XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    After installing updates: 0 bytes free, Control domain memory = 0B

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved XCP-ng
    92 Posts 7 Posters 28.8k Views 5 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • olivierlambertO Offline
      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
      last edited by

      Can you md5sum xen-4.17.3-4.gz

      From the mirror & RPM, I have f011721be0c7b57563e29ed282558da3

      D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • olivierlambertO Offline
        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
        last edited by

        Adding @yann in the loop in case I'm missing something obvious

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • yannY Offline
          yann Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Dataslak
          last edited by

          @Dataslak what does lsblk -o name,mountpoint,label,size,uuid show?

          D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D Offline
            Dataslak @olivierlambert
            last edited by

            @olivierlambert
            c08e011f-a210-471f-87c9-ed421595dac5-image.png

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D Offline
              Dataslak @yann
              last edited by

              @yann
              Hello Yann, thank you for pitching in.
              7c30db11-59d4-4898-a19b-83a933e8f9ee-image.png

              yannY 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • yannY Offline
                yann Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Dataslak
                last edited by

                @Dataslak can you please request a commandline from GRUB (hit c on the boot menu), and issue the following commands:

                echo $root
                search --label --set root root-eqjpzg
                echo $root
                
                D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • olivierlambertO Offline
                  olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                  last edited by olivierlambert

                  Also a cat /proc/mdstat in the Dom0 would help.

                  D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D Offline
                    Dataslak @yann
                    last edited by Dataslak

                    @yann
                    edbc1bca-dc7d-409a-85f4-9080ab4993df-image.png

                    Info: I am mirroring two M.2 SSDs ! Software RAID established by the installation routine of v8.3.
                    Could the mirror be broken and cause this somehow?

                    yannY 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • D Offline
                      Dataslak @olivierlambert
                      last edited by Dataslak

                      @olivierlambert said in After installing updates: 0 bytes free, Control domain memory = 0B:

                      Also a cat /proc/mdstat in the Dom0 would help.

                      Please forgive my ignorance: How do I execute this command in Dom0 ?

                      I've read https://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Dom0 and it helped a little. Do I run the command in the console within XOA?

                      olivierlambertO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • yannY Offline
                        yann Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Dataslak
                        last edited by

                        @Dataslak so it is choosing to "boot from the 1st disk of the raid1", we could try to tell him to boot from the 2nd one:

                        • on the grub menu hit e to edit the boot commands
                        • replace that search ... line with set root=hd1,gpt1
                        • then hit Ctrl-x to boot
                        D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • olivierlambertO Offline
                          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO @Dataslak
                          last edited by

                          @Dataslak Dom0 is "the host" (if you think it's the host it's not really but anyway), ie the machine you are connected to and showing results since the start 🙂

                          D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • D Offline
                            Dataslak @yann
                            last edited by Dataslak

                            @yann
                            Wohoo!!
                            All VMs came up!
                            Host is not in maintenance mode.
                            Control domain memory = 12GiB
                            Stats are back
                            Etc....

                            813787ec-7c49-41e1-8a59-af2fda8648bc-image.png

                            1867f534-16d5-4da6-8418-17d61d664857-image.png

                            As far as I can see (which is limited) everything looks good?

                            How can I see the status of the RAID1 and see if the mirror is intact ?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • D Offline
                              Dataslak @olivierlambert
                              last edited by Dataslak

                              @olivierlambert
                              Thank you for explaining to me. I will look more into details when (if) I find time 😄

                              fcb72f47-cdc2-46a6-b84e-b532b9089d14-image.png

                              Ah - I see you were ahead of me !

                              How can I interpret this? Raid1 OK? Synched? Ready to deal with a single drive failure?

                              How will XO inform me if one of the drives fails? Will I have to scour through logs, or will there be a clear visible notice in the interface?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • olivierlambertO Offline
                                olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                last edited by olivierlambert

                                That's the problem. Your RAID1 lost the sync. And so it continued to boot on the disk out of sync, loading the old Xen from the boot while the rest (root partition) was up to date.

