XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback ๐Ÿš€

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    792 Posts 89 Posters 1.3m Views 69 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B Offline
      bufanda @stormi
      last edited by

      @stormi Yeah sure, just thought it may help with the issue that was reported if the container used is outdated.

      But anyways to the topic of XPC-NG 8.3beta. Are there any updates planned in the near future it has been a while since I recieved Updates on my test cluster. And while I don't run an AMD Processor on my test cluster there were security fixes for 8.2 but they didn't made to my 8.3 or did the repo config change and I missed that?

      stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • stormiS Offline
        stormi Vates ๐Ÿช XCP-ng Team @bufanda
        last edited by stormi

        @bufanda So, yes, we have a big update in the pipe, but we still have bits to tweak before we can push it to all testers.

        Regarding security updates, we don't offer any guarantee regarding the update delay on the beta, until the final release.

        B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • B Offline
          bufanda @stormi
          last edited by

          @stormi Thx for the info. And I understand that there is no guarantee, was just curious if I had a problem on my cluster or if there was really nothing inbetween. It's a test cluster in the end so no mission critical things running on it anyways.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • T Offline
            ThierryC01 @florent
            last edited by

            @florent on the 8.3 beta1 with the latest XOA available I have tested the creation of a new NFS remote with success.

            I tried to create a new SMB connection with a wrong password to test the edit and it worked perfectly, the only thing is that the alert that showed up during the wrong password connection does not disappear once the connection is established with a correct password even after multiple page refresh, disable, enable, refresh.

            Xcp-ng 8.3 remote.png

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • A Offline
              archw
              last edited by

              As part of the learning process, I've now upgraded three machines from 8.3 to 8.3 beta 1. In each case, it did not upgrade the host. Instead it overwrote what was there and I had to reinstall the VM's from backup. Not the end of the world, just thought y'all might want to know.

              DanpD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A Offline
                archw
                last edited by julien-f

                I'm trying to migrate an esxi VM to XCP-ng.

                1. The VM is turned off.
                2. "Thin mode" is off
                3. "Stop the source VM" is off
                4. "Stop on error" is on.

                I have tried doing this:
                A. through vcenter
                B. drive to the esxi host
                C. using the IP address in lieu of the dns name.

                In each case, as soon as I click "Import" I get the message below.

                vm.importMultipleFromEsxi
                {
                  "concurrency": 2,
                  "host": "vcenter.internal.local",
                  "network": "ca618529-000b-0c6e-52ba-f6c985134163",
                  "password": "* obfuscated *",
                  "sr": "b3b03de1-f7d1-92ca-68a4-40370e7649d3",
                  "sslVerify": false,
                  "stopOnError": true,
                  "stopSource": false,
                  "thin": false,
                  "user": "adminname@vspehere.locall",
                  "vms": [
                    "vm-2215"
                  ]
                }
                {
                  "succeeded": {},
                  "message": "Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'startsWith')",
                  "name": "TypeError",
                  "stack": "TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'startsWith')
                    at Esxi.#inspectVmdk (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202312090402/@xen-orchestra/vmware-explorer/esxi.mjs:209:18)
                    at Esxi.getTransferableVmMetadata (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202312090402/@xen-orchestra/vmware-explorer/esxi.mjs:293:40)
                    at Task.runInside (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202312090402/@vates/task/index.js:158:22)
                    at Task.run (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202312090402/@vates/task/index.js:141:20)
                    at MigrateVm.migrationfromEsxi (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202312090402/packages/xo-server/src/xo-mixins/migrate-vm.mjs:177:28)
                    at file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202312090402/packages/xo-server/src/api/vm.mjs:1415:30
                    at Task.runInside (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202312090402/@vates/task/index.js:158:22)
                    at Task.run (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202312090402/@vates/task/index.js:141:20)
                    at asyncEach.concurrency.concurrency (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202312090402/packages/xo-server/src/api/vm.mjs:1413:11)"
                }
                
                stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stormiS Offline
                  stormi Vates ๐Ÿช XCP-ng Team @archw
                  last edited by

                  @archw As far as I can tell, this is related to Xen Orchestra (which handles the import from VMware), rather than to XCP-ng 8.3. Maybe you can open a dedicated thread for your issue?

                  A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DanpD Online
                    Danp Pro Support Team @archw
                    last edited by

                    @archw said in XCP-ng 8.3 beta ๐Ÿš€:

                    As part of the learning process, I've now upgraded three machines from 8.3 to 8.3 beta 1. In each case, it did not upgrade the host. Instead it overwrote what was there and I had to reinstall the VM's from backup.

