XCP-ng

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups

    XCP-ng Center: Future

    News
    14
    19
    1391
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • borzel
      borzel XCP-ng Center Team 🏚️ last edited by borzel

      Hello Community!

      I hope you all had a good start into year 2020!

      I decided to change the way I release XCP-ng Center due the lack of other people participating in development. In future I will only release builds based on the master branch of CITRIX XenCenter (https://github.com/xenserver/xenadmin).

      Pro:

      • fixes from CITRIX xenadmin (aka XenCenter) master branch will be faster present in our releases
      • only one upstream branch to merge from; reduces the hassle to merge/cherry pick from/to 3 different branches (like 7.6, 8.0, master).

      Contra:

      • hmm... maybe there is none 🙂

      Within this change the version schema will also change. I think I use the YEAR.MONTH schema, so the next release will be "XCP-ng Center 2020.01".

      The first step in this direction is the pre-relase of the current nightly build 99.99.99.27: https://github.com/xcp-ng/xenadmin/releases/tag/v99.99.99.27

      L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
      • K
        kevdog last edited by

        Hey thanks for working on XCP-ng Center -- I find it a really useful tool.

        Is this a README that describes how your project differs from XenCenter.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • M
          markhewitt1978 last edited by

          Excellent! XenCentre is still easier to use and provides visibility that XO doesn't so it's important to have.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A
            andit last edited by

            Thank you Borzel.. for me i still go back n forth beetween XO & xcp-ng center because i'm still newbie in xcp-ng. 😃

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • cobraAG
              cobraAG last edited by

              Thanks for the work, wouldn't it make more sense to name it "XCP-ng Center 20.01" ? Just my 2cents.

              borzel 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C
                cocoon XCP-ng Center Team 🏚️ last edited by

                Thanks 🙂

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • borzel
                  borzel XCP-ng Center Team 🏚️ @cobraAG last edited by

                  @cobraAG hmm.. 20 can be everything... 2020 is more clearly a year 😉

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • aqua-calc
                    aqua-calc last edited by aqua-calc

                    Thank you, Borzel for working on XCP-ng Center!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • MajorTom
                      MajorTom last edited by

                      @borzel, many many thanks for work on XCP-ng Center!
                      Without XCP-ng Center, administering XCP-ng would be much more difficult and risky (error-prone) for me.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • gskger
                        gskger Top contributor 💪 last edited by

                        @borzel: I second that! From time to time, I try to move over to XOA, but I always keep coming back to XCP-ng Center. XCP-ng Center supports my administrative tasks in a straight forward way (at least apart from backups 😇) and gives me all the information I need. Thank's for doing a great job!

                        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • onur
                          onur last edited by

                          Thank you very much borzel. I am daily using XCP-ng Center to manage VM of 3 servers. I use XO for backup and migrate cases. Both are great tools. Thanks again for your time for providing and keep updating the release.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • borzel
                            borzel XCP-ng Center Team 🏚️ last edited by

                            and here is the next nightly build

                            🎆 https://github.com/xcp-ng/xenadmin/releases/tag/99.99.99.28 🎆

                            Contains:

                            • all upstream changes from https://github.com/xenserver/xenadmin master
                            • ♥
                            S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                            • S
                              stevewest15 @borzel last edited by

                              @borzel Thank you for all your work. XCP-ng Center is a tool I use most while XO is great for doing backups.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • M
                                markhewitt1978 @gskger last edited by

                                @gskger said in XCP-ng Center: Future:

                                @borzel: I second that! From time to time, I try to move over to XOA, but I always keep coming back to XCP-ng Center. XCP-ng Center supports my administrative tasks in a straight forward way (at least apart from backups 😇) and gives me all the information I need. Thank's for doing a great job!

                                Same here. XO is good but doesn't give you the same sort of overview that you get from xcp-ng center. Everything is somewhat hidden away under its on set of sub menus.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • ?
                                  A Former User last edited by A Former User

                                  Will XCP-NG Center ever support IPv6? ⛏

                                  borzel 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • borzel
                                    borzel XCP-ng Center Team 🏚️ @Guest last edited by

                                    @Appollonius I don't think so, unless it's implemented upstream.

                                    ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • ?
                                      A Former User @borzel last edited by

                                      @borzel Sad, as it will be today's 'standard' and will apply even more the upcoming years.

                                      jtbw911 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • jtbw911
                                        jtbw911 @Guest last edited by

                                        @Appollonius @borzel They've been saying that it'll be relevant for 20 years, though. 😛

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • L
                                          Lentz @borzel last edited by

                                          This post is deleted!
                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • First post
                                            Last post