XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    New project - XenAdminQt - a cross-platform GNU/Linux, macOS, Windows native thick client

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    24 Posts 6 Posters 1.9k Views 10 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Tristis OrisT Offline
      Tristis Oris Top contributor @benapetr
      last edited by

      @benapetr said in New project - XenAdminQt - a cross-platform GNU/Linux, macOS, Windows native thick client:

      you can already hide the templates using View menu (just uncheck you want to display them, they will disappear).

      What is the criterion for custom templates?

      7eb0ec2d-1968-471f-a4ad-d137ea36e05d-изображение.png

      by default, the usual templates are disabled, but I see them. Disabling custom ones disables all templates.

      B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • B Offline
        benapetr @Tristis Oris
        last edited by benapetr

        @Tristis-Oris the logic was directly ported over from C# version, so it does the same stuff what it filters there. It just toggles this search scope:

        QueryScope* TreeSearch::GetTreeSearchScope()
        {
            ObjectTypes types = Search::DefaultObjectTypes();
            types |= ObjectTypes::Pool;
        
            SettingsManager& settings = SettingsManager::instance();
        
            if (settings.getDefaultTemplatesVisible())
                types |= ObjectTypes::DefaultTemplate;
        
            if (settings.getUserTemplatesVisible()) // these are custom
                types |= ObjectTypes::UserTemplate;
        
            if (settings.getLocalSRsVisible())
                types |= ObjectTypes::LocalSR;
        
            return new QueryScope(types);
        }
        

        I assume it matches all user-defined templates, the defaults you see are "system defined" and part of xcp-ng .rpm packages. It's possible that this logic just wasn't ported correctly, I will look into it.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • B Offline
          benapetr @Tristis Oris
          last edited by

          @Tristis-Oris just FYI I fixed all of those issues you had, also regarding portable stuff - I implemented CLI switch -c <path> where you can specify directory where you want to store config, so you can wrap the app in a .bat or .sh script that would start it to use local storage (like flash drive) for config files, that should achieve portability.

          If you expected something more sophisticated let me know

          Tristis OrisT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Tristis OrisT Offline
            Tristis Oris Top contributor @benapetr
            last edited by

            @benapetr Nice, great.
            How about to implement a launch of CR backup VMs?

            https://xcp-ng.org/forum/assets/uploads/files/1769679350079-677dfcbb-211b-452f-ad8f-db59e2860579-изображение.png
            https://xcp-ng.org/forum/assets/uploads/files/1769679584572-3e39d799-a2fd-4cb0-8e2e-6b9c4312a2e6-изображение.png

            B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • B Offline
              benapetr @Tristis Oris
              last edited by

              @Tristis-Oris There are many features missing since it's alpha now, but you can open bug tracker request on github if you want to keep track of progress for this particular feature.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • TeddyAstieT Offline
                TeddyAstie Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team Xen Guru
                last edited by

                @benapetr
                Consider making a PR to https://github.com/xcp-ng/xcp-ng-org (https://github.com/xcp-ng/xcp-ng-org/blob/master/docs/management/management.md) if you want to make your project more visible.

                B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B Offline
                  benapetr @TeddyAstie
                  last edited by

                  @TeddyAstie good idea, thanks, I will do it once I get close to releasing first non-alpha version, right now it's still too immature for production use (although latest master version is so good and stable I already use it to manage most of my own clusters)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • olivierlambertO Online
                    olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                    last edited by

                    Note we already gave visibility on this project twice, with the last 2 XO blog post release and newsletter 🙂

                    B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • B Offline
                      benapetr @olivierlambert
                      last edited by

                      @olivierlambert ok that's great, I didn't even notice, thanks!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • B Offline
                        benapetr
                        last edited by

                        I just released 0.0.4! Still an alpha, but it's becoming pretty usable - there was over 60 commits of code cleanup, polish and also limited testing of all visible features - pretty much everything that is now visible in the UI should be operational at this point, option pages, properties of hosts, pools, VDIs, configuration of NICs, even bonding and advanced stuff like pool password / secret rotation. All XAPI actions and commands were already ported over from C# variant, so my focus now is only on finishing it into a final usable product.

                        We also have some features that original client doesn't have (such as XenCache explorer)!

                        Next on my to-do is to add all features that are currently missing completely: HA, GPU, PCIe, VM import / export etc.

                        Note: I will not be porting over any licensed or proprietary Citrix stuff. This tool may work with XenServer just fine, but I will not be porting over any of the proprietary features, because I will never use it and I have no way to test it either.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • First post
                          Last post