XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Potential bug with Windows VM backup: "Body Timeout Error"

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
    35 Posts 7 Posters 3.0k Views 7 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • nikadeN Offline
      nikade Top contributor @MajorP93
      last edited by

      @MajorP93 im seeing this as well, I think the issue is related to communication between XO and XCP-NG.
      I noticed that it doesn't seem to depend on the vdi size in our case, but rather latency between XO and XCP-NG, which are on different sites and connected via IPSEC VPN.

      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M Offline
        MajorP93 @nikade
        last edited by MajorP93

        @nikade Hmm I have a hard time understanding what might cause this issue in my case since all of our 5 XCP-ng hosts are on the same site. They can talk on layer 2 with each other and have 2x 50 Gbit/s LACP bond each...
        The XO VM is running on the pool master itself.
        Some of the VMs that threw this error are also even running on the pool master itself.
        So I would expect that the traffic does not even have to exit the physical host in this case...
        Latency should be perfectly fine in this case...

        All XCP-ng hosts, XO VM and NAS (backup remote) can ping each other at below 1ms latency...

        Really weird.

        If anyone has an idea regarding what could possibly cause this I would be grateful.
        As I said before I want to test Gzip instead of Zstd but I have to wait until this backup job finished.
        It has ~40TB of data to backup in total 😅

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • olivierlambertO Offline
          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
          last edited by

          I think we have a lead, I've seen a discussion between @florent and @dinhngtu recently about that topic

          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • M Offline
            MajorP93 @olivierlambert
            last edited by

            @olivierlambert said in Potential bug with Windows VM backup: "Body Timeout Error":

            I think we have a lead, I've seen a discussion between @florent and @dinhngtu recently about that topic

            Sounds good!
            So there is a fix currently being worked on?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • olivierlambertO Offline
              olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
              last edited by

              I think we have a lead to explore, we'll keep you posted when we have a branch to test 🙂

              M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • M Offline
                MajorP93 @olivierlambert
                last edited by

                @olivierlambert said in Potential bug with Windows VM backup: "Body Timeout Error":

                I think we have a lead to explore, we'll keep you posted when we have a branch to test 🙂

                Sure! Thank you very much.
                When there is a branch available I will be happy to compile, test and provide any information / log needed.

                M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M Offline
                  MajorP93 @MajorP93
                  last edited by MajorP93

                  I did 2 more tests.

                  1. using full backup with encryption disabled on the remote (had it enabled before) --> same issue
                  2. switching from zstd to gzip --> same issue
                  M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M Offline
                    MajorP93 @MajorP93
                    last edited by MajorP93

                    Hey, I did some more digging.
                    I found some log entries that were written at the moment the backup job threw the "body timeout error". (Those blocks of log entries appear for all VMs that show this problem).

                    grep -i "VM.export" xensource.log | grep -i "error"

