VMware migration tool: we need your feedback!

planedrop

@olivierlambert Got it, I guess I misunderstood, thought that snapshots of thick provisioned disks used WAY more space but seems like it ends up similar?

I mean the thin provisioned base copy will only use the space that actual VM is using, so still saves some there I suppose, but with thick you are using the space for empty blocks either way.

Thanks again for all the help, this is such a great tool and is just in time for my org to be leaving VMware!

olivierlambert

Are you talking about thin or thick SR? In a thick SR, any active disk will use the total disk space (eg 500GiB even if 10GiB used inside). In a thin SR, the active disk will only use the "real" diff from the base copy (10GiB from our previous example).

I think it's more appropriate to use the term "dynamic image" for VHD files in general. Without the thin=true parameter, the image will be inflated to the total size of the disk with empty blocks, regardless the SR type (thin or thick). With thin=true, we'll only create VHD blocks where there's actual data, so the VHD size will be on the "content" size.

planedrop

@olivierlambert OK I think I got it all now, my brain was totally confusing thin provisioned SRs and disk images, not enough coffee today! lol

This all makes a ton of sense now, thank you!

brezlord

I've done 2 imports and the VMs are up and running. I had to add the nic manually as XO did not create the nic, I had to add it manually.

planedrop

@olivierlambert Just as a quick update, I migrated a 32GB VDI to a different SR and then back, size is still 32GB used, so doesn't appear it "deflated" it or anything like that.

Definitely think using thin=true is the way to go for anyone using this!

brezlord

@planedrop this would only apply to block storage I believe, NFS or ext is thin by default. When I imported a VM that was on an NFS share form ESXi to XCP-ng without the thin=true set the VM was imported with the disk being thin.

planedrop

@brezlord Yes, looks like the disks themselves are thin but whatever was used thick wise is what the disk is inflated to.

i.e. without the thin=true, a 100GB thick disk on ESXi with only 20GB used would end up taking up 100GB on the SR, but if you grow the disk beyond the 100GB it's all thin at that point, so you could change it to a 200GB and it's still using only 100GB of actual space.

BUT with thin=true, the 100GB thick disk on ESXi that only has 20GB used would ONLY use up 20GB of space on the SR in XCP-ng (so it'd only be inflated to 20GB while still showing the OS it's a 100GB disk). Saves a lot of space if you have VMs with massive disks and low usage (like one of the hosts I am migrating which has 13TB assigned thick disks but only about 4TB is used).

@olivierlambert did I get this right?

florent

@planedrop great explanation planedrop, I may use it later

florent

@brezlord the imported VM should have the network, all set to the networkId of the command line. I will look into this

florent

@brezlord : i pushed a fix for the network missing

olivierlambert

@planedrop If your SR is thick (local LVM, iSCSI), it doesn't matter, the disk will be always the total size of the disk, regardless thin=true in the VMware migration tool. This last option is relevant for thin SR (local ext, NFS etc.)

brezlord

@florent I get the following error now.

root@xoa:~# xo-cli vm.importFromEsxi host=192.168.40.203 user='root' password='obfuscated ' sslVerify=false vm=30 sr=accb1cf1-92b7-5d47-e2c4-e7d8a282c448 network=83594c5b-8b5b-b45f-d3a7-7e5301468dc8 thin=true
✖ HANDLE_INVALID(network, OpaqueRef:478f9e9d-7592-40a2-ab07-10a0a6982e45)
JsonRpcError: HANDLE_INVALID(network, OpaqueRef:478f9e9d-7592-40a2-ab07-10a0a6982e45)
    at Peer._callee$ (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202301251747/node_modules/json-rpc-peer/dist/index.js:139:44)
    at tryCatch (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202301251747/node_modules/@babel/runtime/helpers/regeneratorRuntime.js:44:17)
    at Generator.<anonymous> (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202301251747/node_modules/@babel/runtime/helpers/regeneratorRuntime.js:125:22)
    at Generator.next (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202301251747/node_modules/@babel/runtime/helpers/regeneratorRuntime.js:69:21)
    at asyncGeneratorStep (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202301251747/node_modules/@babel/runtime/helpers/asyncToGenerator.js:3:24)
    at _next (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202301251747/node_modules/@babel/runtime/helpers/asyncToGenerator.js:22:9)
    at /opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202301251747/node_modules/@babel/runtime/helpers/asyncToGenerator.js:27:7
    at new Promise (<anonymous>)
    at Peer.<anonymous> (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202301251747/node_modules/@babel/runtime/helpers/asyncToGenerator.js:19:12)
    at Peer.exec (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202301251747/node_modules/json-rpc-peer/dist/index.js:182:20)

