Thank you for the input everyone. I've tested XenAdminQt and it sees iso library, thank you for advice!
Reason for using XCP-ng center is ease of use/simplicity during quick testing deployments in comparison to XO.
Thank you for the input everyone. I've tested XenAdminQt and it sees iso library, thank you for advice!
Reason for using XCP-ng center is ease of use/simplicity during quick testing deployments in comparison to XO.
Thank you for the input everyone. I've tested XenAdminQt and it sees iso library, thank you for advice!
Reason for using XCP-ng center is ease of use/simplicity during quick testing deployments in comparison to XO.
Problem persists months later, even with latest xcpng 8.3 updates (in case it might be related)...
Annyone else encountered same problem?
Thank you for explanation!
My production servers are currently running XenServer VM Tools for Windows 9.4.2. Would you recommend switching to XCP-ng tools?
In regards to statement few posts above that XCP-ng tools are developed by Vates, does that mean that Vates builds them from scratch or modifies Citrix/XenServer ones?
I am thinking about switching to "XCP-ng windows guest tools 9.0.9137'', production is currently on "XenServer VM Tools for Windows 9.4.2".
Hi everyone,
Did anyone else notice that built in SR "XCP-ng VM Tools" cannot be seen by XCP-ng Center 25.0.4 ?

Only way for me to get it to work in combo 8.3 + 25.0.4 was to destroy SR and add it from the scratch...