XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Manual snapshots retention

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Management
    45 Posts 5 Posters 637 Views 4 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Tristis OrisT Offline
      Tristis Oris Top contributor @olivierlambert
      last edited by

      @olivierlambert but on vm page it works as should.
      7a8f6642-2549-4486-8e89-21c3cf857b27-ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅.png

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M Offline
        manilx @olivierlambert
        last edited by manilx

        @olivierlambert Now I know that there is no risk πŸ˜‰ BUT it got me scared definitely. And probably will others.

        Also it's just a changing of a string so it should be easy.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • olivierlambertO Offline
          olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
          last edited by

          Not necessarily that easy, especially on a "legacy" code base, I truly wonder if we should invest some time on this instead of XO 6?

          M Tristis OrisT 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M Offline
            manilx @olivierlambert
            last edited by

            @olivierlambert Your call Β―_(ツ)_/Β― πŸ˜‰

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Tristis OrisT Offline
              Tristis Oris Top contributor @olivierlambert
              last edited by

              @olivierlambert release this year? (c)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • olivierlambertO Offline
                olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                last edited by olivierlambert

                I don't understand the question πŸ€” XO 6 is already here and takes 90% of our XO front team load. Anything on XO 5 will slow down the number of features available in XO 6.

                Tristis OrisT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Tristis OrisT Offline
                  Tristis Oris Top contributor @olivierlambert
                  last edited by

                  @olivierlambert we are waiting for release)

                  at least it needs to be fixed in xo6.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • olivierlambertO Offline
                    olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                    last edited by olivierlambert

                    Waiting for what? Just add /v6 to access XO 6. The "release" is just having XO 6 by default, but it's not like "now it's available". It is already the case.

                    For XO 6, since it will be very different, you won't have exactly the same way of doing things than XO 5, but yes, it should be better in any way πŸ™‚

                    M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M Offline
                      manilx @olivierlambert
                      last edited by

                      @olivierlambert This feature was added not long ago anyway. Pity the text was put in this way.... The "concern" that it might scare others (did us) is valid as 99% use XO5 today.
                      So, perhaps you might save on support calls? My 2 cents anyway

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • olivierlambertO Offline
                        olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                        last edited by olivierlambert

                        I will let XO PO to decide about this. Pinging @lsouai-vates

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • First post
                          Last post