XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Epyc VM to VM networking slow

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Compute
    206 Posts 23 Posters 101.2k Views 26 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • TeddyAstieT Offline
      TeddyAstie Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team Xen Guru
      last edited by TeddyAstie

      For those who have AMD EPYC 7003 (Zen 3 EPYCs), you may find in Processor settings in firmware

      • Enhanced REP MOVSB/STOSB (ERMS)
      • Fast Short REP MOVSB (FSRM)

      Which is apparently disabled by default.
      It could be interesting to enable them and see if it changes anything performance-wise. I am not sure if it's just for showing a flag, or if it changes anything in the CPU behavior though.

      You can also try REP-MOV/STOS Streaming to see it changes anything too.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D Offline
        dknight-bg @TeddyAstie
        last edited by

        @TeddyAstie

        I'm attaching results with Epyc 9004 / AS-1015CS-TNR-EU / MB: H13SSW

        user cpu family market v2v 1T v2v 4T h2v 1T h2v 4T notes
        dknight-bg EPYC 9354P Zen4 server 5.10 G (130/150/250) 6.24 G (131/254/348) 11.1 G (0/131/216) 11.1 G (0/187/302) Disabled: Enhanced REP MOVSB/STOSB (ERMS), Fast Short REP MOVSB (FSRM)
        dknight-bg EPYC 9354P Zen4 server 6.71 G (112/223/269) 7.11 G (122/261/342) 11.3 G (0/145/190) 11.5G (0/179/282) Enabled: Enhanced REP MOVSB/STOSB (ERMS), Fast Short REP MOVSB (FSRM)

        I couldn't find a setting for REP-MOV/STOPS Streaming in the BIOS, nor in the MB manual.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • olivierlambertO Offline
          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
          last edited by

          In VM to VM it's already a "free" +30% perf for 1T, impressive. Also 14% for 4T, not bad.

          N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • N Offline
            nicols @olivierlambert
            last edited by nicols

            @olivierlambert yes, but this is only a small improvement to overall problem. Still, compared to similar intel platform, v2v network performance is very low. Are there any news for the final solution to this problem?

            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M Offline
              manilx @nicols
              last edited by

              @nicols We're on 2 HP's with AMD EPYC 7543P 32-Core and it is a pain.
              Had to deploy Intel server just for running the backups, which improved a lot (but that's stupid with 2 beasts of hosts)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • olivierlambertO Offline
                olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                last edited by

                No obvious solution yet, it's likely due to an architecture problem on AMD, because of CCDs and how CPUs are made. So the solution (if there's any) will be likely a sum of various small improvements to make it bearable.

                I'm going to Santa Clara to discuss that with AMD directly (among other things).

                M ForzaF 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • M Offline
                  manilx @olivierlambert
                  last edited by

                  @olivierlambert No more EPYC's here, that's for sure. In the future it'll be Intel again (even if they then belong to Broadcom and TMC :p)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • ForzaF Offline
                    Forza @olivierlambert
                    last edited by

                    @olivierlambert said in Epyc VM to VM networking slow:

                    No obvious solution yet, it's likely due to an architecture problem on AMD, because of CCDs and how CPUs are made. So the solution (if there's any) will be likely a sum of various small improvements to make it bearable.

                    I'm going to Santa Clara to discuss that with AMD directly (among other things).

                    Do we have other data to back this? The issue is not really common outside of Xen. I do hope some solution comes out from the meeting with AMD.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • olivierlambertO Offline
                      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                      last edited by

                      If we become partners officially, we'll be able to have more advanced accesses with their teams. I still have hope, it's just that the pace isn't on me.

                      D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • D Offline
                        Davidj 0 @olivierlambert
                        last edited by

                        @olivierlambert
                        Can we rule out extra_guest_irqs as the root cause of this problem?

                        https://docs.xcp-ng.org/compute/#nvme-storage-devices-on-linux

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • olivierlambertO Offline
                          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                          last edited by

                          It's probably completely unrelated, but feel free to test 🙂

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post