DevOps Megathread: what you need and how we can help!

Jonathon

@andrewperry I myself migrated our rancher management cluster from the original rke to a new rke2 cluster using this plan not too long ago, so you should not have much trouble. Feel free to ask questions

Tristis Oris

i found time to play with cloud init, most of examples looks outdated or don't work dunno why.

hostname: {name} don't work, only hostname: {name}%. Also i don't find that macros at official doc.

with manage_etc_hosts: true it changed /etc/hosts 127.0.1.1 basename to 127.0.1.1 basename test%. Maybe package itself bug, maybe XO problem.

preserve_hostname: false looks not required, i don't see any difference.

even if not use any network config, it change netplan (don't need it with dhcp).

network:
  version: 2
  ethernets:
    enX0:
      dhcp4: true

to

network:
  version: 2
  ethernets:
    enX0:
      match:
        macaddress: "my_mac"
      dhcp4: true
      dhcp6: true
      set-name: "enX0"

to save default netplan, need to use something like

network:
  version: 1
  config:
      subnets:
      - type: dhcp4
      type: physical

can't make disk resize work, it looks like rocket science. And this is most important part for me.

resize_rootfs: true
growpart:
  mode: auto
  devices: ['/']
  ignore_growroot_disabled: false

I'm fine enough with manually tuned templates, 99% time don't need to change anything except name\disk. Other tasks require manual attention anyway or already covered with ansible. Would be nice to see tutorial for IQ<3.

nathanael-h

@Tristis-Oris
Hello, thanks for the report. I will try to fix and improve things, but before I have a few questions.

What is the template you are using? Is it one from XOA Hub?
Where did you found the cloud-init config snippets?

For your information, the defaults cloud-init configs snippets come from here: https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/blob/master/packages/xo-web/src/common/cloud-config.js#L78-L88

For growpart it depends of the template used. Last time I tested it was working with a Debian 12 template from the XOA Hub.

Tristis Oris

@nathanael-h

my custom template.
forum, cloud-init doc.

Cyrille

Pulumi Xen Orchestra Provider - Release v2.0.0

We released a new version of the Pulumi Xen Orchestra provider.

You can fail more information about the release here : https://xcp-ng.org/forum/post/92858

nathanael-h

xo-powershell moves from alpha to beta

The XO-PowerShell module is published in the :microsoft: PowerShell Gallery as v1.0.0-beta

https://www.powershellgallery.com/packages/xo-powershell/1.0.0-beta

Grab it with one powershell command:

Install-Module -Name xo-powershell -AllowPrerelease

Doc here

Thanks to @dinhngtu @iButcat

Cyrille

Hello there,

We release a new version Terraform provider with improvements of the VM disk lifecycle!

Now you can expand a VM disk with Terraform without data loss.

Read the release note: https://github.com/vatesfr/terraform-provider-xenorchestra/releases/tag/v0.32.0

nathanael-h

Hello
We published a new blog post about our Kubernetes recipe:
You'll find there

A step by step guide to create a production ready Kubernetes cluster, on top of your servers, in minutes!
Some architecture insights

https://xen-orchestra.com/blog/virtops-6-create-a-kubernetes-cluster-in-minutes/

Thanks to @Cyrille

Cyrille

Xen Orchestra Cloud Controller Manager in development

Hello everyone

We publish a development version of a Xen Orchestra Cloud Controller Manager!

It support the controllers cloud-node and cloud-node-lifecycle and add labels to your Kubernetes nodes hosted on Xen Orchestra VMs.

apiVersion: v1
kind: Node
metadata:
  labels:
    # Type generated base on CPU and RAM
    node.kubernetes.io/instance-type: 2VCPU-1GB
    # Xen Orchestra Pool ID of the node VM Host
    topology.kubernetes.io/region: 3679fe1a-d058-4055-b800-d30e1bd2af48
    # Xen Orchestra ID of the node VM Host
    topology.kubernetes.io/zone: 3d6764fe-dc88-42bf-9147-c87d54a73f21
    # Additional labels based on Xen Orchestra data (beta)
    topology.k8s.xenorchestra/host_id: 3d6764fe-dc88-42bf-9147-c87d54a73f21
    topology.k8s.xenorchestra/pool_id: 3679fe1a-d058-4055-b800-d30e1bd2af48
    vm.k8s.xenorchestra/name_label: cgn-microk8s-recipe---Control-Plane
    ...
  name: worker-1
spec:
  ...
  # providerID - magic string:
  #   xeorchestra://{Pool ID}/{VM ID}
  providerID: xeorchestra://3679fe1a-d058-4055-b800-d30e1bd2af48/8f0d32f8-3ce5-487f-9793-431bab66c115

For now, we have only tested the provider with Microk8s.

What's next?

We will test the CCM with other types of Kubernetes clusters and work on fixing known issues.
Also a modification of the XOA Hub recipe will come to include the CCM.
More label will be added (Pool Name, VM Name, etc.).

Feedback is welcome!

You can install and test the XO CCM, and provide feedback to help improve and speed up the release of the first stable version. This is greatly appreciated

The XO CCM repository
Installation doc

Cyrille

Pulumi Xen Orchestra Provider - Release v2.1.0

This new version brings improvement on the VM disks lifecycle made on the Terraform Provider.

https://github.com/vatesfr/pulumi-xenorchestra/releases/tag/v2.1.0

afk

Hi, I'm currently testing deployments with pulumi using packer templates.

So far the basics work as expected but I'm stuck on a setting issue that seems to affect both pulumi and terraform providers. As far as I know there is no way to set the memory as static or changing memory_min when creating a VM from a template.

The template was created with 1cpu and 2GB of RAM

Screenshot 2025-07-15 at 11.56.01.png

The VM created from this template using pulumi was assigned 2cpus and 4GB of RAM, however this only sets memory_max

Screenshot 2025-07-15 at 11.56.21.png

I found the following post that talks about this: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/5628/xenorchestra-with-terraform

and also the folllowing github issue https://github.com/vatesfr/terraform-provider-xenorchestra/issues/211

Manually setting the memory limits after VM creation defeats the purpose of automation. I suppose that implementing those settings in the relevant providers is a core feature. In most cases, VMs need static memory limits.

In the meantime, is there any workaround that I should investigate or anything that I missed ?

slax81 created this issue in vatesfr/terraform-provider-xenorchestra