XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    792 Posts 89 Posters 1.3m Views 69 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P Offline
      ph7 @ph7
      last edited by

      @ph7 said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀:

      Upgrade to RC2 worked fine so far with netinstall ISO in ventoy on a 8 gen i5 HP laptop. And a "full" ISO on its own USB on a Lenovo Thinkcentre Ryzen 5 2400GE 🚀

      2 days ago I upgraded my fully patched Ryzen 5 RC1 to RC2 by ISO.
      Unfortunately I also upgraded my XO to commit aa490.
      All backup jobs since then has triggered CPU performance alerts on my backed up delta, offline VM, XCP-ng host and the VM running XO.
      I will update the XO to latest commit today.
      Are there any changes in RC2 that could cause this?
      I have only received 1 alert on high memory earlier.

      stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • PierreP Offline
        Pierre @stormi
        last edited by

        ISO update (as recommended) for my pool of three XCP-ng 8.3 RC1 hypervisors.
        Everything went perfectly for each server.
        I had to reinstall the additional packages (traceroute vim-enhanced mtr etc...), re-enable LLDP advertisements on the network interfaces (lldptool -L -i eth0 adminStatus=rxtx) and recreate the multipath configuration file (/etc/multipath/conf.d/huawei.conf).
        In short, nothing seems abnormal.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • Tristis OrisT Offline
          Tristis Oris Top contributor
          last edited by

          can't install zabbix on 8.3.

          yum install -y zabbix-agent2 zabbix-agent2-plugin-*
          
          Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
          Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
          Resolving Dependencies
          --> Running transaction check
          ---> Package zabbix-agent2.x86_64 0:7.0.3-release1.el7 will be installed
          --> Processing Dependency: libpcre2-8.so.0()(64bit) for package: zabbix-agent2-7.0.3-release1.el7.x86_64
          ---> Package zabbix-agent2-plugin-ember-plus.x86_64 0:7.0.3-release1.el7 will be installed
          ---> Package zabbix-agent2-plugin-mongodb.x86_64 0:7.0.3-release1.el7 will be installed
          ---> Package zabbix-agent2-plugin-mssql.x86_64 0:7.0.3-release1.el7 will be installed
          ---> Package zabbix-agent2-plugin-postgresql.x86_64 0:7.0.3-release1.el7 will be installed
          --> Finished Dependency Resolution
          Error: Package: zabbix-agent2-7.0.3-release1.el7.x86_64 (zabbix)
                     Requires: libpcre2-8.so.0()(64bit)
           You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
           You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
          

          at 8.2 i only need to enable more repos, but 8.3 already use it own Vates mirror for Centos.

          yum install pcre2 --enablerepo=epel,base,sources
          
          Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
          Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
           * epel: ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de
          No package pcre2 available.
          Error: Nothing to do
          
          stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • stormiS Offline
            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @ph7
            last edited by

            @ph7 I don't see much changes which may lead to this result at first sight.

            P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • stormiS Offline
              stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Tristis Oris
              last edited by

              @Tristis-Oris said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀:

              yum install pcre2 --enablerepo=epel,base,sources

              It is indeed missing. I must have missed something when I replicated the repository from CentOS vault.

              stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • N Offline
                nomad
                last edited by

                Ok, I'm feeling dumb. I just mounted the guest tools ISO (hosts -> hostname -> console -> "select disk(s)" pulldown, select "guest-tools.iso") and I'm seeing kinda old versions of xe-guest-utilities (-2 instead of -12).

                : || lvd@vm42 ~ [1023] ; ls -l /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities*rpm
                -r--r--r--. 1 root root 985556 Dec 11 2023 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-2.i386.rpm
                -r--r--r--. 1 root root 985384 Dec 11 2023 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-2.legacy.i386.rpm
                -r--r--r--. 1 root root 1246820 Dec 11 2023 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-2.legacy.x86_64.rpm
                -r--r--r--. 1 root root 1247000 Dec 11 2023 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-2.x86_64.rpm

                When I do the same on my production 8.2.1 pool I see

                : || lvd@chipmunkdev ~ [1000] ; ls -l /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities*rpm
                -r--r--r--. 1 root root 985488 Feb 7 2024 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-12.i386.rpm
                -r--r--r--. 1 root root 985308 Feb 7 2024 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-12.legacy.i386.rpm
                -r--r--r--. 1 root root 1246760 Feb 7 2024 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-12.legacy.x86_64.rpm
                -r--r--r--. 1 root root 1246948 Feb 7 2024 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-12.x86_64.rpm

                Should I be looking somewhere else for the most recent xe-guest-utilities?

                stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • P Offline
                  ph7 @stormi
                  last edited by

                  @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀:

                  @ph7 I don't see much changes which may lead to this result at first sight.

                  Same alert today with commit 63a88
                  Should I report this in Home / Xen Orchestra / Backup ?

                  stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stormiS Offline
                    stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @ph7
                    last edited by

                    @ph7 If you can test with an older version of XO and see if the issue is still present, this might help understanding whether it's an XO issue or not. But I think you can also already create a dedicated topic where XO devs can tell if they see what this could be.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stormiS Offline
                      stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @nomad
                      last edited by

                      @nomad Good point!

