New Rust Xen guest tools

Sam

@olivierlambert also if you use hostname with

hostname: {name}%

The hostname of the vm would end in 0

kevdog

When using this toolset, what network interface names does this match against? For example it will match against interface names starting with eth and I think enpS. I looked in the source code within the main branch but couldn't find the file where this search occurs.

yann

@kevdog on Linux it really does not care about the interface name, it checks if it is a VIF (see src/vif_detect_linux.rs). On FreeBSD it does filter on the interface name (xn*).

kevdog

So I managed to build with Cargo on arch (which also required clang as a dependency). Moved xen-guest-agent/target/debug/xen-guest-agent to /usr/sbin and also copied the basic xen-guest-agent/startup/xen-guest-agent.service file to /etc/systemd/system and enable/started the service.

And ahh -- success --
Screenshot 2024-09-09 at 9.29.58 AM.png

I guess my project for week is to figure out how to write a PKGBUILD file for this particular project. We'll see how that goes

I'm assuming since building from git repository (https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen-guest-agent) there aren't going to be any file signatures to check against. I'm looking at cargo, clang, python-setuptools and xen as dependencies?

yann

@kevdog great news, looking forward for this PKGBUILD!
Wouldn't it make sense to build from release packages rather than from Git?

The CI scripts should give you some guidance. For dependencies you should have a list at https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen-guest-agent#build-requirements. Not sure why you would want python-setuptools?

john.c

@yann said in New Rust Xen guest tools:

@kevdog great news, looking forward for this PKGBUILD!
Wouldn't it make sense to build from release packages rather than from Git?

The CI scripts should give you some guidance. For dependencies you should have a list at https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen-guest-agent#build-requirements. Not sure why you would want python-setuptools?

The Arch Linux distribution is a rolling release! The release packages appear to be for stable non-rolling release based software distributions.

So if kevdog were to create the PKGBUILD based on release packages, then how well will they handle the rolling release Arch Linux?

yann

@john-c a rolling-release distro does not have to follow every commit of each software component, that would be a bit extreme They are rather about providing users with latest component releases as they are published.

mhomoky

@olivierlambert / @Sam According to the Gitlab docs the project URI needs to be in URL encoded format, resulting in a working line as below in my own cloud-init:

      deb [trusted=yes] https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/xen-project\%252Fxen-guest-agent/packages/generic/deb-amd64/ release/

I found this through experimentation, but weirdly it seems to be a double-URL encoded string at that point in the URI for Gitlab… go figure.

I have another escape related question though. I'm not sure if it's your YAML parser or my editor but if I attempt to use the % as found in the beginning of the documentation example, neovim no longer recognises the file as YAML. So this:

#cloud-config
hostname: {name}
fqdn: {name}%.my-domain.com

from line 3 onwards doesn't work correctly, despite being valid YAML 1.2.2.

Again to get this working, I had to surround the value with single quotes:

#cloud-config
hostname: '{name}%'
fqdn: '{name}%.my-domain.com'

Which library / version of YAML are you targeting?

Also, is the UUID or mac address of a VM exposed to the cloud-init parser internally (or is there a list somewhere of other variables like {name} that are?).

Thanks for a great product and I hope this helps someone

olivierlambert

Hi @mhomoky I think it's unrelated to the topic, that would be better to create a new thread I think.

Sam

@mhomoky Thanks, worked perfectly fine.

deb [trusted=yes] https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/xen-project\%252Fxen-guest-agent/packages/generic/deb-amd64/ release/

No issues in Cloud-config

Also for hostname, I just used {name}without any %

The only thing missing is being able to reapply cloud-init configs or easy reconfigure from the Ui. But that's for another topic.