XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Backup jobs run twice after upgrade to 5.76.2

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    35 Posts 5 Posters 5.5k Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • julien-fJ Offline
      julien-f Vates 🪐 Co-Founder XO Team
      last edited by

      @karlisi I've been unable to reproduce the issue so far, can you tell me which version of XO has the issue and which one does not?

      Also, if you could provide me with your job configuration it would be nice 🙂

      K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K Offline
        karlisi @julien-f
        last edited by

        @julien-f said in Backup jobs run twice after upgrade to 5.76.2:

        @karlisi I've been unable to reproduce the issue so far, can you tell me which version of XO has the issue and which one does not?

        Also, if you could provide me with your job configuration it would be nice 🙂

        Can I send it to you in PM?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • olivierlambertO Online
          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
          last edited by

          In this case, it's better that you open a ticket on xen-orchestra.com 🙂

          K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • K Offline
            karlisi @olivierlambert
            last edited by

            @olivierlambert Done

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • olivierlambertO Online
              olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
              last edited by

              Thanks a lot for this great ticket with all the context, this is really helpful! 👍

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • T Offline
                tts
                last edited by

                Hi,

                I can give a little update on our issues, but our 'workaround' is really time consuming.

                Besides the problem of randomly stuck CR jobs, which could be fixed mostly by:

                stop xo-server/ start xo-server (sometimes needed to restart xo-vm) and restart the interrupted jobs again and again until all VM are successfully backed up.

                Now without changing anything the jobs are again started twice again most of the time, but not always.

                I can not find a correlation to this.

                Somehow it looked that this could be fixed by dis/enabling the backup jobs, but as of now this doesn't make any difference.

                -Toni

                K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • K Offline
                  karlisi @tts
                  last edited by

                  @tts Are You on latest XOA version?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • T Offline
                    tts
                    last edited by

                    It wasn't XOA, we used xo-server from sources.

                    I planned to test with XOA but Olivier yesterday wrote that it's probably fixed upstream.

                    So I updated our installation to xo-server 5.57.3 / xo-web 5.57.1 and will see if it's fixed.

                    fingers crossed

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • T Offline
                      tts
                      last edited by

                      Maybe there are additional problems. I just noticed one of our rolling-snapshot task started twice again.

                      This time it's even more weird, both jobs are listed as successfull.

                      twice_run_jobs.png

                      The first job displays just nothing in the detail window:
                      job_details1.png
                      json:

                      {
                        "data": {
                          "mode": "full",
                          "reportWhen": "failure"
                        },
                        "id": "1583917200011",
                        "jobId": "22050542-f6ec-4437-a031-0600260197d7",
                        "jobName": "odoo_hourly",
                        "message": "backup",
                        "scheduleId": "ab9468b4-9b8a-44a0-83a8-fc6b84fe8a95",
                        "start": 1583917200011,
                        "status": "success",
                        "end": 1583917207066
                      }
                      

                      The second job shows 4? VMs but only consists of one VM which failed, but is displayed as successful
                      job_details2.png
                      json:

