XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Kuberenets cluster recipe not happy

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    49 Posts 5 Posters 13.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P
      pnunn
      last edited by

      Hy Guys,

      just having a look at the new kubernetes cluster creation (was about to start trying microk8s when I found this good stuff).

      I have run the creation, got the master and three workers running, got the green finished popup (after a long time) and can log into the master and nodes happily, however,

      kubectl get nodes (on the master) gives me
      The connection to the server localhost:8080 was refused - did you specify the right host or port?

      Not sure where to go from here to be honest.

      Peter.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • olivierlambertO
        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
        last edited by

        Hi,

        This is something for @BenjiReis

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • BenjiReisB
          BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
          last edited by

          Hi! The kube nodes communicate with the master with port 6433.

          I don't understand the error message.

          Can you try running on all nodes and master:

           - update-alternatives --set iptables /usr/sbin/iptables-legacy
 - update-alternatives --set ip6tables /usr/sbin/ip6tables-legacy

          and reboot your Kubernetes nodes and master?

          P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P
            pnunn @BenjiReis
            last edited by

            @benjireis I did all of that... (with sudo first)... same result though.

            Do you want me to start a ticket and a tunnel?

            Peter.

            BenjiReisB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • BenjiReisB
              BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @pnunn
              last edited by BenjiReis

              @pnunn Yeah please open a ticket and a tunnel, I'll have a look.

              Please make sure to add the xoa ssh key to the VMs so I can ssh to the nodes and master.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M
                mathiashedberg
                last edited by

                Hi!

                I had a similar issue, however i noticed that the k8s VMs created were based on a snapshot of a different VM i had running on the system. So in turn i ended up with a bunch of clones of a completely different VM.

                This VM that the new k8s VMs were based on, was created based off the Debian 10 template. New VMs created with the debian 10 template work fine, however only the k8s recipe ends up basing the image on this existing VM.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • BenjiReisB
                  BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                  last edited by

                  A new version has been released last week or so that solves issues in the recipe.
                  Did you encounter any issue with latest xoa?

                  M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M
                    mathiashedberg @BenjiReis
                    last edited by

                    @benjireis
                    Yes currently the issue is with version 5.54.0. Tested about an hour ago

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • BenjiReisB
                      BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                      last edited by

                      Latest XOA is 5.55.1, can you try with this version?

                      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M
                        mathiashedberg @BenjiReis
                        last edited by mathiashedberg

                        @benjireis
                        Looks like that fixed that issue. Now there is an issue with the cloud-config. Seems like gnupg2 is not installed

                        sudo systemctl status cloud-final.service
● cloud-final.service - Execute cloud user/final scripts
   Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/cloud-final.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
   Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Mon 2021-02-15 09:20:37 EST; 5min ago
  Process: 649 ExecStart=/usr/bin/cloud-init modules --mode=final (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)
 Main PID: 649 (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)

                        Relevant snippet: I could send you the whole snippet from sudo journalctl -u cloud-final.service if you would like

                        Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]: 0 added, 0 removed; done.
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Running hooks in /etc/ca-certificates/update.d...
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]: done.
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Errors were encountered while processing:
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]:  linux-image-4.19.0-14-amd64
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]:  linux-image-amd64
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]: FATAL -> Failed to fork.
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Cloud-init v. 18.3 running 'modules:final' at Mon, 15 Feb 2021 14:19:26 +0000. Up 15.00 seconds.
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]: 2021-02-15 14:20:34,984 - util.py[WARNING]: Package upgrade failed
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Reading package lists...FATAL -> Failed to fork.
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: 2021-02-15 14:20:35,124 - util.py[WARNING]: Failed to install packages: ['apt-transport-https', 'ca-certificates', 'curl', 'gnupg2', 'software-properties-common']
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: 2021-02-15 14:20:35,127 - cc_package_update_upgrade_install.py[WARNING]: 2 failed with exceptions, re-raising the last one
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: 2021-02-15 14:20:35,128 - util.py[WARNING]: Running module package-update-upgrade-install (<module 'cloudinit.config.cc_package_update_upgrade_install' from '/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cloudinit/config/cc_package_update_upgrade_in
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: 2: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: curl: not found
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 sudo[17486]:     root : TTY=unknown ; PWD=/ ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/usr/bin/apt-key add -
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 sudo[17486]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session opened for user root by (uid=0)
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: E: gnupg, gnupg2 and gnupg1 do not seem to be installed, but one of them is required for this operation
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: 3: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: curl: not found
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 sudo[17486]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session closed for user root
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 sudo[17505]:     root : TTY=unknown ; PWD=/ ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/usr/bin/apt-key add -
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 sudo[17505]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session opened for user root by (uid=0)
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: E: gnupg, gnupg2 and gnupg1 do not seem to be installed, but one of them is required for this operation
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: 4: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: add-apt-repository: not found
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: 5: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: add-apt-repository: not found
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 sudo[17505]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session closed for user root
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Hit:1 http://security.debian.org buster/updates InRelease
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Hit:2 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster InRelease
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Hit:3 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster-updates InRelease
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Hit:4 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster-backports InRelease
Feb 15 09:20:36 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Reading package lists...
                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • M
                          mathiashedberg
                          last edited by

                          This post is deleted!
                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • BenjiReisB
                            BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                            last edited by

                            That's weird, I've just ran the recipe and everything went fine.
                            Do you have any network issues explaining the installation problem?

                            debian@master:~$ sudo systemctl status cloud-final.service
● cloud-final.service - Execute cloud user/final scripts
   Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/cloud-final.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
   Active: active (exited) since Mon 2021-02-15 09:47:38 EST; 14min ago
  Process: 558 ExecStart=/usr/bin/cloud-init modules --mode=final (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
 Main PID: 558 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • olivierlambertO
                              olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                              last edited by

                              This or not enough RAM in the VM, explaining why fork failed to create a new thread…

                              M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • M
                                mathiashedberg @olivierlambert
                                last edited by mathiashedberg

                                @olivierlambert @BenjiReis
                                Im also guessing too little RAM. The VMs were started with only 500MB, which i found strange. Any way for me to change this on initialization?

                                Im guessing i could change the Debian 9 template

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • BenjiReisB
                                  BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                  last edited by

                                  Your VM should have 2G of RAM. Base on our Debian 10 template.
                                  This is really weird.

                                  M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • M
                                    mathiashedberg @BenjiReis
                                    last edited by mathiashedberg

                                    @benjireis Mine says "Original Template Debian Stretch 9.0"

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • BenjiReisB
                                      BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                      last edited by

                                      Weird, which templates appear in your Hub view?

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • M
                                        mathiashedberg
                                        last edited by

                                        Just the standard ones:

                                        • Alpine 3.10
                                        • Centos 8.0
                                        • Debian 10
                                        • pfsense 2.4

                                        My XOA has two pools

                                        This issue is similar to the one i had earlier, where the image was being based on a different existing VM, now in this case its the debian 9 template.
                                        I know the debian 10 template works fine as this is what i normally use

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • BenjiReisB
                                          BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                          last edited by

                                          I do not understand how the wrong templates can be used by the recipe.

                                          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • M
                                            mathiashedberg @BenjiReis
                                            last edited by

                                            Yes it is quite strange.

                                            This XOA has been in use for some time with a couple of pools added and removed over time, so I may be an edge case here.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post