XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. topsecret
    T
    Offline
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 2
    • Posts 5
    • Groups 0

    topsecret

    @topsecret

    0
    Reputation
    5
    Profile views
    5
    Posts
    0
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined
    Last Online

    topsecret Unfollow Follow

    Latest posts made by topsecret

    • RE: VM time sync with Dom0

      @olivierlambert any other suggestions? time sync with guest tools for example?
      Our client can't use Internet access at all.

      posted in Compute
      T
      topsecret
    • VM time sync with Dom0

      Hello.
      How to sync time with xcp-ng host? My VM doesn't have Internet access and NTP sync can't work in this case.

      posted in Compute
      T
      topsecret
    • RE: leaf-coalesce: EXCEPTION. " Unexpected bump in size"

      I powered off one VM with two 2Tb disks, overall coalesce time was about 3-4 hours.

      Running VM still has VDI to coalesce. I found proccess "/usr/bin/vhd-util coalesce --debug -n /dev/VG_XenStorage-de024eb7-ce14-5487-e229-7ca321b103a2/VHD-b5d6ab41-50dc-4116-a23c-e453b93ce161"
      Can I run it again to parallel coalesce process?

      posted in Compute
      T
      topsecret
    • RE: leaf-coalesce: EXCEPTION. " Unexpected bump in size"

      @ronan-a This cluster based on Huawei CH121 V5 servers with Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 5120T CPU @ 2.20GHz, 320 Gb RAM and Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6138T CPU @ 2.00GHz, 512 Gb RAM. We have more than a half free RAM and CPU on each server according to Xen Orchestra. SAS storage free capacity is about 45% (17Tb).
      Problem disks capacity are about 2Tb
      We can't stop virtual machines, it affects productive service

      posted in Compute
      T
      topsecret
    • leaf-coalesce: EXCEPTION. " Unexpected bump in size"

      I use xcp-ng 8.2.0 and I have several unhealthy VDIs after removimg snapshots.
      In /var/log/SMlog I see the next:

      Aug 161 14:23:04 xcp-sr121-u0112-s1 SM: [13443] lock: released /var/lock/sm/lvm-e8b61db5-e776-9b83-c051-01823799be22/91026479-cc7d-4ed2-9062-1a53e54c748c
      Aug 16 14:23:04 xcp-sr121-u0112-s1 SM: [13443] ['/usr/bin/vhd-util', 'query', '--debug', '-s', '-n', '/dev/VG_XenStorage-e8b61db5-e776-9b83-c051-01823799be22/VHD-91026479-cc7d-4ed2-9062-1a53e54c748c']
      Aug 16 14:23:04 xcp-sr121-u0112-s1 SM: [13443] pread SUCCESS
      Aug 16 14:23:04 xcp-sr121-u0112-s1 SMGC: [13443] No progress, attempt: 3
      Aug 16 14:23:04 xcp-sr121-u0112-s1 SMGC: [13443] Aborted coalesce
      Aug 16 14:23:04 xcp-sr121-u0112-s1 SMGC: [13443] Iteration: 1 -- Initial size 50564555264 --> Final size 42630242816
      Aug 16 14:23:04 xcp-sr121-u0112-s1 SMGC: [13443] Iteration: 2 -- Initial size 42630242816 --> Final size 46032163328
      Aug 16 14:23:04 xcp-sr121-u0112-s1 SMGC: [13443] Iteration: 3 -- Initial size 46032163328 --> Final size 47671136768
      Aug 16 14:23:04 xcp-sr121-u0112-s1 SMGC: [13443] Iteration: 4 -- Initial size 47671136768 --> Final size 53155394048
      Aug 16 14:23:04 xcp-sr121-u0112-s1 SMGC: [13443] Unexpected bump in size, compared to minimum acheived
      Aug 16 14:23:04 xcp-sr121-u0112-s1 SMGC: [13443] Starting size was 50564555264
      Aug 16 14:23:04 xcp-sr121-u0112-s1 SMGC: [13443] Final size was 53155394048
      Aug 16 14:23:04 xcp-sr121-u0112-s1 SMGC: [13443] Minimum size acheived was 42630242816
      Aug 16 14:23:04 xcp-sr121-u0112-s1 SMGC: [13443] Removed leaf-coalesce from 91026479VHD
      Aug 16 14:23:04 xcp-sr121-u0112-s1 SMGC: [13443] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*
      Aug 16 14:23:04 xcp-sr121-u0112-s1 SMGC: [13443] ***********************
      Aug 16 14:23:04 xcp-sr121-u0112-s1 SMGC: [13443] * E X C E P T I O N *
      Aug 16 14:23:04 xcp-sr121-u0112-s1 SMGC: [13443] ***********************
      Aug 16 14:23:04 xcp-sr121-u0112-s1 SMGC: [13443] leaf-coalesce: EXCEPTION <class 'util.SMException'>, VDI 91026479-cc7d-4ed2-9062-1a53e54c748c could not be coalesced
      Aug 16 14:23:04 xcp-sr121-u0112-s1 SMGC: [13443] File "/opt/xensource/sm/cleanup.py", line 1774, in coalesceLeaf
      Aug 16 14:23:04 xcp-sr121-u0112-s1 SMGC: [13443] self._coalesceLeaf(vdi)
      Aug 16 14:23:04 xcp-sr121-u0112-s1 SMGC: [13443] File "/opt/xensource/sm/cleanup.py", line 2049, in _coalesceLeaf
      Aug 16 14:23:04 xcp-sr121-u0112-s1 SMGC: [13443] .format(uuid=vdi.uuid))
      Aug 16 14:23:04 xcp-sr121-u0112-s1 SMGC: [13443]
      Aug 16 14:23:04 xcp-sr121-u0112-s1 SMGC: [13443] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*
      Aug 16 14:23:04 xcp-sr121-u0112-s1 SMGC: [13443] Leaf-coalesce failed on 91026479VHD, skipping

      I changed in /opt/xensource/sm/cleanup.py:
      LIVE_LEAF_COALESCE_MAX_SIZE from "20 * 1024 * 1024 " up to "16384 * 1024 * 1024 "
      LIVE_LEAF_COALESCE_TIMEOUT from 10 to 400
      MAX_ITERATIONS_NO_PROGRESS from 3 to 6
      MAX_ITERATIONS from 10 to 20

      And I still can't get rid of "VDIs to coalesce"
      Thanks!
      2fb03539-9e0b-4a7c-8a59-0734ae22f740-image.png

      posted in Compute
      T
      topsecret