XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    792 Posts 89 Posters 1.3m Views 69 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • N Offline
      nomad @stormi
      last edited by nomad

      @stormi It was user error.

      /etc/hosts wasn't preserved and the storage NAS isn't in DNS.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • N Offline
        nomad
        last edited by

        @nomad said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€:

        plug-late-sr

        Looks like this RPM isn't available in 8.3 yet. Please remember to make it available as we need it.

        It was created for Ticket#7714169

        thanks!

        stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stormiS Offline
          stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @nomad
          last edited by

          @nomad @ronan-a is on it. It's built but not made available in the base repository yet.

          N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P Online
            ph7 @ph7
            last edited by

            @ph7 said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€:

            Upgrade to RC2 worked fine so far with netinstall ISO in ventoy on a 8 gen i5 HP laptop. And a "full" ISO on its own USB on a Lenovo Thinkcentre Ryzen 5 2400GE πŸš€

            2 days ago I upgraded my fully patched Ryzen 5 RC1 to RC2 by ISO.
            Unfortunately I also upgraded my XO to commit aa490.
            All backup jobs since then has triggered CPU performance alerts on my backed up delta, offline VM, XCP-ng host and the VM running XO.
            I will update the XO to latest commit today.
            Are there any changes in RC2 that could cause this?
            I have only received 1 alert on high memory earlier.

            stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • PierreP Offline
              Pierre @stormi
              last edited by

              ISO update (as recommended) for my pool of three XCP-ng 8.3 RC1 hypervisors.
              Everything went perfectly for each server.
              I had to reinstall the additional packages (traceroute vim-enhanced mtr etc...), re-enable LLDP advertisements on the network interfaces (lldptool -L -i eth0 adminStatus=rxtx) and recreate the multipath configuration file (/etc/multipath/conf.d/huawei.conf).
              In short, nothing seems abnormal.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • Tristis OrisT Offline
                Tristis Oris Top contributor
                last edited by

                can't install zabbix on 8.3.

                yum install -y zabbix-agent2 zabbix-agent2-plugin-*
                
                Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
                Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
                Resolving Dependencies
                --> Running transaction check
                ---> Package zabbix-agent2.x86_64 0:7.0.3-release1.el7 will be installed
                --> Processing Dependency: libpcre2-8.so.0()(64bit) for package: zabbix-agent2-7.0.3-release1.el7.x86_64
                ---> Package zabbix-agent2-plugin-ember-plus.x86_64 0:7.0.3-release1.el7 will be installed
                ---> Package zabbix-agent2-plugin-mongodb.x86_64 0:7.0.3-release1.el7 will be installed
                ---> Package zabbix-agent2-plugin-mssql.x86_64 0:7.0.3-release1.el7 will be installed
                ---> Package zabbix-agent2-plugin-postgresql.x86_64 0:7.0.3-release1.el7 will be installed
                --> Finished Dependency Resolution
                Error: Package: zabbix-agent2-7.0.3-release1.el7.x86_64 (zabbix)
                           Requires: libpcre2-8.so.0()(64bit)
                 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
                 You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
                

                at 8.2 i only need to enable more repos, but 8.3 already use it own Vates mirror for Centos.

                yum install pcre2 --enablerepo=epel,base,sources
                
                Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
                Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
                 * epel: ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de
                No package pcre2 available.
                Error: Nothing to do
                
                stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • stormiS Offline
                  stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @ph7
                  last edited by

                  @ph7 I don't see much changes which may lead to this result at first sight.

                  P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • stormiS Offline
                    stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @Tristis Oris
                    last edited by

                    @Tristis-Oris said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€:

                    yum install pcre2 --enablerepo=epel,base,sources

                    It is indeed missing. I must have missed something when I replicated the repository from CentOS vault.

                    stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                    • N Offline
                      nomad
                      last edited by

                      Ok, I'm feeling dumb. I just mounted the guest tools ISO (hosts -> hostname -> console -> "select disk(s)" pulldown, select "guest-tools.iso") and I'm seeing kinda old versions of xe-guest-utilities (-2 instead of -12).

