XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    [DEPRECATED] SMAPIv3 - Feedback & Bug reports

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
    75 Posts 20 Posters 54.4k Views 19 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • R Offline
      r1 XCP-ng Team @Marc.pezin
      last edited by

      @Marc-pezin Thanks. I'd suggest to also add # xe-toolstack-restart so that Error code: MISSING_URI does not show up πŸ‘

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • R Offline
        r1 XCP-ng Team
        last edited by

        @ronan-a is VDI move from SMAPIv1 to SMAPIv3 supported?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • olivierlambertO Offline
          olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
          last edited by

          Nope. I don't know if it's even planned by Citrix.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C Offline
            cg @olivierlambert
            last edited by

            @olivierlambert said in SMAPIv3 - Feedback & Bug reports:

            raw means any "whole" block device, meaning no snapshot, clone, no shared SR case, etc. Doesn't matter what's underneath. I would say the first use case is passing a whole drive to a VM (eg FreeNAS).

            But yeah, you would be able to pass a LUN if you like πŸ™‚

            Sounds a bit like VVOLs from VMware. Not sure how exactly they work but LUNs exclusively for VMs could be an easy thing, regarding TRIM/DISCARD etc.

            It just still needs mechanics for XAPI etc. to grab/backup them. Also Snapshots could be done with that, just a different logic.

            But first it's probably a target for people needing pure performance.

            @olivierlambert said in SMAPIv3 - Feedback & Bug reports:

            Nope. I don't know if it's even planned by Citrix.

            Noone noes if Citrix has plans at all - not even paying customers. Their communication is kind of a nightmare.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • olivierlambertO Offline
              olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
              last edited by

              Eager to see CH 8.1 and what they did to improve their driver to support storage live migration πŸ™‚

              C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C Offline
                cg @olivierlambert
                last edited by

                @olivierlambert said in SMAPIv3 - Feedback & Bug reports:

                Eager to see CH 8.1 and what they did to improve their driver to support storage live migration πŸ™‚

                Any idea about the release date? I mean their "one release a quater" only worked for very short and they failed again with 8.1, which should have been released until 1st of October.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • olivierlambertO Offline
                  olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                  last edited by

                  I think we can reasonably imagine for the end of the year or so πŸ™‚

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • C Offline
                    cg
                    last edited by

                    Then 8.1 should be the new LTSR. I'd appreciate that. Will XCP-ng follow that concept?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • olivierlambertO Offline
                      olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                      last edited by

                      Why do you think it will be the next LTSR?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C Offline
                        cg
                        last edited by

                        IIRC they said this year should bring another LTSR - as the old one becomes quite old now. The last chance would be a release in Q4 - that would also fit for 7.1 LTSR -> 8.1 LTSR (basically making 8.0 evolutions mature/tested)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • olivierlambertO Offline
                          olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                          last edited by

                          Do you remember where you read this?

                          A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • A Offline
                            AllooTikeeChaat @olivierlambert
                            last edited by

                            @olivierlambert

                            Citrix, have recently announced via blog post that the next reported XenApp/XenDesktop LTSR release is due end Q4 2019 so its possible CH8.1 might show up at the same time.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • olivierlambertO Offline
                              olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                              last edited by

                              Damn I probably missed that post, can you put the URL here please?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • C Offline
                                cg
                                last edited by

                                They removed the Hypervisor tag from their blog, so finding that posts isn't easy anmore and CH/XS posts get lost in stuff I don't care about.

                                Looks a bit like they only want to keep it because VMware Horizon becomes more attractive, if Citrix doesn't bring it's own HV for XenApp/XenDesktop for free.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • olivierlambertO Offline
                                  olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                                  last edited by

                                  Citrix want to keep their HV/platform because they don't want to rely only on competitors to run XenApp/XenDesktop. It's just not a "product" but a technical part of their solution.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • olivierlambertO Offline
                                    olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                                    last edited by

                                    I can't find anything on this blog πŸ˜•

                                    A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • A Offline
                                      AllooTikeeChaat @olivierlambert
                                      last edited by

                                      @olivierlambert

                                      Its all about XA/XD I'm afraid but it does state year end 2019 for the next LTSR.

                                      https://www.citrix.com/blogs/2019/09/19/whats-new-with-citrix-virtual-apps-and-desktops-september-2019/

                                      "Long-Term Service Release News

                                      For those of you on 7.15 LTSR β€” one of our most popular releases β€” we have some exciting news about our next LTSR availability. We’re planning our next LTSR for year-end."

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • C Offline
                                        cg
                                        last edited by

                                        Somewhere they said they want to algin numbers and XA/XD LTRS only makes sense on a fitting CH LTSR.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • olivierlambertO Offline
                                          olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                                          last edited by

                                          Hmm okay so it's not written directly. We'll see soon enough πŸ™‚

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • C Offline
                                            cocoon XCP-ng Center Team
                                            last edited by

                                            Hi, is the "raw-device-plugin" branch already working?
                                            https://github.com/xcp-ng/xcp-ng-xapi-storage/tree/feat/raw-device-plugin

                                            I just upgraded to 8.0 and wanted to try it now and found out, that the latest released package is v1.0.2 and is missing the raw-device.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                                            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                            With your input, this post could be even better πŸ’—

                                            Register Login
                                            • First post
                                              Last post