XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.2 updates announcements and testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    703 Posts 67 Posters 1.1m Views 86 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • _danielgurgel_ Offline
      _danielgurgel
      last edited by

      @stormi the update actually solves the problem of zombies process, but the coalesce, all disks after backup/snapshot (removal) still continue with a 1 disk stuck in the leaf chain.

      I am also testing the update made available in https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX265619 in an XS 7.1 pool.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stormiS Offline
        stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
        last edited by

        I'm interested in the results because it's the same patch!

        _danielgurgel_ 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • _danielgurgel_ Offline
          _danielgurgel @stormi
          last edited by

          @stormi The perception I have is as follows in XCP8:

          • After backup, all the disks were left with 1 disk frozen in the leaf tree.
          • Even pausing the VM and rescanning disk, the coalesce process does not start.

          For CH7.1 with the XS71ECU2020 update, the coalesce process completed 100% by pausing the VMs. We will now re-back it up and see if the coalesce runs again 100%.

          I used standard times in LIVE_LEAF_COALESCE_TIMEOUT=10.
          The new test will be with LIVE_LEAF_COALESCE_TIMEOUT=300.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • _danielgurgel_ Offline
            _danielgurgel @stormi
            last edited by _danielgurgel

            @stormi The strange thing is, I had to turn off the VMs, rescan disk and then turn on again.

            The coalesce process began with the linked VMs (in production) and successfully completed. The following values have been changed at /opt/xensource/sm/cleanup.py :

            LIVE_LEAF_COALESCE_MAX_SIZE = 1024 * 1024 * 1024 # bytes
            LIVE_LEAF_COALESCE_TIMEOUT = 300 # seconds
            

            Well, apparently everything ok... we will see in our next backup if it will be necessary to turn off the VMs for the coalesce to start and complete correctly.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • _danielgurgel_ Offline
              _danielgurgel @stormi
              last edited by

              @stormi After the informed change, the backup occurred with 100% success, on no disk in the coalesce chain.

              We're migrating another cluster to XCP-ng 8!
              Thanks for the support, quick return and attention.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • stormiS Offline
                stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                last edited by

                A new update just pushed for XCP-ng 8.0: xcp-ng-xapi-plugins. It adds a plugin that the latest version of Xen Orchestra (just released) needs in order to offer a new feature: integration of netdata for all hosts into a single interface. See the blog post.

                If xcp-ng-xapi-plugins is the only update available for your hosts, then no need to reboot after installing. A toolstack restart is enough.

                If you don't need the new feature, you can skip this update until the next batch.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stormiS Offline
                  stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                  last edited by

                  New security update candidate for testing in XCP-ng 8.0 and 7.6.

                  Fixes security issues in Xen. Also provides updated microcode for some Intel

                  Details and discussion on https://github.com/xcp-ng/xcp/issues/319

                  Please test (we simply need people to install them and check that they do not see obvious regressions).

                  stormi created this issue in xcp-ng/xcp

                  closed Xen and microcode security update (December 12th) #319

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                  • stormiS Offline
                    stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                    last edited by

                    Update published: https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2019/12/16/xen-and-intel-microcode-security-updates/

                    B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • B Offline
                      brooktini86 @stormi
                      last edited by

                      This post is deleted!
                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stormiS Offline
                        stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                        last edited by

                        This post is deleted!
                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • akurzawaA Offline
                          akurzawa
                          last edited by akurzawa

                          Hi

                          I've a problem with freezing Windows VMs after applaying latest updates - do You know anything about it? Those vms have guest tools from citrix.

                          D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stormiS Offline
                            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                            last edited by

                            I haven't heard of it until now.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • D Offline
                              DreDay @akurzawa
                              last edited by DreDay

                              @akurzawa I also experienced an issue after the update as well. After the host rebooted and I tried turning on a Windows 10 VM it hung on the Windows boot screen.

                              • I eventually force rebooted

                              • Force shutdown + Change CPU and RAM (not sure if the resource adjustments helped of not)

                              • Start VM and it came up in Windows recovery mode

                              In the windows recovery mode I just exited and it continued the boot process. This time it booted successfully but I was greeted with the below message upon login.
                              6c585cde-511c-453e-85e7-ebc9b4156ad3-image.png

                              I had to use XCP-ng center to use keyboard shortcuts to select yes on the dialog box as mouse input was not working. After the restart everything is working as usual again.

                              I also have the Windows Updates based guest tools enabled on this VM.

                              @stormi I think this has to do with the new version of guest tools Citrix has pushed from their release of CH8.1. Checking the services they now show major version 9. Not sure if @akurzawa is facing the exact same issue or a variant of it?

                              eeddbde4-3b35-42c9-a108-c331a5d74dee-image.png

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • borzelB Offline
                                borzel XCP-ng Center Team
                                last edited by

                                This smells like windows pv drivers upgrades. Had similiar effects on various VMs.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • stormiS Offline
                                  stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                  last edited by

                                  FYI: https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX235404

                                  "Important: Updating to this version of the driver removes the quiesced snapshots capability of the VM. If you are using quiesced snapshots and wish to retain this functionality, do not adopt these 9.0.0.x drivers."

                                  They do not tell about crashing VMs though 🙂

                                  D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • C Offline
                                    cg
                                    last edited by cg

                                    Citrix also has a long history of problematic VM guest-tools. Race conditions with broken drivers, unbootable VMs, broken agents... It's a pain in the a**.
                                    If you like your VMs: Always make a snapshot of every VM before updating the tools.

                                    Is known why they remove the VSS-functionality? I don't get why they remove features (again).

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • D Offline
                                      DreDay @stormi
                                      last edited by

                                      @stormi said in Updates announcements and testing:

                                      FYI: https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX235404

                                      "Important: Updating to this version of the driver removes the quiesced snapshots capability of the VM. If you are using quiesced snapshots and wish to retain this functionality, do not adopt these 9.0.0.x drivers."

                                      They do not tell about crashing VMs though 🙂

                                      I read the support article hoping for more details on how to "...retain this functionality, do not adopt these 9.0.0.x drivers." but the article does not mention that either.

                                      I did not opt to install the new guest tools at any point. I only shutdown the VM to complete the host patches.
                                      Also see the image below, unless it installs guest tools through a side channel that does not show in the Windows updates history.ceaefbc8-6188-43c7-a985-09f5936047fb-image.png

                                      Would simply disabling the "Windows Update tools" advanced option in XOA/XO stop it from adopting the new guest tools?

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • stormiS Offline
                                        stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                        last edited by

                                        I have pushed an update to the netdata and netdata-ui packages.

                                        No need to reboot after installing it even if XO tells you so.

                                        It fixes an upstream issue where in some cases the cache size on disk grows indefinitely without respecting the 256M default limit (reproduced only internally but I don't want to take a risk). Only netdata-ui is concerned. If you are using netdata through XO, then there's no risk for your hosts. Now netdata will only store 1h of data in RAM, nothing on disk.

                                        As usual: https://github.com/xcp-ng/xcp/wiki/Updates-Howto

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • stormiS Offline
                                          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                          last edited by

                                          I have pushed an updated bnxt_en driver as broadcom-bnxt-en-alt for 8.0 and 8.1. It is in xcp-ng-testing for 8.0. If fixes a very specific issue from what I can see in the code diff, so no need to install it if everything is already OK for you.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • stormiS Offline
                                            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                            last edited by

                                            By the way, is anyone interested (and why) in updated drivers for cisco-enic and cisco-fnic?

                                            O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post