XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!

    News
    16
    63
    7941
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • onurO
      onur @olivierlambert
      last edited by

      @olivierlambert said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

      What do you mean? SR file system or root filesystem?

      The Local Storage for VM.
      ![alt text](Ek Açıklama 2020-02-28 124558.png image url)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stormiS
        stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team 🚀
        last edited by

        I don't think you should trust XCP-ng Center on this. What do you think @borzel?

        Check the output of mount instead.

        onurO borzelB 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • onurO
          onur @stormi
          last edited by

          here is the output. So I assume ext4 should be default when selecting EXT on the setup.

          @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

          I don't think you should trust XCP-ng Center on this. What do you think @borzel?

          Check the output of mount instead.

           mount
          sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime)
          proc on /proc type proc (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime)
          devtmpfs on /dev type devtmpfs (rw,nosuid,size=1270132k,nr_inodes=317533,mode=755)
          securityfs on /sys/kernel/security type securityfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime)
          tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev)
          devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,nosuid,noexec,relatime,gid=5,mode=620,ptmxmode=000)
          tmpfs on /run type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,mode=755)
          tmpfs on /sys/fs/cgroup type tmpfs (ro,nosuid,nodev,noexec,mode=755)
          cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,xattr,release_agent=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-cgroups-agent,name=systemd)
          pstore on /sys/fs/pstore type pstore (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime)
          cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu,cpuacct type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,cpu,cpuacct)
          cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/memory type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,memory)
          cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/net_cls,net_prio type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,net_cls,net_prio)
          cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,cpuset)
          cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/blkio type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,blkio)
          cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/devices type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,devices)
          cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/freezer type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,freezer)
          configfs on /sys/kernel/config type configfs (rw,relatime)
          
          /dev/sda1 on / type ext3 (rw,relatime)
          
          debugfs on /sys/kernel/debug type debugfs (rw,relatime)
          mqueue on /dev/mqueue type mqueue (rw,relatime)
          xenfs on /proc/xen type xenfs (rw,relatime)
          xenstore on /var/lib/xenstored type tmpfs (rw,relatime,mode=755)
          
          /dev/sda5 on /var/log type ext3 (rw,relatime)
          
          /dev/mapper/XSLocalEXT--3fe64d91--5349--ac86--d9b7--aa9dcf813cea-3fe64d91--5349--ac86--d9b7--aa9dcf813cea on /run/sr-mount/3fe64d91-5349-ac86-d9b7-aa9dcf813cea type ext4 (rw,relatime)
          
          tmpfs on /run/user/0 type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,size=256416k,mode=700)
          
          
          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stormiS
            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team 🚀
            last edited by

            @onur said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

            /dev/mapper/XSLocalEXT--3fe64d91--5349--ac86--d9b7--aa9dcf813cea-3fe64d91--5349--ac86--d9b7--aa9dcf813cea on /run/sr-mount/3fe64d91-5349-ac86-d9b7-aa9dcf813cea type ext4 (rw,relatime)

            It's ok, the SR is mounted as ext4 so this means it was created as ext4.

            onurO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • onurO
              onur @stormi
              last edited by

              @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

              @onur said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

              /dev/mapper/XSLocalEXT--3fe64d91--5349--ac86--d9b7--aa9dcf813cea-3fe64d91--5349--ac86--d9b7--aa9dcf813cea on /run/sr-mount/3fe64d91-5349-ac86-d9b7-aa9dcf813cea type ext4 (rw,relatime)

              It's ok, the SR is mounted as ext4 so this means it was created as ext4.

              great thank you very much @stormi . As you suspected, XCP-ng Center shows wrong format (I guess here is a bug for XCP-ng center devs)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stormiS
                stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team 🚀
                last edited by

                Please create an issue there: https://github.com/xcp-ng/xenadmin/issues

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • olivierlambertO
                  olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder🦸 CEO 🧑‍💼
                  last edited by

                  What's the info reported by xe sr-param-list uuid=<UUID OF THIS SR>?

                  onurO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • onurO
                    onur @olivierlambert
                    last edited by

