As a consequence 7.6 will EOL pretty soon.
How does that impact XCP?

Thx

@stormi said in Status of XCP-ng 7.6: beta out soon:

Not all the basic features. Some of them, but important ones.

By the look of XSO-878, it seems that VM lifecycle is going to be "locked" away for GPU bound VM?
I mean regular server headless VMs can carry on with your closed source or even vGPU VM could?
I can see XCP-ng doing nicely for server like VMs and Citrix focusing on licenced products for GPU VMs....
I'm not sure I read this intent well, so I'd gladly welcome any insight from NG team (if not too time consuming) or anybody else.

Thx

Would it be "stupid" to use the hash of the user's (asking for the export) password to encrypt "by default" the export?

Hi sorry to revive this a bit.
First, I want to say that this is good news, and your team keep doing clever moves in positioning and alliances.
Second, what about HA-Lizard? They have been working on that angle too, and for a while now. I've been considering them a lot but never jumped.
Will there be synergy between you guys or will we have to make a choice as end-users?
Thx for any insight.

Congratulations! This is great news for you fan base!

As a consequence 7.6 will EOL pretty soon.
How does that impact XCP?

Thx

@olivierlambert was afraid so. Thx for taking the time to clarify.
Don't you feel this is a blocker for ng's future and might call for the community to try and help in some way?

@stormi said in Status of XCP-ng 7.6: beta out soon:

Not all the basic features. Some of them, but important ones.

By the look of XSO-878, it seems that VM lifecycle is going to be "locked" away for GPU bound VM?
I mean regular server headless VMs can carry on with your closed source or even vGPU VM could?
I can see XCP-ng doing nicely for server like VMs and Citrix focusing on licenced products for GPU VMs....
I'm not sure I read this intent well, so I'd gladly welcome any insight from NG team (if not too time consuming) or anybody else.

Thx