XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    63 Posts 16 Posters 33.6k Views 9 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • onurO Offline
      onur @stormi
      last edited by

      @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

      @onur said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

      type ( RO): ext

      As expected. The ext type has no information of the FS version in its name.
      already created bug for XCP-ng center, but it looks like system is not reporting ext type

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • olivierlambertO Offline
        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
        last edited by

        Yes, it was just to be sure it's a XCP-ng Center issue 🙂 Now we are 100% sure.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • borzelB Offline
          borzel XCP-ng Center Team @stormi
          last edited by borzel

          @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

          I don't think you should trust XCP-ng Center on this. What do you think @borzel?

          Check the output of mount instead.

          I think we should not trust 🙂 I assume the ext4 uses internally the same xapi-ID like the old ext.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stormiS Online
            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
            last edited by

            A better label would just be "ext" so that it works both for ext3 and ext4.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • P Offline
              pnunn
              last edited by

              Running two hosts on the beta in my lab and so far have had no issues at all (touch wood). Looking forward to this hitting production.

              P.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • olivierlambertO Offline
                olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                last edited by

                Thanks for the feedback!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C Offline
                  cnaumer
                  last edited by

                  Same here, a single host as well as two host pool are running fine so far. All upgraded via yum from 7.6.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • nikadeN Offline
                    nikade Top contributor
                    last edited by

                    Did anyone try the performance of VM export/import yet?
                    I am really excited to see the increase since this was one of the improvements mentioned by Citrix.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • P Offline
                      pnunn
                      last edited by

                      I've not imported full VM's but have imported a number of disks and they worked reasonably quickly I guess, although I have only very limited reference from another much more powerful setup to compare with.

                      Peter.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stormiS Online
                        stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                        last edited by

                        This thread is now dead, long live the 8.1 RC thread!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • First post
                          Last post