                    I assume that's a typo and you were upgrading from 8.2 to 8.3 beta. Your feedback would be more beneficial if you shared some additional details, such as --

                    • Were these hosts in separate pools or a shared pool?
                    • Explain the process you followed to perform each upgrade
                    • etc
                    A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A Offline
                      archw @Danp
                      last edited by

                      @Danp

                      oops...yes...that's a typo and I was upgrading from 8.2 to 8.3 beta.

                      "Were these hosts in separate pools or a shared pool?"
                      They were on separate pools (I'm I understand you correctly). Its just one XCP-NG machine.

                      "Explain the process you followed to perform each upgrade"

                      I booted from the 8.3 DVD then just followed the instructions on the install screens accepting the defaults as I went along.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • A Offline
                        archw @stormi
                        last edited by

                        @stormi

                        OK! I wasn't sure if it was ok to post that over there since this is on a beta machine.

                        Thanks!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • J Offline
                          john.c
                          last edited by john.c

                          When performing a reboot during the installation of XCP-ng 8.3 beta its currently not ejecting the installation media at the appropriate point.

                          This needs to occur so that the system will not attempt to do another boot from the installation media. This is especially important when the installation has completed, so that it can be ensured that the system will not boot from it again.

                          stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stormiS Offline
                            stormi Vates ๐Ÿช XCP-ng Team @john.c
                            last edited by

                            @john-c Thanks for the feedback. This is not new behaviour, in fact, though I agree it could be better. In the end, the installer tells you everything is ok and that you should eject the medium before rebooting.

                            J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • J Offline
                              john.c @stormi
                              last edited by john.c

                              @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.3 beta ๐Ÿš€:

                              @john-c Thanks for the feedback. This is not new behaviour, in fact, though I agree it could be better. In the end, the installer tells you everything is ok and that you should eject the medium before rebooting.

                              It may not be new behaviour but there's KVM client software and/or hardware which give messages if you try an unmount (eject) through them, rather than the using console commands ("eject"). Also it would help when doing the installation through SSH remotely.

                              If XCP-ng were to do it automatically itself it can then be sure that it was done at the right point, as some installation ISO sessions don't do well when ejected (unmounted) manually by the user at the wrong point. As CentOS 7 when using its installation ISO needs to do some actions during shutdown or preparations for reboot.

                              So at the very end of those preparations just before the reboot the installation media could automatically eject itself.

                              A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • A Offline
                                archw
                                last edited by

                                Last night, a bunch of new updates came out for the beta of 8.3. After rebooting none of my VMโ€˜s that have the boot firmware set to UEFI will boot.

                                Even if I try to create a new VM, if I set it to UEFI, a very quick black screen goes by (and it looks like it starts with the words โ€œGuest has not initializedโ€ but it goes by so fast you canโ€™t see the rest of the words).

                                If you change it from UEFI back to bios it boots.

                                Any ideas?

                                stormiS W T 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • stormiS Offline
                                  stormi Vates ๐Ÿช XCP-ng Team @archw
                                  last edited by

                                  @archw Are your VMs set to enable Secure Boot?

                                  A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • W Offline
                                    wilsonqanda @archw
                                    last edited by wilsonqanda

                                    @archw Glad this is not only me I just add a post regarding this as well.

                                    But this occur on my VMs as well on all my host and any new host i update to the latest revision in 8.3b (update 12/21/2023 note the previous 8.3b without the new patch work fine).

                                    All i know is that when changing to UEFI to bios or default bios will work. It is stuck on boot loader count down instead. When i play with the boot loader and change the time to 0 PFSense boot fine. But if i change it to any # it will get stuck until i manually hit "enter". I haven't test it with all FreeBSD to see if this is the case but PFSense is a FreeBSD. But pretty sure something change in XCP-ng to cause this issue for the uefi setting in the lastest update.

                                    (FYI none of them have secure boot so shouldn't matter i believe).

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • stormiS Offline
                                      stormi Vates ๐Ÿช XCP-ng Team
                                      last edited by stormi

                                      It's concerning that our internal CI didn't show any such issue. Can any of you open a support tunnel from XOA and open a support ticket so that I may have a direct look?

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • stormiS Offline
                                        stormi Vates ๐Ÿช XCP-ng Team
                                        last edited by stormi

                                        So, on a 8.3 alpha 2 where I imported UEFI VMs and then updated up to beta 2, the UEFI VMs still work.

                                        I'll now try starting from 8.2.1, upgrading to alpha2 and then updating to beta2.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • A Offline
                                          archw @stormi
                                          last edited by

                                          @stormi
                                          No...but, last night, for the heck of it, I tried turning it on, trying to boot, then turned it off. Nothing worked.

                                          stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • A Offline
                                            archw @stormi
                                            last edited by

                                            @stormi
                                            nopie!

                                            stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post