XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XenServer 8 (general discussion)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
    4 Posts 3 Posters 1.5k Views 2 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • akurzawaA Offline
      akurzawa
      last edited by

      Hi

      Some thoughts

      Could xs8 bring vdi over 2TB? This is main question becouse this is real pain right now

      Also
      Citrix strarted stripping XENserver after 7.2 release, also They are aware of free, the "real" free version of xs which is xcp-ng. So I wonder if future of xcp is at danger? I mean citrix for sure stripped xs functionality to force users to move over paid versios, so could They somehow influence of development of xcp? Meaning could they somehow broke it, dont release features that could be in future releases of xcp-ng?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • olivierlambertO Offline
        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
        last edited by

        1. 2TiB limit: no. VHD format is limited by design to 2TiB. SMAPIv3 is not yet production ready (qcow2 format is used, without 2TiB limit). We are working on it to get all new SRs available on it, so… patience 🙂 Also be careful when you want to use very large disk in your VMs, this tends to get your VM less agile (longer migrate time, longer backup/recovery time)
        2. No danger. XCP-ng is based on the open source packages of XenServer. No chance Xen or XAPI will be closed in the future, because they are Linux Foundation project. Also, if you didn't, please see this FOSDEM video where I explain the future of XCP-ng project: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpGC5zuLjSs
        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • ? Offline
          A Former User
          last edited by

          How far is the progression on the qcow2 implementation? Because I am having this issue now as well. That the VHD is limiting the VM to 2TiB... 😞

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • olivierlambertO Offline
            olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
            last edited by olivierlambert

            Current priority of our storage dev ( @ronan-a ) is to finish LINSTOR implementation on SMAPIv1, so SMAPIv3 work is paused until we finish that first. I'll be happy to have another storage developer, but we are still a small team.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post