XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    101 Posts 25 Posters 6.9k Views 38 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C Offline
      Clouseau @gskger
      last edited by

      Upgraded to testing as I had problem with coalesce on 8.3 and VDI of 330GB. Smaller one coalesced fine (50Gb and 100GB) but on 330G it run for 12sec and said something about timeout error. With testing packages coalesce is working fine.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • A Offline
        Andrew Top contributor @gduperrey
        last edited by

        @gduperrey Updates installed and running but I don't have 8.3 in production yet...

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • P Online
          ph7
          last edited by

          Tested OK on
          Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4710MQ CPU @ 2.50GHz

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • gduperreyG Offline
            gduperrey Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
            last edited by

            Update published: https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2025/01/23/january-2025-maintenance-update-for-xcp-ng-8-3/

            Thank you for the tests!

            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
            • M Offline
              manilx @gduperrey
              last edited by

              @gduperrey On my 2 hosts on the pool I did a yum update on the slave first. Idiot!
              It updated and rebooted. Now wanted to do the same on the master. Doesn't show any updates!

              How do I install the updates on the master now?

              gduperreyG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • gduperreyG Offline
                gduperrey Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @manilx
                last edited by

                @manilx Have you tried cleaning the yum cache on the master?

                yum clean metadata
                
                M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M Offline
                  manilx @gduperrey
                  last edited by

                  @gduperrey YES! Now the updates show. Updating.....

                  M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M Offline
                    manilx @manilx
                    last edited by

                    This post is deleted!
                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • G Offline
                      gb.123
                      last edited by gb.123

                      This post is deleted!
                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • G Offline
                        gb.123
                        last edited by

                        This post is deleted!
                        stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stormiS Offline
                          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @gb.123
                          last edited by

                          @gb.123 I doesn't seem directly related to this thread, which is dedicated to testing update candidates. Maybe open a new thread?

                          G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • G Offline
                            gb.123 @stormi
                            last edited by

                            @stormi

                            Done.
                            Since this I checked this after a while, I wasn't sure if it was related to update or independent. I have opened the new thread as you suggested in the 'Network' section

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • gduperreyG Offline
                              gduperrey Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                              last edited by

                              New update candidates for you to test!

                              A new batch of non-urgent updates is ready for user tests before a future collective release. Below are the details about these.

                              • edk2: Fix "Guest has not initialized the display (yet)." error.
                              • intel-igc: Fix a possible update issue due to a recent package name change.
                              • intel-microcode:
                                • Latest Intel release microcode-20250211:
                                  • Security updates for: INTEL-SA-01166, INTEL-SA-01213, INTEL-SA-01139, INTEL-SA-01228
                                  • Updates for multiple functional issues
                                  • Upstream update drops files for older Sapphire Rapids steppings, we kept the previous versions
                              • netdata:
                                • Update to Netdata v1.47.5
                                  • Fix dmesg warnings due to setuid+capabilities on xenstat plugin
                                  • Improve systemd service restart with a custom script waiting for Netdata to be fully up-and-running before stopping it.
                              • openssl: Add security fixes from upstream: CVE-2019-1547, CVE-2019-1551, CVE-2019-1563
                              • qemu: Backport a security fixe (CVE-2023-3354) for QEMU VNC server vulnerability
                              • r8125-module: Disable some performance functionalities in the driver (TXchecksum/SG/TSO) by default to workaround bugs on Windows Server 2022 guests. These can be re-enabled using 'ethtool -K eth0 tx on tso on sg on'
                              • sm:
                                • Fix issue where users may encounter problems with HPE Nimble arrays: unable to mount iSCSI LUNs, non-functional or imperfect multipathing.
                                • Regarding Large Block driver, always enable the VG on the emulated device.
                                • Prevent corruption in the LINSTOR KV-store caused by a race condition between user calls and GC.
                              • systemtap: No functional changes. Fix compilation for compatibility with new gcc version.
                              • xapi: Re-enabled nested virtualization in 8.3, with the same limitations as in 8.2.
                              • xcp-emu-manager: No functional changes, Fix rpm spec file for new cmake version
                              • xcp-ng-release: Update cipher list in .curlrc
                              • xcp-ng-xapi-plugins:
                                • Add new service plugin to manage (start, stop, ...) XCP-ng services
                                • Add a new ipmitool plugin to get information from ipmitool that:
                                  • Returns information about sensors
                                  • Returns ipmi lan information
                              • xen:
                                • Re-enabled nested virtualization in 8.3, with the same limitations as in 8.2.
                                • Fix XSA-467 / CVE-2025-1713
                              • xo-lite: update to version 0.8.0. For more information you can read latests posts on the Xen Orchestra blog: 0.7.1 & 0.8.0.