                      So, they are the same tools (8.2 got the update later, based on that of 8.3), but the version is defined in a peculiar way (based on the release of the RPM, which I mistakingly re-initialized to 1 on XCP-ng 8.3). I'll fix this, but you can already use them if you need them.

                      N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • N Offline
                        nomad @stormi
                        last edited by

                        @stormi If it's the exact same thing just with a different version number I can wait for a future update. I already have the -12 RPM in my yum repo for automatic install on all VMs.

                        I was looking to see if there was any notable changes from what we already had as well to see if an icon for AlmaLinux would show up in the home -> VMs list (everything else has an icon showing the OS running on the VM, just poor Alma is left all alone at the display ball.)

                        stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stormiS Offline
                          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @nomad
                          last edited by stormi

                          @nomad There are two key players in this icon thing: the guest tools who report the OS name (this already works), and then Xen Orchestra matching this to an icon. In Xen Orchestra 5, the icon set is not easy to expand, so the developers said this would be done in XO 6.

                          N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • N Offline
                            nomad @stormi
                            last edited by

                            @stormi I'm glad to know I was slightly right about some of the way it works anyway.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • I Offline
                              imaginapix
                              last edited by

                              Just to give some short feedback about upgrade from 8.3 beta to 8.3rc2 via ISO:

                              1. Pool master upgraded fine after selecting "Upgrade existing installation"
                              2. 2nd host in pool asked for management network configuration after selecting "Upgrade existing installation", but after that everything upgraded fine
                              3. Both host show "cloud" instead a build number after the upgrade
                                XCP-NG_Build.png
                              4. Guest tools version number of/reseted to .2, but this is already discussed earlier

                              All in all very smooth upgrade and everything is running as before - great work from the Vates team !

                              stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • stormiS Offline
                                stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @imaginapix
                                last edited by stormi

                                @imaginapix The build number doesn't have any real signification for XCP-ng, in fact. We wanted to change it to a timestamps or something, but it was already late in the release process and even if we haven't found any reason to think changing the build number could break anything now, I decided to keep it as is just in case.

                                AlexanderKA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • AlexanderKA Offline
                                  AlexanderK @stormi
                                  last edited by

                                  will xcp-ng 8.3 work with cloudstack?

                                  stormiS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • stormiS Offline
                                    stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @AlexanderK
                                    last edited by

                                    @AlexanderK We don't test it, but they use XAPI and the API doesn't change that much, so it should. We contacted them last april and they said any necessary changes on CloudStack side should be done after the release.

                                    https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8964

                                    AlexanderKA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • AlexanderKA Offline
                                      AlexanderK @stormi
                                      last edited by

                                      @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀:

                                      @AlexanderK We don't test it, but they use XAPI and the API doesn't change that much, so it should. We contacted them last april and they said any necessary changes on CloudStack side should be done after the release.

                                      https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8964

                                      when there was the update of 8.2.1 there have been many issues...
                                      anyway...i think 8.3 is not an lts... so i will wait and check at a lab enviroments
                                      Thanks for the reply!

                                      stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • stormiS Offline
                                        stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @AlexanderK
                                        last edited by

                                        @AlexanderK Then maybe you can remind them of the past issues so that they look at XCP-ng 8.3 ahead of time (especially knowing that we are going to release very soon)

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • stormiS Offline
                                          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @stormi
                                          last edited by

                                          @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀:

                                          @Tristis-Oris said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀:

                                          yum install pcre2 --enablerepo=epel,base,sources

                                          It is indeed missing. I must have missed something when I replicated the repository from CentOS vault.

                                          Aaaaand... It's fixed now.

                                          A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • stormiS Offline
                                            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @AlexanderK
                                            last edited by

                                            Here are new updates for XCP-ng 8.3.0. In theory, the last ones before the final release:

                                            • sm-3.2.3-1.7.xcpng8.3: beta support for XOSTOR (which will become available for production a bit after the release of XCP-ng 8.3.0)
                                            • xapi-24.19.2-1.4.xcpng8.3 (and the numerous RPM packages that come from that build): a small IPv6-related fix, but I won't detail it here because another fix is needed so that the first fix is really useful 😅. There will be more fixes related to IPv6 shortly after the release of XCP-ng 8.3.0.
                                            • xcp-ng-pv-tools-8.3-12.xcpng8.3: fixed the package versions (no changes but the displayed version).
                                            • xsconsole-11.0.6-1.2.xcpng8.3: add the ability to join a pool from XSConsole when the primary address type is IPv6.

                                            We also made one change to the installer since the RC2 release: the installer will now refuse to upgrade if the host's certificate size is too small (which would prevent XAPI from being able to communicate with clients or other hosts!). The release notes will document how to change the key before doing an upgrade. Most users who initially installed XCP-ng with a version lower than 8.0 were likely to fall into this trap, so we made these two last minute changes to prevent it:

                                            • On XCP-ng side: the installer check described above.
                                            • On Xen Orchestra side: a warning on pools which have "small" host keys.
                                            F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                            • First post
                                              Last post