XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    792 Posts 89 Posters 1.4m Views 69 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • PierreP Offline
      Pierre @stormi
      last edited by

      ISO update (as recommended) for my pool of three XCP-ng 8.3 RC1 hypervisors.
      Everything went perfectly for each server.
      I had to reinstall the additional packages (traceroute vim-enhanced mtr etc...), re-enable LLDP advertisements on the network interfaces (lldptool -L -i eth0 adminStatus=rxtx) and recreate the multipath configuration file (/etc/multipath/conf.d/huawei.conf).
      In short, nothing seems abnormal.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • Tristis OrisT Offline
        Tristis Oris Top contributor
        last edited by

        can't install zabbix on 8.3.

        yum install -y zabbix-agent2 zabbix-agent2-plugin-*
        
        Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
        Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
        Resolving Dependencies
        --> Running transaction check
        ---> Package zabbix-agent2.x86_64 0:7.0.3-release1.el7 will be installed
        --> Processing Dependency: libpcre2-8.so.0()(64bit) for package: zabbix-agent2-7.0.3-release1.el7.x86_64
        ---> Package zabbix-agent2-plugin-ember-plus.x86_64 0:7.0.3-release1.el7 will be installed
        ---> Package zabbix-agent2-plugin-mongodb.x86_64 0:7.0.3-release1.el7 will be installed
        ---> Package zabbix-agent2-plugin-mssql.x86_64 0:7.0.3-release1.el7 will be installed
        ---> Package zabbix-agent2-plugin-postgresql.x86_64 0:7.0.3-release1.el7 will be installed
        --> Finished Dependency Resolution
        Error: Package: zabbix-agent2-7.0.3-release1.el7.x86_64 (zabbix)
                   Requires: libpcre2-8.so.0()(64bit)
         You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
         You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
        

        at 8.2 i only need to enable more repos, but 8.3 already use it own Vates mirror for Centos.

        yum install pcre2 --enablerepo=epel,base,sources
        
        Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
        Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
         * epel: ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de
        No package pcre2 available.
        Error: Nothing to do
        
        stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • stormiS Offline
          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @ph7
          last edited by

          @ph7 I don't see much changes which may lead to this result at first sight.

          P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • stormiS Offline
            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Tristis Oris
            last edited by

            @Tristis-Oris said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀:

            yum install pcre2 --enablerepo=epel,base,sources

            It is indeed missing. I must have missed something when I replicated the repository from CentOS vault.

            stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • N Offline
              nomad
              last edited by

              Ok, I'm feeling dumb. I just mounted the guest tools ISO (hosts -> hostname -> console -> "select disk(s)" pulldown, select "guest-tools.iso") and I'm seeing kinda old versions of xe-guest-utilities (-2 instead of -12).

              : || lvd@vm42 ~ [1023] ; ls -l /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities*rpm
              -r--r--r--. 1 root root 985556 Dec 11 2023 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-2.i386.rpm
              -r--r--r--. 1 root root 985384 Dec 11 2023 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-2.legacy.i386.rpm
              -r--r--r--. 1 root root 1246820 Dec 11 2023 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-2.legacy.x86_64.rpm
              -r--r--r--. 1 root root 1247000 Dec 11 2023 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-2.x86_64.rpm

              When I do the same on my production 8.2.1 pool I see

              : || lvd@chipmunkdev ~ [1000] ; ls -l /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities*rpm
              -r--r--r--. 1 root root 985488 Feb 7 2024 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-12.i386.rpm
              -r--r--r--. 1 root root 985308 Feb 7 2024 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-12.legacy.i386.rpm
              -r--r--r--. 1 root root 1246760 Feb 7 2024 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-12.legacy.x86_64.rpm
              -r--r--r--. 1 root root 1246948 Feb 7 2024 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-12.x86_64.rpm

              Should I be looking somewhere else for the most recent xe-guest-utilities?

              stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • P Offline
                ph7 @stormi
                last edited by

                @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀:

                @ph7 I don't see much changes which may lead to this result at first sight.