                      {
                        "data": {
                          "mode": "full",
                          "reportWhen": "failure"
                        },
                        "id": "1583917200014",
                        "jobId": "22050542-f6ec-4437-a031-0600260197d7",
                        "jobName": "odoo_hourly",
                        "message": "backup",
                        "scheduleId": "ab9468b4-9b8a-44a0-83a8-fc6b84fe8a95",
                        "start": 1583917200014,
                        "status": "success",
                        "tasks": [
                          {
                            "id": "1583917200019",
                            "message": "snapshot",
                            "start": 1583917200019,
                            "status": "success",
                            "end": 1583917201773,
                            "result": "32ba0201-26bd-6f29-c507-0416129058b4"
                          },
                          {
                            "id": "1583917201780",
                            "message": "add metadata to snapshot",
                            "start": 1583917201780,
                            "status": "success",
                            "end": 1583917201791
                          },
                          {
                            "id": "1583917206856",
                            "message": "waiting for uptodate snapshot record",
                            "start": 1583917206856,
                            "status": "success",
                            "end": 1583917207064
                          },
                          {
                            "data": {
                              "type": "VM",
                              "id": "b6b63fab-bd5f-8640-305d-3565361b213f"
                            },
                            "id": "1583917200022",
                            "message": "Starting backup of HALOffice01. (22050542-f6ec-4437-a031-0600260197d7)",
                            "start": 1583917200022,
                            "status": "failure",
                            "tasks": [
                              {
                                "id": "1583917200028",
                                "message": "snapshot",
                                "start": 1583917200028,
                                "status": "success",
                                "end": 1583917220144,
                                "result": "62e06abc-6fca-9564-aad7-7933dec90ba3"
                              },
                              {
                                "id": "1583917220148",
                                "message": "add metadata to snapshot",
                                "start": 1583917220148,
                                "status": "success",
                                "end": 1583917220167
                              }
                            ],
                            "end": 1583917220405,
                            "result": {
                              "message": "no object with UUID or opaque ref: 1536b84b-412d-07ad-2dcd-9db3162296e6",
                              "name": "Error",
                              "stack": "Error: no object with UUID or opaque ref: 1536b84b-412d-07ad-2dcd-9db3162296e6\n    at Xapi.apply (/opt/xen-orchestra/packages/xen-api/src/index.js:573:11)\n    at Xapi.getObject (/opt/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server/src/xapi/index.js:128:24)\n    at Xapi.deleteVm (/opt/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server/src/xapi/index.js:692:12)\n    at iteratee (/opt/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server/src/xo-mixins/backups-ng/index.js:1268:23)\n    at /opt/xen-orchestra/@xen-orchestra/async-map/src/index.js:32:17\n    at Promise._execute (/opt/xen-orchestra/node_modules/bluebird/js/release/debuggability.js:384:9)\n    at Promise._resolveFromExecutor (/opt/xen-orchestra/node_modules/bluebird/js/release/promise.js:518:18)\n    at new Promise (/opt/xen-orchestra/node_modules/bluebird/js/release/promise.js:103:10)\n    at /opt/xen-orchestra/@xen-orchestra/async-map/src/index.js:31:7\n    at arrayMap (/opt/xen-orchestra/node_modules/lodash/_arrayMap.js:16:21)\n    at map (/opt/xen-orchestra/node_modules/lodash/map.js:50:10)\n    at asyncMap (/opt/xen-orchestra/@xen-orchestra/async-map/src/index.js:30:5)\n    at BackupNg._backupVm (/opt/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server/src/xo-mixins/backups-ng/index.js:1265:13)\n    at runMicrotasks (<anonymous>)\n    at processTicksAndRejections (internal/process/task_queues.js:97:5)\n    at handleVm (/opt/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server/src/xo-mixins/backups-ng/index.js:734:13)"
                            }
                          }
                        ],
                        "end": 1583917207065
                      }
                      

                      So the results are clearly wrong, job is ran twice, this time at the same point in time.

                      Would it help to delete and recreate all of the backup jobs?
                      What extra information I could offer to get this issue fixed?

                      Already thinking about setting up another new xo-server from scratch now.

                      please help and advice,
                      thanks Toni

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • olivierlambertO Online
                        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                        last edited by

                        Please try with XOA and report if you have the same problem.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • T Offline
                          tts
                          last edited by

                          I'm currently on it, we did setup the XOA appliance recently. Just needs activating the trial phase, I think I can do that today in a few hours.

                          Can we import the settings safely from our current 'from sources' version or do we need to setup everything from scratch?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • olivierlambertO Online
                            olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                            last edited by olivierlambert

                            Yes you can import settings in XOA.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • T Offline
                              tts
                              last edited by

                              Ok thanks, will do that and report back later.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • T Offline
                                tts
                                last edited by

                                Looks like XOA on stable channel is only updating to v5.43.2,

                                I really don't get the point why 'rolling back' to a much older version could help solve the backup problems in the more recent version 'from sources' 5.56+?

                                Is this a completely different codebase?

                                Quite lost now!

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • olivierlambertO Online
                                  olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                  last edited by

                                  XOA got its own numbering, unrelated to xo-server or xo-web: it'a all a matter of a coherent "whole", including dependencies etc. Thing we can't provide when built on sources.

                                  Please test and report 🙂 You can switch to latest too, doesn't matter.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • First post
                                    Last post