                    @olivierlambert said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

                    What's the info reported by xe sr-param-list uuid=<UUID OF THIS SR>?

                    xe sr-param-list uuid=3fe64d91-5349-ac86-d9b7-aa9dcf813cea
                    uuid ( RO)                    : 3fe64d91-5349-ac86-d9b7-aa9dcf813cea
                                  name-label ( RW): ssd240Toshiba
                            name-description ( RW):
                                        host ( RO): OB1
                          allowed-operations (SRO): VDI.enable_cbt; VDI.list_changed_blocks; unplug; plug; PBD.create; VDI.disable_cbt; update; PBD.destroy; VDI.resize; VDI.clone; VDI.data_destroy; scan; VDI.snapshot; VDI.mirror; VDI.create; VDI.destroy; VDI.set_on_boot
                          current-operations (SRO):
                                        VDIs (SRO): 5da0c967-657f-43f2-8e4a-7cb80b7938ef; 2dd44491-b458-4119-a024-a48ace2a23e3; 05910aa1-8c5e-4af7-8ffc-11dbdcae5116; 60a7602d-ec61-4ef4-9db1-0f3fdbcd43f9
                                        PBDs (SRO): 96e685a7-f5cc-32fa-8289-b10e4a8ea4f5
                          virtual-allocation ( RO): 481036337152
                        physical-utilisation ( RO): 153255415808
                               physical-size ( RO): 192280748032
                                        type ( RO): ext
                                content-type ( RO): user
                                      shared ( RW): false
                               introduced-by ( RO): <not in database>
                                 is-tools-sr ( RO): false
                                other-config (MRW): i18n-original-value-name_label: Local storage; i18n-key: local-storage
                                   sm-config (MRO): devserial: scsi-3500080dc0133cdc2
                                       blobs ( RO):
                         local-cache-enabled ( RO): true
                                        tags (SRW):
                                   clustered ( RO): false
                    
                    
                    stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stormiS
                      stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team 🚀 @onur
                      last edited by

                      @onur said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

                      type ( RO): ext

                      As expected. The ext type has no information of the FS version in its name.

                      onurO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • onurO
                        onur @stormi
                        last edited by

                        @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

                        @onur said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

                        type ( RO): ext

                        As expected. The ext type has no information of the FS version in its name.
                        already created bug for XCP-ng center, but it looks like system is not reporting ext type

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • olivierlambertO
                          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder🦸 CEO 🧑‍💼
                          last edited by

                          Yes, it was just to be sure it's a XCP-ng Center issue 🙂 Now we are 100% sure.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • borzelB
                            borzel XCP-ng Center Team 🏚️ @stormi
                            last edited by borzel

                            @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

                            I don't think you should trust XCP-ng Center on this. What do you think @borzel?

                            Check the output of mount instead.

                            I think we should not trust 🙂 I assume the ext4 uses internally the same xapi-ID like the old ext.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stormiS
                              stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team 🚀
                              last edited by

                              A better label would just be "ext" so that it works both for ext3 and ext4.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • P
                                pnunn
                                last edited by

                                Running two hosts on the beta in my lab and so far have had no issues at all (touch wood). Looking forward to this hitting production.

                                P.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • olivierlambertO
                                  olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder🦸 CEO 🧑‍💼
                                  last edited by

                                  Thanks for the feedback!

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • C
                                    cnaumer
                                    last edited by

                                    Same here, a single host as well as two host pool are running fine so far. All upgraded via yum from 7.6.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • nikadeN
                                      nikade
                                      last edited by

                                      Did anyone try the performance of VM export/import yet?
                                      I am really excited to see the increase since this was one of the improvements mentioned by Citrix.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • P
                                        pnunn
                                        last edited by

                                        I've not imported full VM's but have imported a number of disks and they worked reasonably quickly I guess, although I have only very limited reference from another much more powerful setup to compare with.

                                        Peter.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • stormiS
                                          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team 🚀
                                          last edited by

                                          This thread is now dead, long live the 8.1 RC thread!

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • First post
                                            Last post