XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    RunX: tech preview

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    49 Posts 15 Posters 17.9k Views 15 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J Offline
      jmccoy555 @ronan-a
      last edited by

      @ronan-a thanks (was obviously too late for me to think about trying that!!) but no luck 😞

      [18:36 bad-XCP-ng-Host-03 ~]# xe vm-install template=Debian\ Buster\ 10 new-name-label=RunX sr-uuid=cb817299-f3ee-9d4e-dd5d-9edad6e55ed0 --minimal
      b3b5efcf-e810-57ab-5482-4dba14dda0a6
      [18:37 bad-XCP-ng-Host-03 ~]# xe vm-param-set uuid=b3b5efcf-e810-57ab-5482-4dba14dda0a6 HVM-boot-policy=""
      [18:38 bad-XCP-ng-Host-03 ~]# xe vm-param-set uuid=b3b5efcf-e810-57ab-5482-4dba14dda0a6 PV-args=""
      [18:38 bad-XCP-ng-Host-03 ~]# xe vm-param-set uuid=b3b5efcf-e810-57ab-5482-4dba14dda0a6 VCPUs-max=2
      [18:38 bad-XCP-ng-Host-03 ~]# xe vm-param-set uuid=b3b5efcf-e810-57ab-5482-4dba14dda0a6 VCPUs-at-startup=2
      [18:39 bad-XCP-ng-Host-03 ~]# xe vm-disk-remove device=0 uuid=b3b5efcf-e810-57ab-5482-4dba14dda0a6
      [18:39 bad-XCP-ng-Host-03 ~]# xe template-param-set is-a-template=true uuid=b3b5efcf-e810-57ab-5482-4dba14dda0a6
      [18:41 bad-XCP-ng-Host-03 ~]# nano /etc/runx.conf
      [18:43 bad-XCP-ng-Host-03 ~]# podman container create --name archlinux archlinux
      0f72916b8cca6c7c4aa68e6ebee467c0480e29e22ebbd6ec666d8385826f88b8
      [18:43 bad-XCP-ng-Host-03 ~]# podman start archlinux
      The server failed to handle your request, due to an internal error. The given message may give details useful for debugging the problem.
      message: xenopsd internal error: Could not find BlockDevice, File, or Nbd implementation: {"implementations":[["XenDisk",{"backend_type":"9pfs","extra":{},"params":"vdi:1e2e7b99-2ffe-4129-a468-96b57ab685de share_dir none ///root/runx-sr/2"}]]}
      archlinux6
      [18:44 bad-XCP-ng-Host-03 ~]# rpm -qa | grep xenops
      xenopsd-xc-0.150.12-1.2.xcpng8.2.x86_64
      xenopsd-cli-0.150.12-1.2.xcpng8.2.x86_64
      xenopsd-0.150.12-1.2.xcpng8.2.x86_64
      

      Not sure what I'm doing wrong now, or if I need an update??

      When I created the SR I had to give a host-uuid. I obviously used the host that I'm installing on.

      J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J Offline
        jmccoy555 @jmccoy555
        last edited by

        if this helps....

        yum install --enablerepo=epel -y qemu-dp xenopsd xenopsd-cli xenopsd-xc xcp-ng-xapi-storage runx
        Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, product-id, search-disabled-repos, subscription-manager
        
        This system is not registered with an entitlement server. You can use subscription-manager to register.
        
        Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
         * centos-ceph-nautilus: mirror.as29550.net
         * centos-nfs-ganesha28: mirrors.vinters.com
         * epel: mirror.freethought-internet.co.uk
        Excluding mirror: updates.xcp-ng.org
         * xcp-ng-base: mirrors.xcp-ng.org
        Excluding mirror: updates.xcp-ng.org
         * xcp-ng-linstor: mirrors.xcp-ng.org
        Excluding mirror: updates.xcp-ng.org
         * xcp-ng-runx: mirrors.xcp-ng.org
        Excluding mirror: updates.xcp-ng.org
         * xcp-ng-updates: mirrors.xcp-ng.org
        Package 2:qemu-dp-2.12.0-2.0.5.xcpng8.2.x86_64 already installed and latest version
        Package xenopsd-0.150.12-1.2.xcpng8.2.x86_64 already installed and latest version
        Package xenopsd-cli-0.150.12-1.2.xcpng8.2.x86_64 already installed and latest version
        Package xenopsd-xc-0.150.12-1.2.xcpng8.2.x86_64 already installed and latest version
        Package xcp-ng-xapi-storage-1.0.2-3.0.0.runx.1.xcpng8.2.x86_64 already installed and latest version
        Package runx-2021.1-1.0.0.runx.1.xcpng8.2.x86_64 already installed and latest version
        Nothing to do
        
