This is installed and working on my two test systems but they're both AMD so I'm not able to test the updated microcode.
JeffBerntsen
@JeffBerntsen
Best posts made by JeffBerntsen
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.2 updates announcements and testing
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.2 updates announcements and testing
This seems to be working fine on my two test systems but I don't do PCI passthrough.
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.2 updates announcements and testing
@bleader Seems to be running just fine on my test servers as well.
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 public alpha 🚀
Here's the results from one of my test lab servers:
Test server: HP MicroServer CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) II Neo N36L RAM: 8GB xtf-runner selftest -q --host Combined test results: test-hvm32-selftest SUCCESS test-hvm32pae-selftest SUCCESS test-hvm32pse-selftest SUCCESS test-hvm64-selftest SUCCESS test-pv64-selftest SUCCESS xtf-runner -aqq --host Combined test results: test-pv64-cpuid-faulting SKIP test-pv64-pv-fsgsbase SKIP test-hvm32-umip SKIP test-hvm64-umip SKIP test-pv64-xsa-167 SKIP test-pv64-xsa-182 SKIP /usr/libexec/xen/bin/test-cpu-policy CPU Policy unit tests Testing CPU vendor identification: Testing CPUID serialise success: Testing CPUID deserialise failure: Testing CPUID out-of-range clearing: Testing MSR serialise success: Testing MSR deserialise failure: Testing policy compatibility success: Testing policy compatibility failure: Done: all ok echo $? 0
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.2 updates announcements and testing
@gduperrey Tested and working in my lab as well. So far, so good...
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.2 updates announcements and testing
@gduperrey
Installed on my test lab systems, 2 very old AMD systems with shared NFS storage with a mix of different types of guests. All working so far. -
RE: XCP-ng 8.2 updates announcements and testing
@gduperrey
Applied on my test systems and all seems to be working well here. -
RE: XCP-ng and Linbit alliance
This is fantastic news! Thanks for sharing it. Olivier mentioned that something might be in the works but didn't mention much more than that.
I've used DRBD on various projects in the past and been nothing but impressed by it. It would be interesting to see if you could reach out to the folks behind HA-Lizard as well; they've got a lot of experience with DRBD on Xen systems.
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.2 updates announcements and testing
Installed and seems to be working well on my test systems.
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.2 updates announcements and testing
Seems to be working well on my test servers.
Latest posts made by JeffBerntsen
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.2 updates announcements and testing
Installed and seems to be working well on my test systems.
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.2 updates announcements and testing
@gduperrey, I suspected that was the case after seeing that message but wanted to make sure. Thanks!
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.2 updates announcements and testing
@stormi said in XCP-ng 8.2 updates announcements and testing:
@JeffBerntsen Do you have XOSTOR on the pool?
Not yet, but was planning to add it to this test pool so thought I should downgrade beforehand. Does that particular patch only apply to systems with XOSTOR already installed?
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.2 updates announcements and testing
@gduperrey, that doesn't seem to work for me. I receive an error from yum:
No Match for available package: http-nbd-transfer-1.3.0-1.xcpng8.2.x86_64
Nothing to do -
RE: XCP-ng 8.2 updates announcements and testing
Seems to be working well on my test servers.
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.2 updates announcements and testing
This seems to be working well for me too.
-
RE: Is it possible to do this with VM list filters?
@Danp You're right, I missed the question mark on it when I tried it before. With the question mark, it works. Thank you for your help.
-
RE: Is it possible to do this with VM list filters?
@Danp I've tried that and it doesn't seem to work. Entering hasVendorDevice into the filter box whether followed with nothing, with :true or :false, leaves the filtered VM list completely empty. I'm running on xoa updated to the latest stable channel version, 5.99.1.
-
Is it possible to do this with VM list filters?
I'm trying to filter the VM list to show only Windows servers that are set to receive drivers via Windows update and don't seem to be able to do it. As far as I know, the property is called hasVendorDevice but using either hasVendorDevice:true or hasVendorDevice:false ends up showing no VMs at all? Am I doing something wrong and, if so, what or is it just not possible to filter on this? I'm also trying to filter based on the secure boot setting and having the same problem with that.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.2 updates announcements and testing
@bleader They're installed and running well on my test lab systems.