XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Execute pre-freeze and post-thaw

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
    18 Posts 7 Posters 212 Views 6 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • olivierlambertO Offline
      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
      last edited by

      Tools are aware of a snapshot so you don't have blocks in flight.

      D TeddyAstieT 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D Offline
        dcskinner @olivierlambert
        last edited by

        @olivierlambert So there is information coming from outside into the VM 🙂

        Is there a particular reason not to implement freeze/thaw scripts in that case? The tools know there is a snap taking place and you said that you can write info from VM to outside, which would have to happen to tell the system that blocks have been committed and is ok to start. Seems like the communication is there, just need to implement the scripts.

        Coming from VMware land, this is expected behavior of the guest tools.

        I agree with OP, the webhooks looks janky, does not appear to be in the main docs, and the linked docs says it is unstable after 3 years.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • olivierlambertO Offline
          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
          last edited by

          No, it's not using the same mechanism. It's a PV call (if I remember, but I'm not sure). You cannot write a xenstore key in live to a VM (only on boot).

          D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • olivierlambertO Offline
            olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
            last edited by

            And beyond that, I'm not sure we actually want this behaviour from a security perspective. But it's another topic.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D Offline
              dcskinner @olivierlambert
              last edited by

              @olivierlambert ok, but it wouldn't have to. The guest tools always run the scripts (if they exist) when it sees a snap happening and then reports out the status the same way it says that the block commits are complete.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • olivierlambertO Offline
                olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                last edited by

                They aren't meant for that, I have no idea how difficult it would be to make the PV drivers to actually "do something" (what exactly? write a value in the xenstore?). Maybe @teddyastie could provide an opinion on that.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • TeddyAstieT Offline
                  TeddyAstie Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team Xen Guru @olivierlambert
                  last edited by TeddyAstie

                  @dcskinner @olivierlambert

                  You can read key/values from the xenstore, and write some (from VM to outside), but you cannot write values "in live" from outside the VM to the inside.

                  It is, but XAPI doesn't provide a interface for it.

                  do the guest tools quiesce the filesystems before snapshotting?

                  Tools are aware of a snapshot so you don't have blocks in flight.

                  do the guest tools quiesce the filesystems before snapshotting?

                  Guests kernel are aware, as it is them that are performing a "suspend" on toolstack request (thus quiece filesystems); although "tools" can only observe that the system has been suspended after the fact by measuring side effects, and not orchestrate it.

                  It's because suspend/resume operation doesn't come from "guest tools" actually, but instead from the kernel drivers. So userland tools has no say on it.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • D Offline
                    dinhngtu Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                    last edited by dinhngtu

                    There used to be quiescent snapshot capabilities in older versions (mainly for Windows VSS support), but it has since been removed. I'd say @Team-XAPI-Network knows more about the reason.

                    psafontP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • psafontP Offline
                      psafont Vates 🪐 XAPI & Network Team @dinhngtu
                      last edited by

                      @dinhngtu It's possible to run hooks inside the control domain on different stages of VM lifecycle operations, but these need to be installed beforehand, see https://xapi-project.github.io/new-docs/xenopsd/design/hooks/index.html

                      I think the vm-pre-suspend is the name of the hook the does this, but I can't confirm it. The docuementation is missing the hook, but it exists in the source code: https://github.com/xapi-project/xen-api/blob/master/ocaml/xenopsd/lib/xenops_hooks.ml#L37

                      D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • D Offline
                        dinhngtu Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @psafont
                        last edited by dinhngtu

                        @psafont Looks like these hooks are for suspend-resume rather than snapshot/backups? I couldn't find any mention of hook calls during the snapshot process

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post