        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • R Offline
          rjt
          last edited by

          Please, Please, Please make this document itself with bash variables when it comes to the various UUIDs:

          [XCP-ngHostX]# SRuuid=$(xe sr-list name-label="Local storage" --minimal)
          [XCP-ngHostX]# RunXdebTemplateName="My RunX Template based on Deb10"
          [XCP-ngHostX]# RUNXdebTEMPLATEuuid=$(xe vm-install template="Debian Buster 10" new-name-label="${RunXdebTemplateName}" sr-uuid=${SRuuid} --minimal)
          [XCP-ngHostX]# echo ${RUNXdebTEMPLATEuuid}
          [XCP-ngHostX]# xe vm-param-set uuid=${RUNXdebTEMPLATEuuid} HVM-boot-policy=""
          [XCP-ngHostX]# xe vm-param-set uuid=${RUNXdebTEMPLATEuuid} PV-args=""
          [XCP-ngHostX]# xe vm-param-set uuid=${RUNXdebTEMPLATEuuid} VCPUs-max=2
          [XCP-ngHostX]# xe vm-param-set uuid=${RUNXdebTEMPLATEuuid} VCPUs-at-startup=2
          [XCP-ngHostX]# xe vm-disk-remove device=0 uuid=${RUNXdebTEMPLATEuuid}
          [XCP-ngHostX]# xe template-param-set is-a-template=true uuid=${RUNXdebTEMPLATEuuid}
          [XCP-ngHostX]# xe template-list name-label="${RunXdebTemplateName}"
          [XCP-ngHostX]# xe template-list uuid=${RUNXdebTEMPLATEuuid}
          
          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • jchuaJ Offline
            jchua
            last edited by

            is this tech preview available on 8.3 alpha release?
            any idea how can i set RunX on 8.3 release?

            ronan-aR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • olivierlambertO Offline
              olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
              last edited by

              Question for @stormi and/or @ronan-a

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ronan-aR Offline
                ronan-a Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @jchua
                last edited by

                @jchua We currently don't have a test version planned for XCP-ng 8.3. Only 8.2 is supported for the moment.

                FinallfF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • FinallfF Offline
                  Finallf @ronan-a
                  last edited by

                  @ronan-a would it be too much to ask for a version for 8.3?
                  I'm testing the alpha since publication and I would like to be able to use RunX 😄

                  ronan-aR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • ronan-aR Offline
                    ronan-a Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Finallf
                    last edited by

                    @Finallf It's been a while since we've been actively working on this subject, that doesn't mean that this project is abandoned, but it's not our priority target.
                    Currently it is rather this project that we are trying to move forward: https://xen-orchestra.com/blog/announcing-project-pyrgos/

                    Sorry but it's not so soon that we will have a new runx update. 😅

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • olivierlambertO Offline
                      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                      last edited by

                      Yes, and it's not impossible that RunX will be used in Pyrgos at some point 🙂

                      R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • R Offline
                        ricardogaspar2 @olivierlambert
                        last edited by

                        @olivierlambert Is there any updates on the RunX and Pygros ?
                        Any tutorials one can find? Docs or other forum threads?
                        I'm currently running XCP-NG 8.3 beta for my homelab. I'm interested in having kubernetes or Docker runtime using RunX or Pygros.

                        Thanks in advance

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • olivierlambertO Offline
                          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                          last edited by

                          Pyrgos is working, you can already use it directly from your XOA. We are now working on doing lifecycle improvements (like updating a cluster) as a next feature for Q1.

                          RunX is a bit different, it's still a test thing, for now we consider Pyrgos more important (delivering a k8s cluster in a turnkey fashion).

                          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • M Offline
                            mavoff @olivierlambert
                            last edited by

                            just a personal opinion I'm leaving here, no follow-up needed.

                            If I want to run containers I use OKD.
                            I've always seen all the comments about keeping the dom0 controller to a minimum, docker alone adds a 2GB overhead to it, no more problems in adding stuff to it.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post