XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    324 Posts 36 Posters 116.1k Views 53 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D Offline
      dinhngtu Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @ovicz
      last edited by

      @ovicz No UEFI mapping displayed in the shell suggests that the VM couldn't detect its disks. Is your SR doing OK?

      O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • O Offline
        ovicz @dinhngtu
        last edited by ovicz

        @dinhngtu [11:31 xcp-ng-akz ~]# zpool status
        pool: ZFS_Pool
        state: ONLINE
        config:

        NAME        STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
        ZFS_Pool    ONLINE       0     0     0
          sda       ONLINE       0     0     0
        

        errors: No known data errors

        I guess so...

        Screenshot from 2025-12-17 11-34-47.png

        D ronan-aR 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D Offline
          dinhngtu Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @ovicz
          last edited by

          @ovicz How is your SR connected to the host, via NFS or something else?

          O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • O Offline
            ovicz @dinhngtu
            last edited by ovicz

            @dinhngtu No. It's a local SSD mounted with the zfs pool. Everything worked before the update. I don't see other errors in the host.

            D 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D Offline
              dinhngtu Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @ovicz
              last edited by

              @ovicz Let me call @storage

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D Offline
                dinhngtu Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @ovicz
                last edited by

                @ovicz To confirm, you were using the ZFS integration documented here https://docs.xcp-ng.org/storage/#zfs right?

                O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • O Offline
                  ovicz @dinhngtu
                  last edited by ovicz

                  @dinhngtu Yes. Like I said, all was good before the update from testing. The host xcp-ng is on another drive and the zfs pool is on other ssd if that matters. The host is using ext4 partitions.

                  lsblk
                  NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
                  nvme0n1 259:0 0 238.5G 0 disk
                  ├─nvme0n1p5 259:4 0 4G 0 part /var/log
                  ├─nvme0n1p3 259:3 0 512M 0 part /boot/efi
                  ├─nvme0n1p1 259:1 0 18G 0 part /
                  ├─nvme0n1p6 259:5 0 1G 0 part [SWAP]
                  └─nvme0n1p2 259:2 0 18G 0 part
                  sda 8:0 0 465.8G 0 disk
                  ├─sda9 8:9 0 8M 0 part
                  └─sda1 8:1 0 465.8G 0 part

                  D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D Offline
                    dinhngtu Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @ovicz
                    last edited by

                    @ovicz I'd start by listing the VDIs on your SR to see if things are still there.

                    O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • O Offline
                      ovicz @dinhngtu
                      last edited by ovicz

                      @dinhngtu xe sr-list
                      uuid ( RO) : 5956893e-7041-d424-a35e-6e7449238663
                      name-label ( RW): LocalISO
                      name-description ( RW):
                      host ( RO): xcp-ng-akz
                      type ( RO): iso
                      content-type ( RO): iso

                      uuid ( RO) : dccbfe9d-3e28-2163-2ea9-b0e972a42804
                      name-label ( RW): DVD drives
                      name-description ( RW): Physical DVD drives
                      host ( RO): xcp-ng-akz
                      type ( RO): udev
                      content-type ( RO): iso

                      uuid ( RO) : 8e908932-0577-d6f0-3133-14d94a317b90
                      name-label ( RW): LocalZFS
                      name-description ( RW):
                      host ( RO): xcp-ng-akz
                      type ( RO): zfs
                      content-type ( RO): user

                      uuid ( RO) : b37d8ad6-d9fa-203b-b057-a834908ae0e7
                      name-label ( RW): Removable storage
                      name-description ( RW):
                      host ( RO): xcp-ng-akz
                      type ( RO): udev
                      content-type ( RO): disk

                      uuid ( RO) : 34133934-0724-f9c1-3831-79cf54445fae
                      name-label ( RW): XCP-ng Tools
                      name-description ( RW): XCP-ng Tools ISOs
                      host ( RO): xcp-ng-akz
                      type ( RO): iso
                      content-type ( RO): iso!

                      Screenshot from 2025-12-17 11-42-47.png

                      D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • D Offline
                        dinhngtu Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @ovicz
                        last edited by

                        @ovicz How about xe vdi-list sr-uuid=8e908932-0577-d6f0-3133-14d94a317b90 ?

