XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    RunX: tech preview

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    49 Posts 15 Posters 17.7k Views 15 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • olivierlambertO Offline
      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
      last edited by

      Hello!

      ronan-a will guide you if you have problems on making it work 🙂

      There's still some work needed to be a 100% feature complete product, in the meantime, if you want to go in production, go for the VM+container inside 🙂

      J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J Offline
        jmccoy555 @olivierlambert
        last edited by

        olivierlambert ok, if its still planned to be a feature then I'm up for playing.... testing!!

        ronan-a is this the best way to get the template? The rest of the instructions look pretty simple to follow so I don't think I've got them wrong..... 😄

        xe vm-install template=Debian\ Buster\ 10 new-name-label=tempforrunx sr-uuid=7c5212f3-97b2-cdeb-b735-ad26638926e3 --minimal
        this uuid is of the SR created by the step in the first post?

        xe vm-param-set uuid=a2d46568-c9ab-7da2-57cb-d213ee9d8dfa HVM-boot-policy=""
        uuid that is a result of the first step?

        xe vm-param-set uuid=a2d46568-c9ab-7da2-57cb-d213ee9d8dfa PV-args=""
        uuid that is a result of the first step?

        xe vm-param-set VCPUs-max=2 uuid=14d91f2f-a103-da0e-51b3-21c8db307e5d
        what is this uuid?

        xe vm-param-set VCPUs-at-startup=2 uuid=14d91f2f-a103-da0e-51b3-21c8db307e5d
        same again, where does this uuid come from?

        xe vm-disk-remove device=0 uuid=cb5a6d67-07d5-b5ea-358a-7ee0d6e535af
        and this one too?

        xe template-param-set is-a-template=true uuid=a2d46568-c9ab-7da2-57cb-d213ee9d8dfa
        uuid generated by the 1st step

        Thanks.

        ronan-aR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • ronan-aR Offline
          ronan-a Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @jmccoy555
          last edited by ronan-a

          jmccoy555 said in RunX: tech preview:

          this uuid is of the SR created by the step in the first post?

          Right!

          Regarding all xe vm-param-set/xe vm-disk-remove/xe template-param-set commands, you must use the VM UUID returned by the xe vm-install command. I edited the post regarding that. 😉

          J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • J Offline
            jmccoy555 @ronan-a
            last edited by

            ronan-a thanks (was obviously too late for me to think about trying that!!) but no luck 😞

            [18:36 bad-XCP-ng-Host-03 ~]# xe vm-install template=Debian\ Buster\ 10 new-name-label=RunX sr-uuid=cb817299-f3ee-9d4e-dd5d-9edad6e55ed0 --minimal
            b3b5efcf-e810-57ab-5482-4dba14dda0a6
            [18:37 bad-XCP-ng-Host-03 ~]# xe vm-param-set uuid=b3b5efcf-e810-57ab-5482-4dba14dda0a6 HVM-boot-policy=""
            [18:38 bad-XCP-ng-Host-03 ~]# xe vm-param-set uuid=b3b5efcf-e810-57ab-5482-4dba14dda0a6 PV-args=""
            [18:38 bad-XCP-ng-Host-03 ~]# xe vm-param-set uuid=b3b5efcf-e810-57ab-5482-4dba14dda0a6 VCPUs-max=2
            [18:38 bad-XCP-ng-Host-03 ~]# xe vm-param-set uuid=b3b5efcf-e810-57ab-5482-4dba14dda0a6 VCPUs-at-startup=2
            [18:39 bad-XCP-ng-Host-03 ~]# xe vm-disk-remove device=0 uuid=b3b5efcf-e810-57ab-5482-4dba14dda0a6
            [18:39 bad-XCP-ng-Host-03 ~]# xe template-param-set is-a-template=true uuid=b3b5efcf-e810-57ab-5482-4dba14dda0a6
            [18:41 bad-XCP-ng-Host-03 ~]# nano /etc/runx.conf
            [18:43 bad-XCP-ng-Host-03 ~]# podman container create --name archlinux archlinux
            0f72916b8cca6c7c4aa68e6ebee467c0480e29e22ebbd6ec666d8385826f88b8
            [18:43 bad-XCP-ng-Host-03 ~]# podman start archlinux
            The server failed to handle your request, due to an internal error. The given message may give details useful for debugging the problem.
            message: xenopsd internal error: Could not find BlockDevice, File, or Nbd implementation: {"implementations":[["XenDisk",{"backend_type":"9pfs","extra":{},"params":"vdi:1e2e7b99-2ffe-4129-a468-96b57ab685de share_dir none ///root/runx-sr/2"}]]}
            archlinux6
            [18:44 bad-XCP-ng-Host-03 ~]# rpm -qa | grep xenops
            xenopsd-xc-0.150.12-1.2.xcpng8.2.x86_64
            xenopsd-cli-0.150.12-1.2.xcpng8.2.x86_64
            xenopsd-0.150.12-1.2.xcpng8.2.x86_64
            

            Not sure what I'm doing wrong now, or if I need an update??

            When I created the SR I had to give a host-uuid. I obviously used the host that I'm installing on.

            J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J Offline
              jmccoy555 @jmccoy555
              last edited by

              if this helps....

              yum install --enablerepo=epel -y qemu-dp xenopsd xenopsd-cli xenopsd-xc xcp-ng-xapi-storage runx
              Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, product-id, search-disabled-repos, subscription-manager
              
              This system is not registered with an entitlement server. You can use subscription-manager to register.
              
              Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
               * centos-ceph-nautilus: mirror.as29550.net
               * centos-nfs-ganesha28: mirrors.vinters.com
               * epel: mirror.freethought-internet.co.uk
              Excluding mirror: updates.xcp-ng.org
               * xcp-ng-base: mirrors.xcp-ng.org
              Excluding mirror: updates.xcp-ng.org
               * xcp-ng-linstor: mirrors.xcp-ng.org
              Excluding mirror: updates.xcp-ng.org
               * xcp-ng-runx: mirrors.xcp-ng.org
              Excluding mirror: updates.xcp-ng.org
               * xcp-ng-updates: mirrors.xcp-ng.org
              Package 2:qemu-dp-2.12.0-2.0.5.xcpng8.2.x86_64 already installed and latest version
              Package xenopsd-0.150.12-1.2.xcpng8.2.x86_64 already installed and latest version
              Package xenopsd-cli-0.150.12-1.2.xcpng8.2.x86_64 already installed and latest version
              Package xenopsd-xc-0.150.12-1.2.xcpng8.2.x86_64 already installed and latest version
              Package xcp-ng-xapi-storage-1.0.2-3.0.0.runx.1.xcpng8.2.x86_64 already installed and latest version
              Package runx-2021.1-1.0.0.runx.1.xcpng8.2.x86_64 already installed and latest version
              Nothing to do
              
              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • R Offline
                rjt
                last edited by

                Please, Please, Please make this document itself with bash variables when it comes to the various UUIDs:

                [XCP-ngHostX]# SRuuid=$(xe sr-list name-label="Local storage" --minimal)
                [XCP-ngHostX]# RunXdebTemplateName="My RunX Template based on Deb10"
                [XCP-ngHostX]# RUNXdebTEMPLATEuuid=$(xe vm-install template="Debian Buster 10" new-name-label="${RunXdebTemplateName}" sr-uuid=${SRuuid} --minimal)
                [XCP-ngHostX]# echo ${RUNXdebTEMPLATEuuid}
                [XCP-ngHostX]# xe vm-param-set uuid=${RUNXdebTEMPLATEuuid} HVM-boot-policy=""
                [XCP-ngHostX]# xe vm-param-set uuid=${RUNXdebTEMPLATEuuid} PV-args=""
                [XCP-ngHostX]# xe vm-param-set uuid=${RUNXdebTEMPLATEuuid} VCPUs-max=2
                [XCP-ngHostX]# xe vm-param-set uuid=${RUNXdebTEMPLATEuuid} VCPUs-at-startup=2
                [XCP-ngHostX]# xe vm-disk-remove device=0 uuid=${RUNXdebTEMPLATEuuid}
                [XCP-ngHostX]# xe template-param-set is-a-template=true uuid=${RUNXdebTEMPLATEuuid}
                [XCP-ngHostX]# xe template-list name-label="${RunXdebTemplateName}"
                [XCP-ngHostX]# xe template-list uuid=${RUNXdebTEMPLATEuuid}
                
                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • jchuaJ Offline
                  jchua
                  last edited by

                  is this tech preview available on 8.3 alpha release?
                  any idea how can i set RunX on 8.3 release?

                  ronan-aR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • olivierlambertO Offline
                    olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                    last edited by

                    Question for stormi and/or ronan-a

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • ronan-aR Offline
                      ronan-a Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @jchua
                      last edited by

                      jchua We currently don't have a test version planned for XCP-ng 8.3. Only 8.2 is supported for the moment.

                      FinallfF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • FinallfF Offline
                        Finallf @ronan-a
                        last edited by

                        ronan-a would it be too much to ask for a version for 8.3?
                        I'm testing the alpha since publication and I would like to be able to use RunX 😄

                        ronan-aR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • ronan-aR Offline
                          ronan-a Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Finallf
                          last edited by

                          Finallf It's been a while since we've been actively working on this subject, that doesn't mean that this project is abandoned, but it's not our priority target.
                          Currently it is rather this project that we are trying to move forward: https://xen-orchestra.com/blog/announcing-project-pyrgos/

                          Sorry but it's not so soon that we will have a new runx update. 😅

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • olivierlambertO Offline
                            olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                            last edited by

                            Yes, and it's not impossible that RunX will be used in Pyrgos at some point 🙂

                            R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • R Offline
                              ricardogaspar2 @olivierlambert
                              last edited by

                              olivierlambert Is there any updates on the RunX and Pygros ?
                              Any tutorials one can find? Docs or other forum threads?
                              I'm currently running XCP-NG 8.3 beta for my homelab. I'm interested in having kubernetes or Docker runtime using RunX or Pygros.

                              Thanks in advance

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • olivierlambertO Offline
                                olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                last edited by

                                Pyrgos is working, you can already use it directly from your XOA. We are now working on doing lifecycle improvements (like updating a cluster) as a next feature for Q1.

                                RunX is a bit different, it's still a test thing, for now we consider Pyrgos more important (delivering a k8s cluster in a turnkey fashion).

                                M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • M Offline
                                  mavoff @olivierlambert
                                  last edited by

                                  just a personal opinion I'm leaving here, no follow-up needed.

                                  If I want to run containers I use OKD.
                                  I've always seen all the comments about keeping the dom0 controller to a minimum, docker alone adds a 2GB overhead to it, no more problems in adding stuff to it.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • First post
                                    Last post