                      : || lvd@vm42 ~ [1023] ; ls -l /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities*rpm
                      -r--r--r--. 1 root root 985556 Dec 11 2023 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-2.i386.rpm
                      -r--r--r--. 1 root root 985384 Dec 11 2023 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-2.legacy.i386.rpm
                      -r--r--r--. 1 root root 1246820 Dec 11 2023 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-2.legacy.x86_64.rpm
                      -r--r--r--. 1 root root 1247000 Dec 11 2023 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-2.x86_64.rpm

                      When I do the same on my production 8.2.1 pool I see

                      : || lvd@chipmunkdev ~ [1000] ; ls -l /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities*rpm
                      -r--r--r--. 1 root root 985488 Feb 7 2024 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-12.i386.rpm
                      -r--r--r--. 1 root root 985308 Feb 7 2024 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-12.legacy.i386.rpm
                      -r--r--r--. 1 root root 1246760 Feb 7 2024 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-12.legacy.x86_64.rpm
                      -r--r--r--. 1 root root 1246948 Feb 7 2024 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-12.x86_64.rpm

                      Should I be looking somewhere else for the most recent xe-guest-utilities?

                      stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • P Online
                        ph7 @stormi
                        last edited by

                        @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€:

                        @ph7 I don't see much changes which may lead to this result at first sight.

                        Same alert today with commit 63a88
                        Should I report this in Home / Xen Orchestra / Backup ?

                        stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stormiS Offline
                          stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @ph7
                          last edited by

                          @ph7 If you can test with an older version of XO and see if the issue is still present, this might help understanding whether it's an XO issue or not. But I think you can also already create a dedicated topic where XO devs can tell if they see what this could be.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stormiS Offline
                            stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @nomad
                            last edited by

                            @nomad Good point!

                            So, they are the same tools (8.2 got the update later, based on that of 8.3), but the version is defined in a peculiar way (based on the release of the RPM, which I mistakingly re-initialized to 1 on XCP-ng 8.3). I'll fix this, but you can already use them if you need them.

                            N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • N Offline
                              nomad @stormi
                              last edited by

                              @stormi If it's the exact same thing just with a different version number I can wait for a future update. I already have the -12 RPM in my yum repo for automatic install on all VMs.

                              I was looking to see if there was any notable changes from what we already had as well to see if an icon for AlmaLinux would show up in the home -> VMs list (everything else has an icon showing the OS running on the VM, just poor Alma is left all alone at the display ball.)

                              stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stormiS Offline
                                stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @nomad
                                last edited by stormi

                                @nomad There are two key players in this icon thing: the guest tools who report the OS name (this already works), and then Xen Orchestra matching this to an icon. In Xen Orchestra 5, the icon set is not easy to expand, so the developers said this would be done in XO 6.

                                N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • N Offline
                                  nomad @stormi
                                  last edited by

                                  @stormi I'm glad to know I was slightly right about some of the way it works anyway.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • I Offline
                                    imaginapix
                                    last edited by

                                    Just to give some short feedback about upgrade from 8.3 beta to 8.3rc2 via ISO:

                                    1. Pool master upgraded fine after selecting "Upgrade existing installation"
                                    2. 2nd host in pool asked for management network configuration after selecting "Upgrade existing installation", but after that everything upgraded fine
                                    3. Both host show "cloud" instead a build number after the upgrade
                                      XCP-NG_Build.png
                                    4. Guest tools version number of/reseted to .2, but this is already discussed earlier

                                    All in all very smooth upgrade and everything is running as before - great work from the Vates team !

                                    stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • stormiS Offline
                                      stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @imaginapix
                                      last edited by stormi

                                      @imaginapix The build number doesn't have any real signification for XCP-ng, in fact. We wanted to change it to a timestamps or something, but it was already late in the release process and even if we haven't found any reason to think changing the build number could break anything now, I decided to keep it as is just in case.

                                      AlexanderKA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • AlexanderKA Offline
                                        AlexanderK @stormi
                                        last edited by

                                        will xcp-ng 8.3 work with cloudstack?

                                        stormiS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • stormiS Offline
                                          stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @AlexanderK
                                          last edited by

                                          @AlexanderK We don't test it, but they use XAPI and the API doesn't change that much, so it should. We contacted them last april and they said any necessary changes on CloudStack side should be done after the release.

                                          https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8964

                                          AlexanderKA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • AlexanderKA Offline
                                            AlexanderK @stormi
                                            last edited by

                                            @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€:

                                            @AlexanderK We don't test it, but they use XAPI and the API doesn't change that much, so it should. We contacted them last april and they said any necessary changes on CloudStack side should be done after the release.

                                            https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8964

                                            when there was the update of 8.2.1 there have been many issues...
                                            anyway...i think 8.3 is not an lts... so i will wait and check at a lab enviroments
                                            Thanks for the reply!

                                            stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post