Posts 21 Posters 200.6k Views 16 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • olivierlambertO Offline
      olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
      last edited by

      That's really likely the problem all along.

      See https://sourceforge.net/p/e1000/bugs/633/#af80/154d

      So our alt driver is indeed fixing it πŸ™‚

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • M Offline
        MrMike
        last edited by

        Good job guys!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • olivierlambertO Offline
          olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
          last edited by

          A big thanks for the link that @andyhhp provided to confirm the problem πŸ™‚

          delafD D 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • delafD Offline
            delaf @olivierlambert
            last edited by

            I have installed intel-ixgbe-alt-5.9.4-1.xcpng8.1.x86_64 on my server (268).
            I'll check in some days if I still have the problem or not.

            Thank you guys!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D Offline
              daKju @olivierlambert
              last edited by

              @olivierlambert is there a plan to deploy the alt-driver over the xcp-ng update or should we installed by the xcp-ng-testing repo?
              THX for the good job guys πŸ‘ 😊

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stormiS Offline
                stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team
                last edited by

                I'm going to build a driver package that only has the patch that is thought to fix the memory issue and let everyone here test it. If the results are good, then it will become an official update.

                delafD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • delafD Offline
                  delaf @stormi
                  last edited by delaf

                  @stormi
                  Screenshot 2021-03-04 at 21.21.16.png
                  The 2 servers have been reinstalled with an up to date 8.2. They host each 2 VMs that are doing the same thing (~100Mb/s of netdata stream).

                  The right one has the 5.9.4-1.xcpng8.2, the left one has 5.5.2-2.xcpng8.2.

                  The patch seem to be OK for me.

                  J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • stormiS Offline
                    stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team
                    last edited by

                    Announcement

                    Here's an updated ixgbe driver package that is meant as an update candidate without updating to a higher version. If need all feedback we can get on this one, because this is the candidate for the official fix as would be delivered to everyone. Of course the intel-igb-alt will remain available for those who need a more recent driver, and I even moved it to the updates repository so that one doesn't need to add --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing to install it anymore.

                    To test the official update candidate on XCP-ng 8.1 or 8.2.

                    • If you had previously installed intel-ixgbe-alt:
                      • yum remove intel-ixgbe-alt -y
                      • Check that the /lib/modules/4.19.0+1/override/ixgbe.ko file was properly deleted. I've seen, once, a situation where a .ko file from an -alt package wasn't deleted, so I'm being cautious here and ask you to report you see that it is still present. In theory, this is impossible, but as I've seen it once I don't know anymore πŸ™‚
                      • Run depmod -a
                    • Update the intel-ixgbe package from the testing repo: yum update intel-ixgbe --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing
                    • Reboot

                    Note: I'm not 100% sure that I picked the right patch, nor that this patch alone is sufficient.

                    delafD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • delafD Offline
                      delaf @stormi
                      last edited by

                      @stormi I have installed intel-ixgbe 5.5.2-2.1.xcpng8.2 on my server s0267. Let's wait a some days to check if the memleak is solved by this patch.

                      delafD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • delafD Offline
                        delaf @delaf
                        last edited by

                        @stormi
                        It seems to be good here!

                        Screenshot 2021-03-09 at 08.36.50.png

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • olivierlambertO Offline
                          olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                          last edited by

                          So we found the good patch πŸ™‚ That was a really tricky issue to find!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stormiS Offline
                            stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team
                            last edited by stormi

                            Once again, an issue that was present in vendor drivers but not in the mainline kernel. It's becoming harder and harder to trust vendor drivers. But that's what they require for support...

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                            • F Offline
                              fasterfourier
                              last edited by olivierlambert

                              Our Citrix ticket has been worked and they concluded that the NIC driver is to blame here as well. They had us collect debug info using:

                              /opt/xensource/libexec/xen-cmdline --set-dom0 page_owner=on
                              

                              They then confirmed the memory leak was from the NIC driver. They are intending to release a public hotfix for this issue.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                              • olivierlambertO Offline
                                olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                                last edited by olivierlambert

                                Nice to see Citrix are also getting to the same conclusions πŸ™‚

                                edit: thanks @fasterfourier for your feedback!

                                F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • F Offline
                                  fasterfourier @olivierlambert
                                  last edited by

                                  @olivierlambert

                                  Official Citrix update has been posted: https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX306529

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                  • olivierlambertO Offline
                                    olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                                    last edited by

                                    \o/

                                    What I still find really weird is the fact we had report of the issue far longer before Citrix. And we had roughly 10 people affected while Citrix got only 1 report πŸ€”

                                    F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • F Offline
                                      fasterfourier @olivierlambert
                                      last edited by

                                      @olivierlambert

                                      Probably plenty of Citrix customers were affected, but they would rather reboot on schedule than spend months working through the support process πŸ™‚

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                      • olivierlambertO Offline
                                        olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                                        last edited by

                                        haha that might be the answer indeed…

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • J Offline
                                          JCastang
                                          last edited by

                                          Hello,

                                          Does this fix has been released or is to be released ?

                                          stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • stormiS Offline
                                            stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @JCastang
                                            last edited by

                                            @jcastang It is being tested and you can join the effort: yum update intel-ixgbe --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing. The results are very good, I just want a bit more feedback.

                                            J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post