XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Kuberenets cluster recipe not happy

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    49 Posts 5 Posters 16.4k Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M Offline
      mathiashedberg
      last edited by

      Hi!

      I had a similar issue, however i noticed that the k8s VMs created were based on a snapshot of a different VM i had running on the system. So in turn i ended up with a bunch of clones of a completely different VM.

      This VM that the new k8s VMs were based on, was created based off the Debian 10 template. New VMs created with the debian 10 template work fine, however only the k8s recipe ends up basing the image on this existing VM.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • BenjiReisB Offline
        BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
        last edited by

        A new version has been released last week or so that solves issues in the recipe.
        Did you encounter any issue with latest xoa?

        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M Offline
          mathiashedberg @BenjiReis
          last edited by

          @benjireis
          Yes currently the issue is with version 5.54.0. Tested about an hour ago

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • BenjiReisB Offline
            BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
            last edited by

            Latest XOA is 5.55.1, can you try with this version?

            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M Offline
              mathiashedberg @BenjiReis
              last edited by mathiashedberg

              @benjireis
              Looks like that fixed that issue. Now there is an issue with the cloud-config. Seems like gnupg2 is not installed

              sudo systemctl status cloud-final.service
● cloud-final.service - Execute cloud user/final scripts
   Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/cloud-final.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
   Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Mon 2021-02-15 09:20:37 EST; 5min ago
  Process: 649 ExecStart=/usr/bin/cloud-init modules --mode=final (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)
 Main PID: 649 (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)

              Relevant snippet: I could send you the whole snippet from sudo journalctl -u cloud-final.service if you would like

              Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]: 0 added, 0 removed; done.
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Running hooks in /etc/ca-certificates/update.d...
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]: done.
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Errors were encountered while processing:
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]:  linux-image-4.19.0-14-amd64
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]:  linux-image-amd64
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]: FATAL -> Failed to fork.
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Cloud-init v. 18.3 running 'modules:final' at Mon, 15 Feb 2021 14:19:26 +0000. Up 15.00 seconds.
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]: 2021-02-15 14:20:34,984 - util.py[WARNING]: Package upgrade failed
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Reading package lists...FATAL -> Failed to fork.
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: 2021-02-15 14:20:35,124 - util.py[WARNING]: Failed to install packages: ['apt-transport-https', 'ca-certificates', 'curl', 'gnupg2', 'software-properties-common']
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: 2021-02-15 14:20:35,127 - cc_package_update_upgrade_install.py[WARNING]: 2 failed with exceptions, re-raising the last one
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: 2021-02-15 14:20:35,128 - util.py[WARNING]: Running module package-update-upgrade-install (<module 'cloudinit.config.cc_package_update_upgrade_install' from '/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cloudinit/config/cc_package_update_upgrade_in
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: 2: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: curl: not found
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 sudo[17486]:     root : TTY=unknown ; PWD=/ ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/usr/bin/apt-key add -
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 sudo[17486]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session opened for user root by (uid=0)
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: E: gnupg, gnupg2 and gnupg1 do not seem to be installed, but one of them is required for this operation
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: 3: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: curl: not found
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 sudo[17486]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session closed for user root
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 sudo[17505]:     root : TTY=unknown ; PWD=/ ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/usr/bin/apt-key add -
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 sudo[17505]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session opened for user root by (uid=0)
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: E: gnupg, gnupg2 and gnupg1 do not seem to be installed, but one of them is required for this operation
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: 4: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: add-apt-repository: not found
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: 5: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: add-apt-repository: not found
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 sudo[17505]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session closed for user root
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Hit:1 http://security.debian.org buster/updates InRelease
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Hit:2 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster InRelease
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Hit:3 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster-updates InRelease
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Hit:4 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster-backports InRelease
Feb 15 09:20:36 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Reading package lists...
              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M Offline
                mathiashedberg
                last edited by

                This post is deleted!
                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • BenjiReisB Offline
                  BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                  last edited by

                  That's weird, I've just ran the recipe and everything went fine.
                  Do you have any network issues explaining the installation problem?

                  debian@master:~$ sudo systemctl status cloud-final.service
● cloud-final.service - Execute cloud user/final scripts
   Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/cloud-final.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
   Active: active (exited) since Mon 2021-02-15 09:47:38 EST; 14min ago
  Process: 558 ExecStart=/usr/bin/cloud-init modules --mode=final (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
 Main PID: 558 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • olivierlambertO Offline
                    olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                    last edited by

                    This or not enough RAM in the VM, explaining why fork failed to create a new thread…

                    M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M Offline
                      mathiashedberg @olivierlambert
                      last edited by mathiashedberg

                      @olivierlambert @BenjiReis
                      Im also guessing too little RAM. The VMs were started with only 500MB, which i found strange. Any way for me to change this on initialization?

                      Im guessing i could change the Debian 9 template

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • BenjiReisB Offline
                        BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                        last edited by

                        Your VM should have 2G of RAM. Base on our Debian 10 template.
                        This is really weird.

                        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • M Offline
                          mathiashedberg @BenjiReis
                          last edited by mathiashedberg

                          @benjireis Mine says "Original Template Debian Stretch 9.0"

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • BenjiReisB Offline
                            BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                            last edited by

                            Weird, which templates appear in your Hub view?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • M Offline
                              mathiashedberg
                              last edited by

                              Just the standard ones:

                              • Alpine 3.10
                              • Centos 8.0
                              • Debian 10
                              • pfsense 2.4

                              My XOA has two pools

                              This issue is similar to the one i had earlier, where the image was being based on a different existing VM, now in this case its the debian 9 template.
                              I know the debian 10 template works fine as this is what i normally use

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • BenjiReisB Offline
                                BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                last edited by

                                I do not understand how the wrong templates can be used by the recipe.

                                M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • M Offline
                                  mathiashedberg @BenjiReis
                                  last edited by

                                  Yes it is quite strange.

                                  This XOA has been in use for some time with a couple of pools added and removed over time, so I may be an edge case here.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • olivierlambertO Offline
                                    olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                    last edited by

                                    Delete the template, maybe it's a previous version 🙂

                                    M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • M Offline
                                      mathiashedberg @olivierlambert
                                      last edited by

                                      @olivierlambert I deleted all templates from XOA by going to "Hub" > "Templates" and using the trash icon to remove them. However it still appears that it uses debian 9. I could try to remove all templates from the system via the windows xcp-ng client. However it may be of importance to know that i have never used the debian 9 template before. While using this recipe was the first time i saw it.

                                      I remember trying the k8s recipe about a year ago, maybe that has tainted my setup in some way?

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • olivierlambertO Offline
                                        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                        last edited by

                                        How do you check it's using Debian 9 template exactly?

                                        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • M Offline
                                          mathiashedberg @olivierlambert
                                          last edited by

                                          @olivierlambert Under the VM page "Advanced" > "Misc"

                                          P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • P Offline
                                            pnunn @mathiashedberg
                                            last edited by

                                            @mathiashedberg I've just checked the ones I built that started all of this... they are deb 9.

                                            Peter.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post