XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    unhealthy VDI chain

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    21 Posts 3 Posters 2.4k Views 2 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Tristis OrisT Offline
      Tristis Oris Top contributor @olivierlambert
      last edited by

      @olivierlambert looks like XO got a bad cache with that storage.

      on same physical storage i have 2 shares connected to pool. All vm is usualy at 1st.
      So i moved broken VDI to 2nd, made few backups, everything works fine. Then moved VDI back to 1st, got this error again.
      a0363d40-4dfd-40d5-b744-b7b0f5822de4-изображение.png

      Any options how to fix that without migrating all VMs and removing this storage?

      Tristis OrisT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Tristis OrisT Offline
        Tristis Oris Top contributor @Tristis Oris
        last edited by

        problem still exist even for new VMs.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • olivierlambertO Offline
          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
          last edited by

          You need to understand why it doesn't coalesce 🙂 /var/log/SMlog is your friend.

          Tristis OrisT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Tristis OrisT Offline
            Tristis Oris Top contributor @olivierlambert
            last edited by

            @olivierlambert nothing about failed VMs at SMlog for this period.
            backup task started at 1:00. since 1:03 to 1:06 few backups was failed. log looks like

            Jun 14 01:00:35 name SM: [17853]   pread SUCCESS
            Jun 14 01:00:35 name SM: [17853] lock: released /var/lock/sm/.nil/lvm
            Jun 14 01:00:35 name SM: [17853] lock: acquired /var/lock/sm/.nil/lvm
            Jun 14 01:00:36 name SM: [17853] lock: released /var/lock/sm/.nil/lvm
            Jun 14 01:00:36 name SM: [17853] Calling tap unpause with minor 8
            Jun 14 01:00:36 name SM: [17853] ['/usr/sbin/tap-ctl', 'unpause', '-p', '28995', '-m', '8', '-a', 'vhd:/dev/VG_XenStorage-f1a514f3-2ef9-5705-7a7e-c8c23483122c/V
            HD-236b3cc3-80f7-40ff-9862-f8d4c2f69225']
            Jun 14 01:00:36 name SM: [17853]  = 0
            Jun 14 01:00:36 name SM: [17853] lock: released /var/lock/sm/236b3cc3-80f7-40ff-9862-f8d4c2f69225/vdi
            Jun 14 01:06:02 name SM: [19600] on-slave.multi: {'vgName': 'VG_XenStorage-f1a514f3-2ef9-5705-7a7e-c8c23483122c', 'lvName1': 'VHD-1fa9eb66-49fe-4e93-b64d-fbb2c3
            bb8745', 'action1': 'deactivateNoRefcount', 'action2': 'cleanupLockAndRefcount', 'uuid2': '1fa9eb66-49fe-4e93-b64d-fbb2c3bb8745', 'ns2': 'lvm-f1a514f3-2ef9-5705-7a7e-c8c2
            3483122c'}
            Jun 14 01:06:02 name SM: [19600] LVMCache created for VG_XenStorage-f1a514f3-2ef9-5705-7a7e-c8c23483122c
            Jun 14 01:06:02 name SM: [19600] on-slave.action 1: deactivateNoRefcount
            Jun 14 01:06:02 name SM: [19600] LVMCache: will initialize now
            Jun 14 01:06:02 name SM: [19600] LVMCache: refreshing
            Jun 14 01:06:02 name SM: [19600] lock: opening lock file /var/lock/sm/.nil/lvm
            Jun 14 01:06:02 name SM: [19600] lock: acquired /var/lock/sm/.nil/lvm
            Jun 14 01:06:02 name SM: [19600] ['/sbin/lvs', '--noheadings', '--units', 'b', '-o', '+lv_tags', '/dev/VG_XenStorage-f1a514f3-2ef9-5705-7a7e-c8c23483122c']
            Jun 14 01:06:03 name SM: [19600]   pread SUCCESS
            
            

            no any info for 6 min. 31325bcd-1e1c-4fec-9058-961772a13141-изображение.png

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • olivierlambertO Offline
              olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
              last edited by

              This XO message is not a failure. It's a protection.

              Your problem isn't in XO but in your storage that either doesn't coalesce (at all) or coalesce slower than you create new snapshots (ie when a new backup starts).

              So you have to check on storage side if you have coalesce issues.

              Tristis OrisT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Tristis OrisT Offline
                Tristis Oris Top contributor @olivierlambert
                last edited by

                @olivierlambert but backup works fine on another share at same storage. I think it easier to recreate this one.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • olivierlambertO Offline
                  olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                  last edited by

                  In your XO, SR detailed view, Advanced, you should see the disks to coalesce.

                  If you backup a VM having a disk not coalesced yet, XO will prevent the creation of a new snapshot.

                  You can disable all jobs and see if you end with zero VDI to coalesce. If it works, then it means some disks are backup faster than your SR can coalesce.

                  Tristis OrisT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Tristis OrisT Offline
                    Tristis Oris Top contributor @olivierlambert
                    last edited by

                    @olivierlambert thanks, i will try.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Tristis OrisT Offline
                      Tristis Oris Top contributor
                      last edited by

                      solved problem.
                      Storage was in weird state, can't dismount it from pool with bunch on unknown errors. Need a pool reboot to detach it. After reattach it works normally.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • olivierlambertO Offline
                        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                        last edited by

                        Good news then 🙂

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post