                              Regarding the nested virtualization, Xen-Orchestra is not yet updated to allow this in 8.3, even if we see the option in the advanced tab of the VM. They are working on it and this will come in a future update.

                              To actually enable the nested possibility, it must be done on the command line with xe.

                              Once your VM is created:

                              xe vm-param-set platform:nested-virt=true uuid=<vm-uuid>
                              

                              To check this:

                              xe vm-param-get param-name=platform uuid=<vm-uuid>
                              

                              You should have a line similar to below, with the nested-virt: true parameter visible:

                              nested-virt: true; timeoffset: 0; exp-nested-hvm: true; secureboot: false; device-model: qemu-upstream-compat; viridian: true; nx: true; acpi: 1; apic: true; pae:true; hpet:true
                              

                              To deactivate it:

                              xe vm-param-remove param-name=platform param-key=nested-virt uuid=<vm-uuid>
                              

                              For XOSTOR users:

                              • See the description for sm above.

                              (Reminder: XOSTOR is still in beta stage on XCP-ng 8.3)

                              Optional packages:

                              • Alternate Driver: Updated to newer version.
                                • atlantic-module-alt:
                                  • Update vendor version of driver 2.5.12
                                  • Disable LRO for reliable bridging per README
                                  • More information about drivers and current versions is on the drivers page: (https://github.com/xcp-ng/xcp/wiki/Drivers).

                              Test on XCP-ng 8.3

                              From an up-to-date host:

                              yum clean metadata --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing
                              yum update --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing
                              reboot
                              

                              The usual update rules apply: pool coordinator first, etc.

                              Versions

                              • edk2: 20220801-1.7.7.2.xcpng8.3
                              • intel-igc: 5.10.226-2.xcpng8.3
                              • intel-microcode: 20250127-1.xcpng8.3
                              • netdata: 1.47.5-4.1.xcpng8.3
                              • openssl: 1.0.2k-26.2.xcpng8.3
                              • qemu: 4.2.1-5.2.10.1.xcpng8.3
                              • r8125-module: 9.012.04-2.xcpng8.3
                              • sm: 3.2.3-1.17.xcpng8.3
                              • systemtap: 4.0-5.1.xcpng8.3
                              • xapi: 24.19.2-1.10.xcpng8.3
                              • xcp-emu-manager: 1.2.0-2.xcpng8.3
                              • xcp-ng-release: 8.3.0-29
                              • xcp-ng-xapi-plugins: 1.12.0-1.xcpng8.3
                              • xen: 4.17.5-4.2.xcpng8.3
                              • xo-lite: 0.8.0-1.xcpng8.3

                              Optional packages:

                              • Alternate drivers:
                                • atlantic-module-alt: 2.5.12-1.xcpng8.3

                              What to test

                              Normal use and anything else you want to test. The closer to your actual use of XCP-ng, the better.

                              Test window before official release of the updates

                              ~ 4/5 days

                              F abudefA P A 4 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                              • bleaderB Offline
                                bleader Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                last edited by

                                Home host updated successfully, no issue.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • F Offline
                                  flakpyro @gduperrey
                                  last edited by

                                  @gduperrey

                                  installed on 2 test machines

                                  Machine 1:
                                  Intel Xeon E-2336
                                  SuperMicro board.