                Same alert today with commit 63a88
                Should I report this in Home / Xen Orchestra / Backup ?

                stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stormiS Offline
                  stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @ph7
                  last edited by

                  @ph7 If you can test with an older version of XO and see if the issue is still present, this might help understanding whether it's an XO issue or not. But I think you can also already create a dedicated topic where XO devs can tell if they see what this could be.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stormiS Offline
                    stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @nomad
                    last edited by

                    @nomad Good point!

                    So, they are the same tools (8.2 got the update later, based on that of 8.3), but the version is defined in a peculiar way (based on the release of the RPM, which I mistakingly re-initialized to 1 on XCP-ng 8.3). I'll fix this, but you can already use them if you need them.

                    N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • N Offline
                      nomad @stormi
                      last edited by

                      @stormi If it's the exact same thing just with a different version number I can wait for a future update. I already have the -12 RPM in my yum repo for automatic install on all VMs.

                      I was looking to see if there was any notable changes from what we already had as well to see if an icon for AlmaLinux would show up in the home -> VMs list (everything else has an icon showing the OS running on the VM, just poor Alma is left all alone at the display ball.)

                      stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stormiS Offline
                        stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @nomad
                        last edited by stormi

                        @nomad There are two key players in this icon thing: the guest tools who report the OS name (this already works), and then Xen Orchestra matching this to an icon. In Xen Orchestra 5, the icon set is not easy to expand, so the developers said this would be done in XO 6.

                        N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • N Offline
                          nomad @stormi
                          last edited by

                          @stormi I'm glad to know I was slightly right about some of the way it works anyway.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • I Offline
                            imaginapix
                            last edited by

                            Just to give some short feedback about upgrade from 8.3 beta to 8.3rc2 via ISO:

                            1. Pool master upgraded fine after selecting "Upgrade existing installation"
                            2. 2nd host in pool asked for management network configuration after selecting "Upgrade existing installation", but after that everything upgraded fine
                            3. Both host show "cloud" instead a build number after the upgrade
                              XCP-NG_Build.png
                            4. Guest tools version number of/reseted to .2, but this is already discussed earlier

                            All in all very smooth upgrade and everything is running as before - great work from the Vates team !

                            stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • stormiS Offline
                              stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @imaginapix
                              last edited by stormi

                              @imaginapix The build number doesn't have any real signification for XCP-ng, in fact. We wanted to change it to a timestamps or something, but it was already late in the release process and even if we haven't found any reason to think changing the build number could break anything now, I decided to keep it as is just in case.

                              AlexanderKA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • AlexanderKA Offline
                                AlexanderK @stormi
                                last edited by

                                will xcp-ng 8.3 work with cloudstack?

                                stormiS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • stormiS Offline
                                  stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @AlexanderK
                                  last edited by

                                  @AlexanderK We don't test it, but they use XAPI and the API doesn't change that much, so it should. We contacted them last april and they said any necessary changes on CloudStack side should be done after the release.

                                  https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8964

                                  AlexanderKA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • AlexanderKA Offline
                                    AlexanderK @stormi
                                    last edited by

                                    @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀:

                                    @AlexanderK We don't test it, but they use XAPI and the API doesn't change that much, so it should. We contacted them last april and they said any necessary changes on CloudStack side should be done after the release.

                                    https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8964

                                    when there was the update of 8.2.1 there have been many issues...
                                    anyway...i think 8.3 is not an lts... so i will wait and check at a lab enviroments
                                    Thanks for the reply!