                    Nov  4 08:02:33 dat-xcpng01 xapi: [error||141766 HTTPS 192.168.60.30->:::80|[XO] VM export R:edfb08f9b55b|xapi_compression] nice failed to compress: exit code 70
                    Nov  4 08:02:33 dat-xcpng01 xapi: [error||141766 :::80|VM.export D:6f2ee2bc66b8|backtrace] [XO] VM export R:edfb08f9b55b failed with exception Server_error(CLIENT_ERROR, [ INTERNAL_ERROR: [ Unix.Unix_error(Unix.EPIPE, "write", "") ] ])
                    Nov  4 08:02:33 dat-xcpng01 xapi: [error||141766 :::80|VM.export D:6f2ee2bc66b8|backtrace] Raised Server_error(CLIENT_ERROR, [ INTERNAL_ERROR: [ Unix.Unix_error(Unix.EPIPE, "write", "") ] ])
                    Nov  4 08:02:33 dat-xcpng01 xapi: [error||141766 :::80|VM.export D:6f2ee2bc66b8|backtrace] 1/16 xapi Raised at file ocaml/xapi/stream_vdi.ml, line 127
                    Nov  4 08:02:33 dat-xcpng01 xapi: [error||141766 :::80|VM.export D:6f2ee2bc66b8|backtrace] 2/16 xapi Called from file ocaml/xapi/stream_vdi.ml, line 307
                    Nov  4 08:02:33 dat-xcpng01 xapi: [error||141766 :::80|VM.export D:6f2ee2bc66b8|backtrace] 3/16 xapi Called from file ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-pervasives/pervasiveext.ml, line 24
                    Nov  4 08:02:33 dat-xcpng01 xapi: [error||141766 :::80|VM.export D:6f2ee2bc66b8|backtrace] 4/16 xapi Called from file ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-pervasives/pervasiveext.ml, line 39
                    Nov  4 08:02:33 dat-xcpng01 xapi: [error||141766 :::80|VM.export D:6f2ee2bc66b8|backtrace] 5/16 xapi Called from file ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-pervasives/pervasiveext.ml, line 24
                    Nov  4 08:02:33 dat-xcpng01 xapi: [error||141766 :::80|VM.export D:6f2ee2bc66b8|backtrace] 6/16 xapi Called from file ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-pervasives/pervasiveext.ml, line 39
                    Nov  4 08:02:33 dat-xcpng01 xapi: [error||141766 :::80|VM.export D:6f2ee2bc66b8|backtrace] 7/16 xapi Called from file ocaml/xapi/stream_vdi.ml, line 263
                    Nov  4 08:02:33 dat-xcpng01 xapi: [error||141766 :::80|VM.export D:6f2ee2bc66b8|backtrace] 8/16 xapi Called from file list.ml, line 110
                    Nov  4 08:02:33 dat-xcpng01 xapi: [error||141766 :::80|VM.export D:6f2ee2bc66b8|backtrace] 9/16 xapi Called from file ocaml/xapi/export.ml, line 707
                    Nov  4 08:02:33 dat-xcpng01 xapi: [error||141766 :::80|VM.export D:6f2ee2bc66b8|backtrace] 10/16 xapi Called from file ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-pervasives/pervasiveext.ml, line 24
                    Nov  4 08:02:33 dat-xcpng01 xapi: [error||141766 :::80|VM.export D:6f2ee2bc66b8|backtrace] 11/16 xapi Called from file ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-pervasives/pervasiveext.ml, line 39
                    Nov  4 08:02:33 dat-xcpng01 xapi: [error||141766 :::80|VM.export D:6f2ee2bc66b8|backtrace] 12/16 xapi Called from file ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-pervasives/pervasiveext.ml, line 24
                    Nov  4 08:02:33 dat-xcpng01 xapi: [error||141766 :::80|VM.export D:6f2ee2bc66b8|backtrace] 13/16 xapi Called from file ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-pervasives/pervasiveext.ml, line 39
                    Nov  4 08:02:33 dat-xcpng01 xapi: [error||141766 :::80|VM.export D:6f2ee2bc66b8|backtrace] 14/16 xapi Called from file ocaml/xapi/server_helpers.ml, line 75
                    Nov  4 08:02:33 dat-xcpng01 xapi: [error||141766 :::80|VM.export D:6f2ee2bc66b8|backtrace] 15/16 xapi Called from file ocaml/xapi/server_helpers.ml, line 97
                    Nov  4 08:02:33 dat-xcpng01 xapi: [error||141766 :::80|VM.export D:6f2ee2bc66b8|backtrace] 16/16 xapi Called from file ocaml/libs/log/debug.ml, line 250
                    Nov  4 08:02:33 dat-xcpng01 xapi: [error||141766 :::80|VM.export D:6f2ee2bc66b8|backtrace]
                    Nov  4 08:02:33 dat-xcpng01 xapi: [error||141766 :::80|handler:http/get_export D:b71f8095b88f|backtrace] VM.export D:6f2ee2bc66b8 failed with exception Server_error(CLIENT_ERROR, [ INTERNAL_ERROR: [ Unix.Unix_error(Unix.EPIPE, "write", "") ] ])
                    