                        O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • O Offline
                          ovicz @dinhngtu
                          last edited by

                          @dinhngtu no ouput from that command.

                          D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • D Offline
                            dinhngtu Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @ovicz
                            last edited by

                            @ovicz Ok, I've contacted the storage team for a look.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • ronan-aR Offline
                              ronan-a Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @ovicz
                              last edited by

                              @ovicz Can you share the /var/log/SMlog file from the master? It's quite strange considering that this driver is small and hasn't been modified.

                              O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stormiS Offline
                                stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                last edited by

                                @ovicz I'd also like to have a look at /var/log/daemon.log after a failed VM startup attempt.

                                O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • A Online
                                  acebmxer
                                  last edited by acebmxer

                                  i have applied updates to my 2 amd home lab hosts. Ryzen 7700x and 7950x amd x670e mobo's. No issues to report. Windows vm migrated between hosts no isssues. No issues with windows vm booting with uefi enabled prior to update.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • O Offline
                                    ovicz @ronan-a
                                    last edited by

                                    @ronan-a SMlog.txt
                                    Attached. Please rename it as tgz and extract it as I couldn't uploaded as an archive file.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • O Offline
                                      ovicz @stormi
                                      last edited by ovicz

                                      @stormi daemon.txt

                                      Attached. Please rename it as tgz and extract it as I couldn't uploaded as an archive file.

                                      Screenshot from 2025-12-17 14-04-50.png

                                      Strange thing the disks don't appear in xen orchestra but they are on the drive:

                                      [14:04 xcp-ng-akz zfs]# ls -l
                                      total 34863861
                                      -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 393216 Dec 10 11:19 2b94bb8f-b44d-4c3d-9844-0b2c80e7d11c.qcow2
                                      -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 16969367552 Dec 17 09:15 37c89d4e-93d0-4f47-a340-4add9fb91307.qcow2
                                      -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5435228160 Dec 16 18:41 67d7cb86-864b-4bfc-9ec6-f54dbb9c9f45.qcow2
                                      -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10212737024 Dec 17 09:37 740d3e10-ebc9-42a3-bc7c-849f6bcc0e61.qcow2
                                      -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2685730816 Dec 16 14:52 76dc4b94-ad88-4514-87ef-99357b93daaf.qcow2
                                      -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 197408 Dec 10 11:19 8158436c-327a-4dcf-ba49-56e73006ed66.qcow2
                                      -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 11897602048 Dec 17 10:09 e219112b-73b7-46a4-8fcb-4ee8810b3625.qcow2
                                      -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 11566120960 Dec 10 09:51 f5d157cb-39df-482b-a39d-432a90d60e89.qcow2
                                      -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1984 Dec 10 11:02 filelog.txt

                                      [14:07 xcp-ng-akz zfs]# zfs list
                                      NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
                                      ZFS_Pool 33.3G 416G 33.2G /mnt/zfs
                                      [14:07 xcp-ng-akz zfs]# zpool list
                                      NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CKPOINT EXPANDSZ FRAG CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT
                                      ZFS_Pool 464G 33.3G 431G - - 5% 7% 1.00x ONLINE -
                                      [14:07 xcp-ng-akz zfs]# zpool status
                                      pool: ZFS_Pool
                                      state: ONLINE
                                      config:

                                      NAME        STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
                                      ZFS_Pool    ONLINE       0     0     0
                                        sda       ONLINE       0     0     0
                                      

                                      errors: No known data errors

                                      dthenotD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • dthenotD Online
                                        dthenot Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @ovicz
                                        last edited by dthenot

                                        @ovicz Hello,

                                        From what I saw in your logs, you have a non QCOW2 sm version, it made the QCOW2 VDIs not available to the storage stack and the XAPI lost them.
                                        If you update again while enabling the QCOW2 repo:

                                        yum update --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates,xcp-ng-qcow2
                                        

                                        A SR scan will make the VDI available to the XAPI. Though you will have to identify them and connect them to the VM manually, since this information was lost.

                                        O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                        • stormiS Offline
                                          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                          last edited by

                                          I added a warning to my initial announcement.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • O Offline
                                            ovicz @dthenot
                                            last edited by

                                            @dthenot Screenshot from 2025-12-17 14-21-43.png

                                            They appear now. I will try to identify them manually. Thanks for the tip.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post