                                    stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • stormiS Offline
                                      stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @AlexanderK
                                      last edited by

                                      @AlexanderK Then maybe you can remind them of the past issues so that they look at XCP-ng 8.3 ahead of time (especially knowing that we are going to release very soon)

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • stormiS Offline
                                        stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @stormi
                                        last edited by

                                        @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀:

                                        @Tristis-Oris said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀:

                                        yum install pcre2 --enablerepo=epel,base,sources

                                        It is indeed missing. I must have missed something when I replicated the repository from CentOS vault.

                                        Aaaaand... It's fixed now.

                                        A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • stormiS Offline
                                          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @AlexanderK
                                          last edited by

                                          Here are new updates for XCP-ng 8.3.0. In theory, the last ones before the final release:

                                          • sm-3.2.3-1.7.xcpng8.3: beta support for XOSTOR (which will become available for production a bit after the release of XCP-ng 8.3.0)
                                          • xapi-24.19.2-1.4.xcpng8.3 (and the numerous RPM packages that come from that build): a small IPv6-related fix, but I won't detail it here because another fix is needed so that the first fix is really useful 😅. There will be more fixes related to IPv6 shortly after the release of XCP-ng 8.3.0.
                                          • xcp-ng-pv-tools-8.3-12.xcpng8.3: fixed the package versions (no changes but the displayed version).
                                          • xsconsole-11.0.6-1.2.xcpng8.3: add the ability to join a pool from XSConsole when the primary address type is IPv6.

                                          We also made one change to the installer since the RC2 release: the installer will now refuse to upgrade if the host's certificate size is too small (which would prevent XAPI from being able to communicate with clients or other hosts!). The release notes will document how to change the key before doing an upgrade. Most users who initially installed XCP-ng with a version lower than 8.0 were likely to fall into this trap, so we made these two last minute changes to prevent it:

                                          • On XCP-ng side: the installer check described above.
                                          • On Xen Orchestra side: a warning on pools which have "small" host keys.
                                          F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                          • F Offline
                                            flakpyro @stormi
                                            last edited by

                                            @stormi Updated without issues however noticed it dumped some errors to the console on reboot.

                                            Checking into it i see the following in xensource.log

                                            /var/log/xensource.log-Sep 25 12:12:29 xcpng-prd-02 xcp-networkd: [ info||131 |server_init D:2740ee30f2da|network_utils] /usr/bin/ovs-vsctl --timeout=20 --bare -f table -- --columns=name find port fake_bridge=true tag=199
                                            /var/log/xensource.log:Sep 25 12:12:29 xcpng-prd-02 xcp-networkd: [error||131 |server_init D:2740ee30f2da|network_utils] Error in read one line of file: /sys/class/net/eth3/features, exception Unix.Unix_error(Unix.ENOENT, "open", "/sys/class/net/eth3/features")\x0ARaised by primitive operation at Xapi_stdext_unix__Unixext.with_file in file "ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-unix/unixext.ml", line 92, characters 11-40\x0ACalled from Xapi_stdext_unix__Unixext.buffer_of_file in file "ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-unix/unixext.ml" (inlined), line 177, characters 2-52\x0ACalled from Xapi_stdext_unix__Unixext.string_of_file in file "ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-unix/unixext.ml", line 179, characters 47-73\x0ACalled from Network_utils.Sysfs.read_one_line in file "ocaml/networkd/lib/network_utils.ml", line 160, characters 6-33\x0A
                                            **/var/log/xensource.log-Sep 25 12:12:29 xcpng-prd-02 xcp-networkd: [error||131 |server_init D:2740ee30f2da|network_utils] Caught unix error: No such file or directory [access, /usr/sbin/ovs-vlan-bug-workaround]**
                                            /var/log/xensource.log-Sep 25 12:12:29 xcpng-prd-02 xcp-networkd: [error||131 |server_init D:2740ee30f2da|network_utils] Assuming script /usr/sbin/ovs-vlan-bug-workaround doesn't exist
                                            
                                            

                                            Looking on hosts i haven't let patched i see this exists on them as well. It doesn't seem to affect anything. All hosts were ISO upgraded to RC2 last week.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post