                    

                    daemon.log shows:

                    Nov  4 08:02:31 dat-xcpng01 forkexecd: [error||0 ||forkexecd] 135416 (/bin/nice -n 19 /usr/bin/ionice -c 3 /usr/bin/zstd) exited with code 70
                    

                    Maybe this gives some insights 🤔
                    To me it appears that the issue is caused by the compression (I had zstd enabled during the backup run).

                    Best regards

                    //EDIT: This is what ChatGPT thinks about this (I know AI responses have to be taken with a grain of salt):
                    Why would there be long “no data” gaps? With full exports, XAPI compresses on the host side. When it encounters very large runs of zeros / sparse/unused regions, compression may yield almost nothing for long stretches. If the stream goes quiet longer than Undici’s bodyTimeout (default ~5 minutes), XO aborts. This explains why it only hits some big VMs and why delta (NBD) backups are fine.

                    olivierlambertO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • olivierlambertO Offline
                      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO @MajorP93
                      last edited by

                      @MajorP93 said in Potential bug with Windows VM backup: "Body Timeout Error":

                      Why would there be long “no data” gaps? With full exports, XAPI compresses on the host side. When it encounters very large runs of zeros / sparse/unused regions, compression may yield almost nothing for long stretches. If the stream goes quiet longer than Undici’s bodyTimeout (default ~5 minutes), XO aborts. This explains why it only hits some big VMs and why delta (NBD) backups are fine.

                      I think that's exactly the issue in here (if I remember our internal discussion).

                      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • M Offline
                        MajorP93 @olivierlambert
                        last edited by

                        @olivierlambert said in Potential bug with Windows VM backup: "Body Timeout Error":

                        @MajorP93 said in Potential bug with Windows VM backup: "Body Timeout Error":

                        Why would there be long “no data” gaps? With full exports, XAPI compresses on the host side. When it encounters very large runs of zeros / sparse/unused regions, compression may yield almost nothing for long stretches. If the stream goes quiet longer than Undici’s bodyTimeout (default ~5 minutes), XO aborts. This explains why it only hits some big VMs and why delta (NBD) backups are fine.

                        I think that's exactly the issue in here (if I remember our internal discussion).

                        Do you think it could be a good idea to make the timeout configurable via Xen Orchestra?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • olivierlambertO Offline
                          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                          last edited by

                          I can't answer for my devs, just let them come here to provide an answer 🙂

                          G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • G Offline
                            Greg_E @olivierlambert
                            last edited by

                            @olivierlambert

                            Going back up to the top of the thread, removing compression was what fixed this for me, and my backups are still saying they are successful (maybe I better check).

                            I wish there was an easier way to "right size" the storage on these Windows VMs, the suggestion is to copy the VM to a new and smaller "disk" but I haven't looked into what is involved to get this done.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • olivierlambertO Offline
                              olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                              last edited by

                              We will fix it with compression, now we are pretty sure to know where the issue is 🙂

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • nikadeN Offline
                                nikade Top contributor
                                last edited by

                                Happy to hear that there's a potential lead, im also happy I found this thread so I can kick back and wait for Vates to fix it 😉

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • M Offline
                                  MajorP93
                                  last edited by MajorP93

                                  I can imagine that a fix could be to send "keepalive" packets in addition to the XCP-ng export-VM-data-stream so that the timeout on XO side does not occur 🤔

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • M Offline
                                    MajorP93
                                    last edited by

                                    I worked around this issue by changing my full backup job to "delta backup" and enabling "force full backup" in the schedule options.

                                    Delta backup seems more reliable as of now.

                                    Looking forward to a fix as Zstd compression is an appealing feature of the full backup method.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • First post
                                      Last post