XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Kuberenets cluster recipe not happy

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    49 Posts 5 Posters 17.1k Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M Offline
      mathiashedberg @olivierlambert
      last edited by

      @olivierlambert
      The snapshot functionality is still quite tempting to use, as I have not had any issues with it before now. I'll admit I'm not too up to date on what features are recommended or not when it comes to XCP-NG.

      @DustinB I think its great that we have such useful software that is free and open source. If my comment came off as negative I apologize, that was not my intention.

      Moving forward I would assume that removing all my snapshots would remedy the issue. However I'm not too sure on how keen I am on doing that right at this moment with my current setup, maybe on a different test lab.

      BenjiReisB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • BenjiReisB Offline
        BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @mathiashedberg
        last edited by

        @mathiashedberg the snaphots might be indeed the problem.

        When looking for the template, the recipe looks for a VM with xo:resource:xva:id=<template uuid> in its other-config, a snapshot of the template VM would probably have this field se and it should not.

        Can you check if it's the case? and if the is-template field is true.

        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • olivierlambertO Offline
          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
          last edited by

          That's an interesting thing. I think it might be a potential bug because of XenCenter snapshot algorithm that handle is-template differently than XO.

          BenjiReisB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • BenjiReisB Offline
            BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @olivierlambert
            last edited by

            @olivierlambert should I also check that is-a-snapshot is false?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • olivierlambertO Offline
              olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
              last edited by

              Double check what do you have when we install a template from XO Hub. If is-a-snapshot is at false, then yes, add this condition. We should use the installed template, not anything else.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • BenjiReisB Offline
                BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                last edited by

                Okay so a fix is coming soon, i'll update here once released. 🙂

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M Offline
                  mathiashedberg @BenjiReis
                  last edited by mathiashedberg

                  @benjireis
                  So you are correct on all those points. Here are the relevant params from the snapshot that was being used:

                  is-a-template ( RW): true
                  is-a-snapshot ( RO): true
                  other-config (MRW): auto_poweron: false; xo:resource:xva:id: a677aa91-f5d5-46ec-bd53-956b73fc7871; xo:resource:namespace: Debian10; xo:resource:xva:version: 1.0.0; import_task: OpaqueRef:71bd99c2-11c3-4306-a5b9-7fe6e86f551b; mac_seed: 02166646-6e3b-de07-1b11-872d538d3f01; base_template_name: Debian Stretch 9.0; install-methods: cdrom,nfs,http,ftp; linux_template: true
                  
                  BenjiReisB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • BenjiReisB Offline
                    BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @mathiashedberg
                    last edited by

                    @mathiashedberg good to know.

                    So you can wait for the fix or remove the xo:resource:xva:id from the other_configs of the snapshots or remove the snapshots

                    M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M Offline
                      mathiashedberg @BenjiReis
                      last edited by

                      @benjireis Looks like version 5.56.0 runs as expected! No issues so far!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • olivierlambertO Offline
                        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                        last edited by

                        Thanks for the feedback @mathiashedberg !

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post