XCP-ng Center: Future
-
Thanks for the work, wouldn't it make more sense to name it "XCP-ng Center 20.01" ? Just my 2cents.
-
Thanks
-
@cobraAG hmm.. 20 can be everything... 2020 is more clearly a year
-
Thank you, Borzel for working on XCP-ng Center!
-
@borzel, many many thanks for work on XCP-ng Center!
Without XCP-ng Center, administering XCP-ng would be much more difficult and risky (error-prone) for me. -
@borzel: I second that! From time to time, I try to move over to XOA, but I always keep coming back to XCP-ng Center. XCP-ng Center supports my administrative tasks in a straight forward way (at least apart from backups
) and gives me all the information I need. Thank's for doing a great job! -
Thank you very much borzel. I am daily using XCP-ng Center to manage VM of 3 servers. I use XO for backup and migrate cases. Both are great tools. Thanks again for your time for providing and keep updating the release.
-
and here is the next nightly build
https://github.com/xcp-ng/xenadmin/releases/tag/99.99.99.28 Contains:
- all upstream changes from https://github.com/xenserver/xenadmin master
-
@borzel Thank you for all your work. XCP-ng Center is a tool I use most while XO is great for doing backups.
-
@gskger said in XCP-ng Center: Future:
@borzel: I second that! From time to time, I try to move over to XOA, but I always keep coming back to XCP-ng Center. XCP-ng Center supports my administrative tasks in a straight forward way (at least apart from backups
) and gives me all the information I need. Thank's for doing a great job!Same here. XO is good but doesn't give you the same sort of overview that you get from xcp-ng center. Everything is somewhat hidden away under its on set of sub menus.
-
Will XCP-NG Center ever support IPv6?
-
@Appollonius I don't think so, unless it's implemented upstream.
-
@borzel Sad, as it will be today's 'standard' and will apply even more the upcoming years.
-
@Appollonius @borzel They've been saying that it'll be relevant for 20 years, though.
-
This post is deleted!