                                D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • D Offline
                                  Dataslak @olivierlambert
                                  last edited by Dataslak

                                  @olivierlambert
                                  Since this happened on six servers simultaneously when applying updates through XO I guess we may have found an error ?

                                  If so then all of this was not in vain, and I can be happy to have made a tiny tiny contribution to the development of 8.3 ?

                                  Will the modification of the Grub boot loader be safe to apply to all remaining 5 servers? Or should I do some verification on each before applying it?

                                  Is the modification of Grub what I will have to do if a drive fails? Change that one line from set root=hd1,gpt1 to set root=hd0,gpt1 or something?

                                  stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • olivierlambertO Offline
                                    olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                    last edited by olivierlambert

                                    I don't know yet, but you lost one drive. Can you run xe host-call-plugin host-uuid=<uuid> plugin=raid.py fn=check_raid_pool? (replace with the UUID of the host)

                                    edit: check that on all your other hosts

                                    D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • D Offline
                                      Dataslak @olivierlambert
                                      last edited by

                                      @olivierlambert

                                      XCP-ng-002:
                                      This runs 8.2.1 with only one drive. I was planning on upgrading it to 8.3 and insert another drive to obtain redundancy when time was available:
                                      41e6be9f-d97e-49fb-a95f-b4fc6e2ab6ac-image.png

                                      XCP-ng-003:
                                      d8b36828-abda-45a3-916e-65a916546ed8-image.png

                                      XCP-ng-004:
                                      ab3aa27c-bfd3-4a62-b8c2-d16f4d409b0e-image.png

                                      XCP-ng-005:
                                      62787efd-5397-4d7d-9f70-9c4f36ed1db1-image.png

                                      XCP-ng-006:
                                      8f3ac816-8bda-4ad8-9e4d-3b9fd6f99a90-image.png

                                      XCP-ng-008:
                                      This server is clean installed after the problems
                                      3bbaf4cb-d89f-4825-9888-3e8a37ec15ac-image.png

                                      Can your trained eyes see anything I should be aware of?

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • olivierlambertO Offline
                                        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                        last edited by olivierlambert

                                        I can immediately see the hosts with the State: "clean, degraded" on XCP-ng 005. The rest is in the state "active", which is OK.

                                        So you don't have a similar issue on your other hosts, it's only with this one, you have a dead disk (not syncing since a while). Try to check the dead disk and if you can, force a RAID1 sync on it.

                                        D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • D Offline
                                          Dataslak @olivierlambert
                                          last edited by Dataslak

                                          @olivierlambert
                                          XCP-ng-005 is the only 8.3 host I have restarted so far. All the hosts showing "3" in the triangle is asking for a reboot and claims hardware does not support virtualization.
                                          65573855-a436-4552-b4b5-9e3614955c57-image.png
                                          2351705a-75a9-459b-9073-de0c52871481-image.png

                                          Shall I try to reboot one of them and see if the RAID1 breaks like it did on XCP-ng-005?

                                          If you plan on going home for the week-end soon then we can delay this until monday? I hope the power does not fail in the meantime (it very very rarely does; it is very reliable where I am).
                                          I do not wish to keep you at work. But if you - like me - plan to remain at work then I am very happy to keep going.

                                          Please forgive my rudeness:
                                          THANK YOU for solving the problem so far! The 900+ USD I invested 3/4 year ago was money well spent. Not only is your product amazing. Your skill and availability is also great!

                                          yannY 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • yannY Offline
                                            yann Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Dataslak
                                            last edited by

                                            @Dataslak if you only launched the upgrade and did not reboot yet, that alert is normal. Now if you did reboot them already, there is likely a problem.

                                            One idea crossed my mind: when you upgraded to 8.3, in the list of products found on your disks, were you properly proposed to upgrade a RAID install, on all those hosts?

                                            D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post