vm.importFromEsxi
{
  "host": "192.168.40.203",
  "user": "root",
  "password": "* obfuscated *",
  "sslVerify": false,
  "vm": "30",
  "sr": "accb1cf1-92b7-5d47-e2c4-e7d8a282c448",
  "network": "83594c5b-8b5b-b45f-d3a7-7e5301468dc8",
  "thin": true
}
{
  "code": "HANDLE_INVALID",
  "params": [
    "network",
    "OpaqueRef:478f9e9d-7592-40a2-ab07-10a0a6982e45"
  ],
  "call": {
    "method": "network.get_MTU",
    "params": [
      "OpaqueRef:478f9e9d-7592-40a2-ab07-10a0a6982e45"
    ]
  },
  "message": "HANDLE_INVALID(network, OpaqueRef:478f9e9d-7592-40a2-ab07-10a0a6982e45)",
  "name": "XapiError",
  "stack": "XapiError: HANDLE_INVALID(network, OpaqueRef:478f9e9d-7592-40a2-ab07-10a0a6982e45)
    at Function.wrap (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202301251747/packages/xen-api/src/_XapiError.js:16:12)
    at /opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202301251747/packages/xen-api/src/transports/json-rpc.js:37:27
    at AsyncResource.runInAsyncScope (node:async_hooks:204:9)
    at cb (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202301251747/node_modules/bluebird/js/release/util.js:355:42)
    at tryCatcher (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202301251747/node_modules/bluebird/js/release/util.js:16:23)
    at Promise._settlePromiseFromHandler (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202301251747/node_modules/bluebird/js/release/promise.js:547:31)
    at Promise._settlePromise (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202301251747/node_modules/bluebird/js/release/promise.js:604:18)
    at Promise._settlePromise0 (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202301251747/node_modules/bluebird/js/release/promise.js:649:10)
    at Promise._settlePromises (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202301251747/node_modules/bluebird/js/release/promise.js:729:18)
    at _drainQueueStep (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202301251747/node_modules/bluebird/js/release/async.js:93:12)
    at _drainQueue (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202301251747/node_modules/bluebird/js/release/async.js:86:9)
    at Async._drainQueues (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202301251747/node_modules/bluebird/js/release/async.js:102:5)
    at Immediate.Async.drainQueues [as _onImmediate] (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202301251747/node_modules/bluebird/js/release/async.js:15:14)
    at processImmediate (node:internal/timers:471:21)
    at process.callbackTrampoline (node:internal/async_hooks:130:17)"
}

florent

@brezlord that looks lik an invlaid network id , are you sure it's ok ?
(this was not visible before since the code was skipping VIFs creation)

brezlord

@florent It's copied direct from XO web UI.

olivierlambert

Are you sure it's not a PIF? Can you do a xe network-param-list uuid=<UUID>?

If it doesn't work, then do it for a PIF: xe pif-param-list uuid=<UUID>

brezlord

@olivierlambert said in VMware migration tool: we need your feedback!:

xe network-param-list uuid=

yes you are right I had an error in the uuid. I copied it from the host and not the pool.

olivierlambert

Does it work now? In XO6, we'll do everything to avoid the confusion between a PIF and a network, it should be more clear than it is today.

brezlord

@olivierlambert yes. I very excited to test out XO6.

planedrop

Just as some additional feedback about this, I tried with thin=true today on a small 20GB Ubuntu VM and it worked great!!

I do have a suggestion though, I'd love to see a task in XOA about reading the blocks from the ESXi VM. When I entered the command, I thought nothing was working because a task never started, but when I checked network stats on the host it was very clear it was reading from ESXi. Once it finished reading, it imported the disk (which created a task) and the actual VHD space used is only 7.5GB!

olivierlambert

Yes, as I explain, the first pass is just reading the whole VMware disk once. It's only doing the transfer on second pass.

That's why there's no XCP-ng task in the first pass (since until now, we only have XCP-ng tasks, there's no XO tasks).

But it's changing, we are about to release XO tasks, so it will be easier to track the job