@florent I'm doing this from source.
Running git pull --rebase
seems to have fixed the build problems.
Best posts made by Davidj 0
-
RE: Our future backup code: test it!
-
RE: Recommended CPU & RAM for physical hypervisor node
@yzgulec
You might build your first pool using your existing rules (eg, pCPU:vCPU = 1:3). As business expands, you will gain experience that allows you to adjust your rules when building future pools. I would be interested in hearing what you find.Be sure to give the control domain (aka "dom0") enough RAM.
The hosts in a pool should all be the same - same CPU type, same number of cores, same amount of RAM, same number of network ports, and a consistent network design.
-
RE: Remove running host
@kassebasse said in Remove running host:
I am just trying to remove the host, because it is no longer exists
In that case, try
xe host-declare-dead
You will need the prior UUID of the host, that is, the UUID assigned to the host before you reinstalled xcp-ng.
xe host-list
will provide that.Read the warnings about host-declare-dead carefully.
-
RE: DevOps Megathread: what you need and how we can help!
The existing technical documentation is great. An operations guide would be helpful. Here are a couple of chapter ideas:
-
Best practices for setting up your environment
(eg, odd number of hosts, isolate management network, treat your hosts like cattle, etc) -
Preparing for disasters (eg, requirements for restoring pool metadata, how to recover a single VM if your pool data is gone, etc)
-
Latest posts made by Davidj 0
-
RE: Our future backup code: test it!
Testing a continuous replication backup, I get Error: can't connect to any nbd client
Running the same job on my regular XO works fine. Let me know what logs you want to see.
mail (h2) Snapshot Start: 2025-04-10 18:18 End: 2025-04-10 18:18 h3 local storage (130.02 GiB free) - h3 Start: 2025-04-10 18:18 Start: 2025-04-10 18:18 End: 2025-04-10 18:18 Duration: a few seconds Error: can't connect to any nbd client Type: delta
-
RE: Our future backup code: test it!
@florent I'm doing this from source.
Runninggit pull --rebase
seems to have fixed the build problems. -
RE: Our future backup code: test it!
I'm still getting "Cannot find module '@vates/generator-toolbox'" errors when I try to build it. I'm using the 'feat_generator_backups" branch.
-
Suggestion: Backup of VM with no disk should not fail with "Error: NO_HOSTS_AVAILABLE()"
I found this while investigating repeated backup failure reports. The error report says "NO_HOSTS_AVAILABLE()".
I finally noticed that the user had removed all of the disks from the VM.
Could the backup code be adjusted to ignore VMs that don't have disks, or to return a different error?
-
RE: XOA web deploy stuck at "Deploying XOA..." No error
@RawbDeeni
Can your XCP host ping xoa.io? -
RE: Using Multiple Servers in LDAP Plug-in
@kagbasi-ngc
First, a disclaimer. It's been a while since I last designed an HA solution for AD. Things may have improved.You should reconsider your approach to designing a highly availability AD. Configuring the client to guess which AD server to use will work fine, but only as long as both AD servers are healthy. If there is ever a problem between them, you will have no control over which AD the servers hit.
If I remember correctly, best practice for highly available Active Directory is either to use Microsoft's AD VIP solution, or to use round-robin DNS (multiple records with the same name but different IP addresses). Either way, all of the clients in a single domain should have the same configuration.
-
RE: Recommended CPU & RAM for physical hypervisor node
@yzgulec
You might build your first pool using your existing rules (eg, pCPU:vCPU = 1:3). As business expands, you will gain experience that allows you to adjust your rules when building future pools. I would be interested in hearing what you find.Be sure to give the control domain (aka "dom0") enough RAM.
The hosts in a pool should all be the same - same CPU type, same number of cores, same amount of RAM, same number of network ports, and a consistent network design.
-
RE: Enhancement suggestion: Filter showing VMs that don't have the agent installed
@julien-f said in Enhancement suggestion: Filter showing VMs that don't have the agent installed:
XO does not support this for halted VMs but that could be added indeed.
Can you change the title of my thread to "Enhancement suggestion: Update 'ManagementAgentDetected?' to support halted VMs" ?
-
Enhancement suggestion: Filter showing VMs that don't have the agent installed
A filter that only lists VMs that need the agent installed would be very helpful. Here are a few thoughts.
-
The "has agent" mark should persist after VM shutdown. Can we use tags, or should we look for an alternative?
-
VMs that have the agent running should be marked as having the agent. Can we update the agent so that it add the tag itself at startup?
-
XO should remove the marker from any VMs that have been running for more than 5 minutes and do not have the agent running.
With this setup, it is easy to determine which VMs need the agent, including VMs that are shut down at the moment.
-
-
RE: Failure to Boot
@davealex8
Any hardware changes to your server, or on your network?What's your setup?
- How many servers?
- What type of CPU?
- Where is your VM storage (in the server, on an NAS, on iSCSI)?
Go slowly, take the time to make a plan, and you're more likely to recover.
-David