XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Dennis 0
    3. Posts
    D
    Offline
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 0
    • Posts 3
    • Groups 0

    Posts

    Recent Best Controversial
    • RE: XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀

      @john-c
      I'm not entirely sure I understand your writing correctly, but be aware that "Automatic (DHCP)" can mean both SLAAC and DHCP. DHCP can't stand alone on the network - SLAAC is also needed for route announcement, so you either get defaultroute/address/DNS from SLAAC only or SLAAC+DHCP. Never DHCP alone.

      Although it is by no means a bulletproof "method", the address part of the last bits of your IP seems a bit too "random" compared to a DHCP-based address - at least from my experience. In the networks I've seen it looks more like DHCP tends to give out more sequential addresses like ::1000:1044.

      You've posted a screenshot further up which has two IPv6-addresses assigned. Both a ULA and a GUA. They are almost definitely SLAAC-based as they both have the last 64-bits in common and looks like EUI64-based. Do you get addresses from both subnets on your laptop too?

      What kind of router do you have on your network? Is it some Busiess-grade Cisco, Juniper etc. or i.e OpenWRT which defaults to announcing a ULA-network (not that others can't, but not that typical AFAIK).

      posted in News
      D
      Dennis 0
    • RE: XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀

      @john-c Are you certain that the IPv6 address+DNS configuration obtained on your laptop + CentOS-machine is actually from DHCP and not from SLAAC?

      Can you send the the IPv6-address you got on your laptop? (Possibly only the last 64 bits if not comfortable sending the entire IP)

      posted in News
      D
      Dennis 0
    • RE: IPv6 support in XCP-ng for the management interface - feedback wanted

      Short format works fine 🙂

      IPv6-only server still running for almost a year now without problems.

      Not using it for anything mission critical as of yet, as installing updates is a bit "exciting" trying to combine main repo with the experimental ipv6-repo (avoid overwriting ipv6-patched packages on update) but still getting CVE's fixed from kernel etc. Haven't broken anything yet (AFAIK) - just looking forward to see this in a release.

      (+ There might be a few useful details hiding here: https://github.com/xcp-ng/xcp/issues/437 in case)

      DennisGlindhart created this issue in xcp-ng/xcp

      closed IPv6 support on host #437

      posted in News
      D
      Dennis 0