After installing updates: 0 bytes free, Control domain memory = 0B
-
Well, first, you are on XCP-ng 8.3, right? It's still a beta, so by definition this could happen (especially a jump like this from Xen 4.13 to 4.17). If you want guarantee stability, you have to stick to our LTS version.
Anyway, to know which Xen version you are running, you can do a:
cat /sys/hypervisor/version/minor
. If it's17
, then you are on Xen 4.17 and that's your issue. I don't know how this could happen in the first place, like if the Grub file was never updated or tinkered before.To check a bit more, when on Grub, press "e" key to edit the first entry and make a picture to see what's displayed there. I'm thinking on a way to regen Grub that will take the right Xen version into account (ping @stormi )
-
@olivierlambert
I had to use 8.3 on these newest 6 hosts since 8.2.1 gave me a black screen mid-way in the installation. I guess because of missing drivers. The forum adviced 8.3 and that worked wonderfully. It has been working fine for more than 1/2 year (forgot when I started using it).I did not register well enough that i was running a risk by doing this. Mea culpa.
-
@Dataslak
I am late to a meeting with customers. I would much rather stay in the office to work with this. But when I come back in a couple of hours I will eagerly check for a recipe/howto on what to do next, and then carefully follow those.
I am very optimistic now. Thank you all for assisting and to @olivierlambert for the big development today. -
So now we know the problem, the next step will be to solve it
Let's check what's going on in
/boot
with als -la /boot
-
@olivierlambert said in After installing updates: 0 bytes free, Control domain memory = 0B:
You have an issue: I'm pretty sure you are using Xen 4.13 while using the 4.17 tooling around, causing this problem. So the question is "why are you booting on 4.13?". Double check your Grub menu when you boot, to see that you actually boots on Xen 4.17
Nice catch, this is what community is all about
-
@olivierlambert
I love and respect your attitude
Agree wholeheartedly with @nikade
-
So
/boot/xen.gz
is pointing toxen-4.17.3-4.gz
, which sounds correct. So why you are still running on Xen 4.13? It's like you did not reboot, but since you showed me the Grub menu, I'm assuming you already didIt would be interesting to compare the existing xen file and see if it's the right one from our repo. Something is fishy here
-
Can you
md5sum xen-4.17.3-4.gz
From the mirror & RPM, I have
f011721be0c7b57563e29ed282558da3
-
Adding @yann in the loop in case I'm missing something obvious
-
@Dataslak what does
lsblk -o name,mountpoint,label,size,uuid
show? -
-
@yann
Hello Yann, thank you for pitching in.
-
@Dataslak can you please request a commandline from GRUB (hit
c
on the boot menu), and issue the following commands:echo $root search --label --set root root-eqjpzg echo $root
-
Also a
cat /proc/mdstat
in the Dom0 would help. -
Info: I am mirroring two M.2 SSDs ! Software RAID established by the installation routine of v8.3.
Could the mirror be broken and cause this somehow? -
@olivierlambert said in After installing updates: 0 bytes free, Control domain memory = 0B:
Also a cat /proc/mdstat in the Dom0 would help.
Please forgive my ignorance: How do I execute this command in Dom0 ?
I've read https://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Dom0 and it helped a little. Do I run the command in the console within XOA?
-
@Dataslak so it is choosing to "boot from the 1st disk of the raid1", we could try to tell him to boot from the 2nd one:
- on the grub menu hit
e
to edit the boot commands - replace that
search ...
line withset root=hd1,gpt1
- then hit Ctrl-x to boot
- on the grub menu hit
-
@Dataslak Dom0 is "the host" (if you think it's the host it's not really but anyway), ie the machine you are connected to and showing results since the start
-
@yann
Wohoo!!
All VMs came up!
Host is not in maintenance mode.
Control domain memory = 12GiB
Stats are back
Etc....As far as I can see (which is limited) everything looks good?
How can I see the status of the RAID1 and see if the mirror is intact ?
-
@olivierlambert
Thank you for explaining to me. I will look more into details when (if) I find timeAh - I see you were ahead of me !
How can I interpret this? Raid1 OK? Synched? Ready to deal with a single drive failure?
How will XO inform me if one of the drives fails? Will I have to scour through logs, or will there be a clear visible notice in the interface?