XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Spread the backup load across servers

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    6 Posts 2 Posters 210 Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M Offline
      markhewitt1978
      last edited by markhewitt1978

      I have a backups server which also hosts XOA which has a 10GBit NIC. I have around 30 xcp-ng servers which need to be backed up to that server - these all have 1GBit NICs.

      It would be good if when doing a Delta Backup XO would, where possible, choose a different physical server for each of the concurrent backups it is doing. Thus reducing load on the physical host and meaning that I can get a much greater throughput as the backups server is capable of accepting the output from 10x servers.

      Instead I've just started a backup with a concurrency of 10 and it started all of those backups on the same server.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • olivierlambertO Offline
        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
        last edited by

        This is only possible if you have local SRs on your hosts. In a shared SR case, it's always the master that doing all the work.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M Offline
          markhewitt1978
          last edited by markhewitt1978

          Hi,
          This isn't servers in a pool. They are all single node xcp-ng installs connected seperately to XO. All using their own local storage.

          I'm using smart backup to back up from some 23 individual servers. Yet when I started the backup all 10 backup jobs started backing up the same server.

          I'm not sure if it is by design or not, just a suggestion that it would be better that it chose different servers whereever possible.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • olivierlambertO Offline
            olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
            last edited by

            In this case, you might want to use XO proxies. Each proxy will handle n pool, so the backup transfer speed can be spread around those.

            However, it will work better if you have a remote that's fast enough (otherwise, it might become the new bottleneck at some point).

            Proxy in beta will come very soon (it's a matter of days)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M Offline
              markhewitt1978
              last edited by

              It does perhaps just require a bit of logic in the backups to choose another xcp-ng server if there's already a backup going on with one of them. Proxies are good but perhaps overkill for solving this issue.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M Offline
                markhewitt1978
                last edited by

                For the moment I've had to create several backup jobs instead of one big backup it's e.g. servers01-06, 07-12, 13-18. Which isn't ideal as it's harder to manage, but is what it is!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post