                                  Machine 2:
                                  Minisforum MS-01
                                  i9-13900H
                                  32 GB Ram
                                  Using Intel X710 onboard NIC

                                  Both machines installed fine and all VMs came up without issue after.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • X Offline
                                    XCP-ng-JustGreat
                                    last edited by

                                    Latest test updates were applied to three-node home lab pool (3 x Dell OptiPlex SFF 7040 i7-6700/48GB RAM/256GB NVMe boot drive/TrueNAS Core 10Gbps-attached NFS shared storage) without incident. VMs appear to running normally, live migration between hosts works fine and no apparent problems so far.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • abudefA Offline
                                      abudef @gduperrey
                                      last edited by

                                      The update went fine and everything is working fine.

                                      @gduperrey said in XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing:

                                      xapi: Re-enabled nested virtualization in 8.3, with the same limitations as in 8.2.

                                      Since I keep bothering with nested virtualization here on the forum, I of course immediately tried the support in 8.3 🙂

                                      Setup:

                                      • HW XCP-ng 8.3
                                        • Nested XCP-ng 8.3
                                          • Windows Server 2025
                                          • Debian 12.9

                                      Windows installation on the nested hypervisor went ok and the system seems to be working fine.
                                      The problem occurred with Debian. ISO 12.9 netistall, UEFI was used. The system boots up and shows the notorious install screen: Graphic install, Install ... Regardless of the type of installation chosen, immediately after starting it, nested hypervisor XCP-ng 8.3 crashes and reboots. By the way, this problem with Debian is also on VMware - if I use nested XCP-ng 8.3 there, the Debian installation crashes it just the same.

                                      TeddyAstieT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • TeddyAstieT Offline
                                        TeddyAstie Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team Xen Guru @abudef
                                        last edited by TeddyAstie

                                        @abudef Note that even with this update, nested virtualization is still not really supported in XCP-ng 8.3.
                                        It's there, you can enable it at your own risk. It broke due to some change in XAPI (even though Xen hypervisor had "support" for it).
                                        It never actually got removed from Xen hypervisor (it was marked experimental in Xen 4.13 used in XCP-ng 8.2, it is also the case for Xen 4.17), although nothing really changed, it still has the same issues and limitations as said.

                                        The current state of nested virtualization in Xen is quite clumsy and there are future plans to remake it properly from ground without taking shortcuts and have proper tests to back it.

                                        Aside that, after some experiments, it seems that mostly nested EPT is incomplete/buggy, so your L1 hypervisor should not rely on it. You should add hap=0 to nested XCP-ng Xen cmdline. Beware that it will imply a pretty large performance hit, but I had more consistent results with this.
                                        I am quite suprised that Windows works while Linux don't, maybe it is somewhat related to PV drivers ?

                                        B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • P Online
                                          ph7 @gduperrey
                                          last edited by

                                          @gduperrey

                                          I updated my test host and all seems to work fine.
                                          But I have 1 question:
                                          Do I need to disable the testing repo or is it removed at the reboot?

                                          yum clean metadata --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing
                                          yum update --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing
                                          reboot

                                          [10:33 x1 ~]# yum repolist 
                                          Inlästa insticksmoduler: fastestmirror
                                          Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
                                          Excluding mirror: updates.xcp-ng.org
                                           * xcp-ng-base: mirrors.xcp-ng.org
                                          Excluding mirror: updates.xcp-ng.org
                                           * xcp-ng-updates: mirrors.xcp-ng.org
                                          förråds-id                                 förrådsnamn                                           status
                                          xcp-ng-base                                XCP-ng Base Repository                                4 376
                                          xcp-ng-updates                             XCP-ng Updates Repository                               125
                                          repolist: 4 501
                                          
                                          dthenotD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                          • dthenotD Offline
                                            dthenot Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @ph7
                                            last edited by

                                            @ph7 It's only enabled for the two yum command with the --enablerepo explicitly used.
                                            It's disabled in the config otherwise.
                                            No need to do anything 🙂

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                                            • First post
                                              Last post