XCP-ng 7.6 RC1 available
-
I haven't seen much, but I am curious about my post earlier about xcp-emu-manager, I see emu-manager referenced in the logs and was curious if xcp-emu-manager should be referenced.
-
I did a test. Tried a storage live migrate on a vm which have one sanpshot. And cause this migrate problem. stack in 99%.
Then I delete snapshot of this vm and wait coalesce process. then tried again storage live migrate. Successfull.
I did this test on same vm. so, for now I think problem source is look like snapshot. I will do more test. -
On 7.6, right?
-
@olivierlambert Sorry, maybe not right topic for this issue but my xcp-ng is 7.5
-
Okay so it's not the right topic indeed, but I really want to know if you still have these issues on 7.6 RC
-
@olivierlambert I will try and will post result
-
Thanks a lot! It's important to test between 2x 7.6 hosts, to be sure it's still an issue and not a problem from another version in the middle
-
@olivierlambert said in XCP-ng 7.6 RC1 available:
o test between 2x 7.6 hosts, to be sure it's still an issue and n
Mine is between multiple 7.6 hosts. PV tools, no PV tools, linux, windows. It all does it.
-
@conradical vm have any snapshot what you try to migrate? is this storage live migrate or vm live migrate?
-
@rizaemet-0
No snapshots. It happens on both storage migrate and love migrate. -
Any activity in the VM or it's idle?
Are they in the same pool?
-
@olivierlambert
Same Pool. It does not seem to matter if it is idle or not. -
Interesting update: I installed the latest PV tools by enabling window update, this fixed 4 out of my 5 test VMs running windows. More testing is underway with linux PV and HVM.
-
That's maybe the reason why I can't reproduce. It's like old tools will lead to migration problems but not more recent ones
-
@olivierlambert said in XCP-ng 7.6 RC1 available:
That's maybe the reason why I can't reproduce. It's like old tools will lead to migration problems but not more recent ones
HVM also have migration problems.
-
I'm testing with PVHVM guests, I can't reproduce since I got latest tools installed
-
I don't know if this helps but I have also been doing some test on 7.5 and it looks like VMs that are using a large percentage of their memory have problems migrating.
eg Centos 7 HVM with Atlassian bitbucket java process using about 80%
From top:PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 1874 atlbitb+ 20 0 3695600 1.3g 6440 S 0.3 42.8 0:52.40 java 1891 atlbitb+ 20 0 4154320 1.1g 8124 S 1.3 36.5 6:40.68 javaLive migration stops at 99% and stays there till you cancel the migration and I have seen it go to 100% and the VM crash.
You then need to restart the toolstack on the receiving server or
/var/log/xcp-rrdd-plugins.log
fills up with these messagesxcp-rrdd-squeezed: [ warn|xen1-3|0 ||rrdd-plugins] Couldn't find cached dynamic-max value for domain 66, using 0Shut down the 2 java processes and it migrates OK.
I have also seen the same problem with migration of virtual disks between iSCSI SRs
-
@KFC-Netearth edited your post to see the top output better
-
@KFC-Netearth That's really interesting. Do you have the latest tools version installed in your VM?
edit: I'll try to use 80%+ RAM on a test VM and see if it triggers the problem
-
I have this version of the guest-tools on the VM
#rpm -aq|grep xen
xe-guest-utilities-xenstore-7.10.0-1.x86_64
